So manufacturers specs for this FMS EDF setup is 25.20v X 112amps=2822watts.
HS=Hobbystar
TGY=Turnigy
TGY-NT=Turnigy-Nano Tech
The rest of the lipos brands should be self explanatory.
Ok from top to bottom these are the power runs,
HS 4200mah 40c 6s two lipos parallel =8400mah
>3141.7 W at 143.46A
HS 8000mah 100c 6s
>2880.4W at 121.35A
HRB 6000 56c 6s
>2802.2W at 120.88A
CNHL G+plus 5000 55c burst 110c 6s
>2761.7W at 121.72A
CNHL 2200 40C burst 80c 6s
>2734.2W at 119.59A
CNHL Black 5000 65c 6s
>2690.5W at 119.59A
HS 6200 50c 3s two lipos series
>2673.5 at 123.84A
HS 3500 60c 6s
>2636.3W at 118.22A
CNHL G+plus 6000 70c burst 140c 6s
>2615.8W at 116.26A
HS 3000 30c 6s two lipos parallel =6000mah
>2552.3W at 116.0A
TGY-NT 4000 25-50c 6s
>2536.4W at 113.52A
CNHL 2200 40c 6s two lipos parallel =4400mah
>2492.5W at 117.02A
TGY-NT 5000 35-70c 6s
>2482.2W at 117.64A
HS 4600 35c 6s
>2469.1W at 117.02
TGY 2650 20-30c 6s two lipos parallel =5300mah
>2459.9W at 117.51A
HS 6200 50c 6s
>2453.2 W at 116.82A
HS 5200 45c 3s two lipos series
>2427.5W at 113.33A
HS 4200 40c 6s
>2287.6W at 112.a4A
Interesting that identical lipos packs when wired up in parallel add over 800W of power. Like in the case of the HS 4200 40c 6s, verses just one of these lipos.
Also interesting to note that two 3s wired in a series produced 220W of additional power over the 6s equivalent. Such as in the case of the HS 6200 50c 3s in a series verses the HS 6200 50c 6s.
My thoughts are that two batteries whether wired up in a series or in parallel allow for a truer C rating to the claimed manufacturers C rating.
Below is a picture the lipos tested so that you can compare lipo sizes.
HS=Hobbystar
TGY=Turnigy
TGY-NT=Turnigy-Nano Tech
The rest of the lipos brands should be self explanatory.
Ok from top to bottom these are the power runs,
HS 4200mah 40c 6s two lipos parallel =8400mah
>3141.7 W at 143.46A
HS 8000mah 100c 6s
>2880.4W at 121.35A
HRB 6000 56c 6s
>2802.2W at 120.88A
CNHL G+plus 5000 55c burst 110c 6s
>2761.7W at 121.72A
CNHL 2200 40C burst 80c 6s
>2734.2W at 119.59A
CNHL Black 5000 65c 6s
>2690.5W at 119.59A
HS 6200 50c 3s two lipos series
>2673.5 at 123.84A
HS 3500 60c 6s
>2636.3W at 118.22A
CNHL G+plus 6000 70c burst 140c 6s
>2615.8W at 116.26A
HS 3000 30c 6s two lipos parallel =6000mah
>2552.3W at 116.0A
TGY-NT 4000 25-50c 6s
>2536.4W at 113.52A
CNHL 2200 40c 6s two lipos parallel =4400mah
>2492.5W at 117.02A
TGY-NT 5000 35-70c 6s
>2482.2W at 117.64A
HS 4600 35c 6s
>2469.1W at 117.02
TGY 2650 20-30c 6s two lipos parallel =5300mah
>2459.9W at 117.51A
HS 6200 50c 6s
>2453.2 W at 116.82A
HS 5200 45c 3s two lipos series
>2427.5W at 113.33A
HS 4200 40c 6s
>2287.6W at 112.a4A
Interesting that identical lipos packs when wired up in parallel add over 800W of power. Like in the case of the HS 4200 40c 6s, verses just one of these lipos.
Also interesting to note that two 3s wired in a series produced 220W of additional power over the 6s equivalent. Such as in the case of the HS 6200 50c 3s in a series verses the HS 6200 50c 6s.
My thoughts are that two batteries whether wired up in a series or in parallel allow for a truer C rating to the claimed manufacturers C rating.
Below is a picture the lipos tested so that you can compare lipo sizes.
Comment