-
I use a balancer with my 3D airplane for one reason: when I have to change batteries to those of a different shape or weight, I want to get it close to the sweet spot, so there's less fiddling with battery position. When I know I'll be using differing batteries, I'll find my 'best' balance with a previously flown battery, then make reference marks for the other batteries; then, when at the field, I can switch and fly, and often shift the marks a bit for the new battery. -
As I understand it, most 3D planes are balanced very tail heavy (so they get into and stay in a prop hang easily). The more tail heavy, the better the prop hang. Some flyers prefer their 3D planes one way over the other. Several mm either way doesn't matter to them. Those at my field have been known to shift the battery fore and aft not just mm but many, many mm and sometimes inches. Using a machine is cumbersome and needless. They don't seem to need to be balanced too precisely.
I have a 3D EDF jet (SebArt Mig29). For better hovering, the battery moves back a couple of INCHES. For more normal flight, it goes back forward. It's never seen a balancer except for my 2 index fingers.Leave a comment:
-
One aircraft type that is difficult to balance with any of those machines is a 3D type, or any other which has the vertical center of gravity about even with the center of the wing; inverted or not, the weight is above the resting place on the wing, making the balance unstable. That's where the Vanessa CG rig works better, since it doesn't have the model tipping over the balance point.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Well call me foolish, but I am going to pony up the cash for the EZ Balancer Lite. Heard back from the owner and he said that they have accurately balanced planes weighing less than 1lb.
I plan on buying more planes in the future, so I will put it to good use for sure....
Leave a comment:
-
I have a plane balancer and after using it on a few planes, it just got too "fiddly". Mine has those little slider rulers that butt up against the leading wing edge and the little swiveling pads that the plane sits on, etc. The only thing missing is a micrometer bubble gauge. :p I haven't used it for the last 30 planes. The old finger tip method seems to work just fine. I don't have a single plane where a few mm either way made a difference to the way the plane flies. These days, people experiment with where to set the balance point on a plane anyway. I've heard a few people who stand on soap boxes, holding a bible on one hand and swear that 2mm makes all the difference in the world. I think they got a bad batch of mushrooms. :rolleyes:Leave a comment:
-
I've bought them all and very few of them has met my expectations about the only one I use is from SIG Manufacturing. I'm planning to do a Vanessa CG rig next.
SIG CG Machine.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Very interesting........being a typical guy I never read those instructions for assembly
so the info I actually did see was possibly some not so good marketing stuff. But anyways, like I previously said it can CG airframes less than 2 lbs and as far as "manufacturer put that there for a reason" I am sure that you have had as I and thousands of others have seen that rationale to be fallible. I am very satisfied with mine, so again, good luck on your choice.
Leave a comment:
-
Got the info from the front page of the Great Planes CG Machine assembly instructions. Says in big bold letters: "Not designed for use with planes under 2 lbs flying weight". Glad to hear people have successfully used it with planes weighing under 2lbs, but figured the manufacturer put that on there for a reason?
Here's a link to the Great Planes CG Machine assembly manual:
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Dezlpwr,
Not clear as to where you are getting that info regarding weight capacities because everything I've seen indicates that it can handle up to 40lbs and no minimums were declared. I can actually attest to CGing a club members plane that weighed in at 1.5 lbs with no issues at all for accuracy. Just some more food for thought. Good luck with your decision.
Leave a comment:
-
Also one reason I am shying away from the GP balancer is that it says it balances planes that weigh 2-10lbs. Well, my Tower Hobbies warbirds weigh a little under 2lbs. Guess I will continue with the finger method...Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the welcome and reply. Yes, I play with diesels. I am an engineer on tugboats. I have seen the GP CG Machine. Was just curious about this other one.Leave a comment:
-
Hello Dezlpwr,
Seeing that this is your first post so welcome to the Squawk. Am gathering from your user name that you like fussin with diesels.
As far as that balancer goes that you've solicited opinions on, I don't really see any advantages for getting it. It really looks to typify the ol' school homemade ones of 20 years ago made from 1/2" PVC whereas there is no accurate measurement device incorporated into the design. One of the standard CG machines on the market that has two graduated scales in millimeters on each side is the Great Planes CG Machine. Here's Motion RC's link http://www.motionrc.com/great-planes-c-g-machine/
Rather than go the less expensive route, pay the extra $10 and get yourself a device that will surely remove a lot of frustration in the measurement process of setting up CG's on your airframes.
Best regards,Leave a comment:
-
"Balance Bug" CG Plane Balancer
Looking at buying this CG balancer. Searched far and wide for info on this one but can't find anything on it on any of the RC forums. Does anyone have any opinions on this one? I notice the balancer pads don't run parallel to the fuselage like some others out there. Any problem with this? As far as I can see, should still work fine??
Thanks for any and all opinions on this before I buy it.
Leave a comment: