You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New FMS/Eflite Su-30 coming soon

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by JLambCWU View Post

    You’re gonna want to fly that battery as far back as you can move it against the nose gear hump. I even cut the hump out on mine to move the battery back to touching the nose wheel when it retracts. Even then, it will be nose heavy.

    3-3:30 on a 70C Roaring Top 5500mah. I’ve flown most all major brands of 6S Lipos. Nothing Tops, Roaring Tops, no joke. They put down the best power for the weight,
    see Andy over at www.rcjetwerx.com
    But do you have any idea what is the actual CG that you fly at (115mm or closer to the 150mm mark)? I've added twin LED afterburners plus put 4 coats of spar urethane (which added tail weight) so if I move it back to touching the nose wheel it will be at 150mm or higher?

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulZ View Post

    I am getting 3:30 flight times and land at 3.8v storage charge on 6s 5000 HRB packs. They cost $75 ;-)
    Guarantee they don’t accelerate and hold power like a Roaring Top in high amp draw applications.

    I’ve tried every major brand going on 6S. Nothing has beat a Roaring Top for putting down the power at or near the same weight as a 5500 70C RT.

    I REGULARLY go out and put up 20+ flights a day on dual 70mm and large 90mm setups, and I push them all hard. These aren’t lab tests, I go for actual flight performance and do it at high density altitudes.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by T-CAT View Post
    Roaring tops are good LiPo's , but yes, there are LiPo's from other brands that "Top" Roaring Top.
    Agreed! I don’t get swayed by “testimonials”, especially when they sound like sales pitches. My Graphenes are the Best. Oh wait, my HK Heavy Duty are the best. But then, my ChinaHobbyLine are the best. And they’re all less money.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulZ
    replied
    Originally posted by JLambCWU View Post

    You’re gonna want to fly that battery as far back as you can move it against the nose gear hump. I even cut the hump out on mine to move the battery back to touching the nose wheel when it retracts. Even then, it will be nose heavy.

    3-3:30 on a 70C Roaring Top 5500mah. I’ve flown most all major brands of 6S Lipos. Nothing Tops, Roaring Tops, no joke. They put down the best power for the weight,
    see Andy over at www.rcjetwerx.com
    I am getting 3:30 flight times and land at 3.8v storage charge on 6s 5000 HRB packs. They cost $75 ;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • T-CAT
    replied
    Originally posted by JLambCWU View Post

    3-3:30 on a 70C Roaring Top 5500mah. I’ve flown most all major brands of 6S Lipos. Nothing Tops, Roaring Tops, no joke. They put down the best power for the weight,
    see Andy over at www.rcjetwerx.com
    Roaring tops are good LiPo's , but yes, there are LiPo's from other brands that "Top" Roaring Top. Before spending the dough, it is helpful to see how specific brands and versions of LiPo's performed during testing. This at least provides a more accurate depiction of what a customer may expect from a LiPo. Even then, as we all know, the quality control of LiPo batches of manufacturing may change, manufacturers change, the weights, dimensions, and packaging may change, etc. So, a LiPo we received 6 months ago, may not be the same as it once was, but testing at least gives a reference point of performance. With that said, the thread linked below has had (and continues to have) many contributors, and Joe (MCSGUY) has done an incredible job organizing and performing LiPo testing over the years.

    https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...st-Comparisons

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post

    Very cool, love your videos, especially kicking up the dust on the runway, outstanding.

    Quick question, getting ready to maiden my SU-30 (if the winds will every drop below 20mph) and set mine up with flaperons and a 7th channel for the airbrake.
    Question 1: The manual has a CG range of something like 115-150mm. I'm starting in the middle at 132 for the maiden. Where did you find it flies best?
    Question 2: With the air brake deployed, I assume you had to give it slightly more throttle than without on landing, yes?

    Thanks
    You’re gonna want to fly that battery as far back as you can move it against the nose gear hump. I even cut the hump out on mine to move the battery back to touching the nose wheel when it retracts. Even then, it will be nose heavy.

    3-3:30 on a 70C Roaring Top 5500mah. I’ve flown most all major brands of 6S Lipos. Nothing Tops, Roaring Tops, no joke. They put down the best power for the weight,
    see Andy over at www.rcjetwerx.com

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    OH, and how much time are you getting (I'm using the Admiral 6000mah)

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by JLambCWU View Post
    Down and Dirty with the SU-30

    Preview video of getting low, slow, fast and vertical with the SU-30 from Eflite. This jet is so heavy, it has no right flying this good. Powered by Roaring Top 70C 5500mah batteries, she still flys amazing.

    Look for the full video soon...
    Get your batteries over at RCJETWERX. Andy will set you up right!

    Camera girl does it again!
    Very cool, love your videos, especially kicking up the dust on the runway, outstanding.

    Quick question, getting ready to maiden my SU-30 (if the winds will every drop below 20mph) and set mine up with flaperons and a 7th channel for the airbrake.
    Question 1: The manual has a CG range of something like 115-150mm. I'm starting in the middle at 132 for the maiden. Where did you find it flies best?
    Question 2: With the air brake deployed, I assume you had to give it slightly more throttle than without on landing, yes?

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Beachsideflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by fredmdbud View Post
    WTF is with this Russian POS? Why would you want to fly an image of a machine that may attract your armed forces

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Down and Dirty with the SU-30

    Preview video of getting low, slow, fast and vertical with the SU-30 from Eflite. This jet is so heavy, it has no right flying this good. Powered by Roaring Top 70C 5500mah batteries, she still flys amazing.

    Look for the full video soon...
    Get your batteries over at RCJETWERX. Andy will set you up right!

    Camera girl does it again!

    Leave a comment:


  • T-CAT
    replied
    Nice Hugh! I can imagine you're itching to get some flights in. Hopefully the weather plays nicely soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Finally got the SU-30 finished and ready to fly. Unfortunately, just in time for the weather to go to hell, high winds (20-25mph) predicted for the foreseeable future, and mostly cross winds. At least I'll have some time to work on the F-18. Did only a few things to it, the idea was minor mods and get it out flying. I did do the following:

    1) Set it up with flaperons and a 7th channel so the speed brake is on it's own, independent switch. Also trimmed the nose gears wheel pants a bit as I fly off grass, hope this keeps it from catching on it.
    2) Added the twin LED afterburners and coated the exhaust tubes in aluminum foil tape. Since the EDF is closer to the nozzles than say my F-4's and F-16, it seems to show up even better.
    3) Coated it with 4 coats of gloss spar urethane, mostly for protection of the paint as I said earlier this paint's adhesion is awful, but it sure shines nicely with the gloss!
    4) Did some very minor things to the cockpit and added a second pilot (c'mon E-flight, how could you leave it with only one pilot).
    5) Added some red paint to the underside of the horizontal stabs, mostly cause I have major difficulty with my orientation, especially with fast moving jets. Tried for the first time Aros's suggestion of using Tamiya trim tape. It was a little hard to find, but I got several roles of 2mm, 3mm & 5mm and man, this stuff works great. Been using Testors trim tape for years, but I think they discontinued it. Even so, the Tamiya seems better for delicate surfaces and since I gloss coated it first, the edges came out sharp with no lifting (primarily I think because of the urethane coating).
    6) Gave the missiles a little paint as well, need to see them if I'm going to put them on and fly with the extra drag.
    7) Did a couple different nose cones. They were a real pain starting out with unpainted foam, it was prime, sand, prime, sand, etc. until I had a smooth enough surface that it didn't look like the moon.

    This jet is slightly larger (30" wide at the horizontal stabs and 60" long without the nose) than any other jet I have, so I had to rearrange my hangar to get it to fit-where there's a will, there's a way! Can't wait for the winds to die down and try this thing out. Hmm, hope it fits in the truck.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20200223_164346.jpg
Views:	589
Size:	258.7 KB
ID:	237879

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20200223_164315.jpg
Views:	519
Size:	259.6 KB
ID:	237880


    Click image for larger version

Name:	20200222_125109.jpg
Views:	445
Size:	144.9 KB
ID:	237881

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20200223_203937.jpg
Views:	479
Size:	164.0 KB
ID:	237882

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20200223_164552.jpg
Views:	501
Size:	298.8 KB
ID:	237883

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by dusmmdb View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CFFEBE82-D729-407F-8ACD-600DBA0104A1.jpeg
Views:	746
Size:	47.0 KB
ID:	237670Click image for larger version

Name:	C3FF6A56-C731-4BEC-BBB7-35B6708615FF.jpeg
Views:	751
Size:	79.3 KB
ID:	237671Click image for larger version

Name:	A3BFAECA-B352-4DAA-B380-B6B6BB3D3689.jpeg
Views:	765
Size:	64.5 KB
ID:	237672 I threw a second pilot, seats and a HUD into mine to make the cockpit not look so... plain

    now I have to clean paint up and do touch ups but I think this will do for now
    Nice, I guess E-Flight couldn't spring for the 2 bucks for a second pilot, either that or the cut-backs in the Russian economy are everywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • dusmmdb
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CFFEBE82-D729-407F-8ACD-600DBA0104A1.jpeg
Views:	746
Size:	47.0 KB
ID:	237670Click image for larger version

Name:	C3FF6A56-C731-4BEC-BBB7-35B6708615FF.jpeg
Views:	751
Size:	79.3 KB
ID:	237671Click image for larger version

Name:	A3BFAECA-B352-4DAA-B380-B6B6BB3D3689.jpeg
Views:	765
Size:	64.5 KB
ID:	237672 I threw a second pilot, seats and a HUD into mine to make the cockpit not look so... plain

    now I have to clean paint up and do touch ups but I think this will do for now

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulZ View Post

    Yes, have been landing full flaps and air brake deployed. Yes you will need more throttle to keep her flying that way. Makes for a softer landing in my case. One note, I did not like how she felt during cross-wind landings with flaps deployed. With flaperons you loose alieron effectiveness and in a strong cross wind the rudder may not be enough to correct for being blown off the runway. I had a situation forcing me to land off the runway in grass with a 90 degree cross wind.
    Thanks for all your advice PaulZ, really appreciate it. How many mm of deflection did you use for full flaps and take-off flaps?

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulZ
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post

    Thanks PaulZ, I haven't flown it yet, currently painting the urethane on. I'll go ahead and increase the gains to the original, but still seems high to me, but what do I know. I went ahead and assigned the FM channel to Aux 1, which is the Flap channel for me and got 2 flight modes out of it (since the flap travel is not 100/0/-100 it won't change to all 3 flight modes, but 2 is enough-1 for take-off and landing flaps and the other for fly around).

    One last question, how much deflection did you program into the take-off and landing flaps and does it make a big difference on landing and take-off speed? Have you landed with full flaps and the air brake and how does that feel, image you need to keep on the throttle.
    Yes, have been landing full flaps and air brake deployed. Yes you will need more throttle to keep her flying that way. Makes for a softer landing in my case. One note, I did not like how she felt during cross-wind landings with flaps deployed. With flaperons you loose alieron effectiveness and in a strong cross wind the rudder may not be enough to correct for being blown off the runway. I had a situation forcing me to land off the runway in grass with a 90 degree cross wind.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulZ
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post
    PaulZ, also forgot to ask how much up trim did you need for the elevator on flap deployment.
    None, this is a strange model. The flaperons made no difference in pitch, I know does not make sense aerodynamically...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    PaulZ, also forgot to ask how much up trim did you need for the elevator on flap deployment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulZ View Post

    Hugh, sorry for the late reply. Just a note on the 85/80/75 AS3X rates. These are spot on and the model flies perfectly with these. I had no oscillations at full speed. Agree they seem high but this model has a very slow roll rate so it makes sense. I copied these into the 7ch RX and it worked fine.
    Thanks PaulZ, I haven't flown it yet, currently painting the urethane on. I'll go ahead and increase the gains to the original, but still seems high to me, but what do I know. I went ahead and assigned the FM channel to Aux 1, which is the Flap channel for me and got 2 flight modes out of it (since the flap travel is not 100/0/-100 it won't change to all 3 flight modes, but 2 is enough-1 for take-off and landing flaps and the other for fly around).

    One last question, how much deflection did you program into the take-off and landing flaps and does it make a big difference on landing and take-off speed? Have you landed with full flaps and the air brake and how does that feel, image you need to keep on the throttle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mikkelb
    replied
    Originally posted by dusmmdb View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	2D0496A8-A2A1-40FD-98C4-940E03F44119.jpeg
Views:	791
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	236960

    It is molded into the frame which prevents some difficulty in moving.

    i used foam. I had some layered foam from an old kit (don’t remember the name) that I simply used the wings (see pic). The foam is stiff enough to stay rigid. I then used a small piece underneath to keep the canards from flexing.

    mistake I made was not removing the canopy before starting. Trying to remove it now has presented further difficulties. I’m not sure what they used to glue it on but it doesn’t want to separate from the foam as easy as a free wing planes does. I may simply insert a second pilot from underneath for now

    mike
    Nice, well again great job it looks really good and the weathering as well came out nicely. Looking forward to hearing a successful maiden if it hasn't already.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X