You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Admiral 3S LiPo - Lack of high mAh packs

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tom
    replied
    Yes, all looks good. We just added it to our website a few minutes ago. Looking good for end of Jan. Could spill over into early Feb if holiday congestion makes shipping a bit slower.

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post
    I talked to the factory last night and unfortunately was not able to get these on the order currently in production. This means the ETA is around the end of January.
    Just under two months away...........things still looking good for the 5000 40C 3S packs with EC5 near the end of January ??

    Leave a comment:


  • Grossman56
    replied
    Well, that's good to hear. I guess you really don't need it until Spring and by then, you'll have a bunch of new planes to load into it, including the FlightLine RC OV-10, has a nice ring to it doesn't it??

    Grossman56

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Grossman56 View Post
    How about the toy hauler CB, anything on that?

    Grossman56
    Loan resolved with a down payment for new sitting in bank waiting for spring ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • Grossman56
    replied
    How about the toy hauler CB, anything on that?

    Grossman56

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Twowingtj View Post
    Did AMA come through for you on the hobby losses?
    AMA will only consider AFTER the primary insurance carrier and then they want ya to jump through some more hoops too.
    Not worth trying to receive the possible $1000(less $100 ded) :Not-Talking:

    Leave a comment:


  • Twowingtj
    replied
    Did AMA come through for you on the hobby losses?

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    4 separate adjusters in involved. Vehicles and structure have been resolved. Just waiting for the contents loss to be approved and paid
    Got the truck replaced and just ordered the all metal building. :Cool:
    Just need the contents money for my tools and toys etc ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom
    replied
    Wow. Is that normal? Seems like a claim should have been paid out at this point. Especially with all you lost.

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Am good with that also Tom. Still waiting for fire monies to rebuild with;)

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom
    replied
    I talked to the factory last night and unfortunately was not able to get these on the order currently in production. This means the ETA is around the end of January.

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post
    I'm trying to sneak these in with the last order I placed a couple weeks ago to cut down the lead time. will keep everyone updated.
    :Cool::)You da man

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom
    replied
    I'm trying to sneak these in with the last order I placed a couple weeks ago to cut down the lead time. will keep everyone updated.

    Leave a comment:


  • TiredIronGRB
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post
    Problem is, the adapter would be sold on our adapter page so anyone could use it for anything and I can't figure out how to stop the liability that would create. We've seen people try to use deans in high power jets and that adapter would allow it with other batteries such as the 4000 6S with deans or 4500 6S with deans both of which were originally intended to be used in the FMS 1700mm warbirds.
    Heck, I would rather have them with no connectors...I would rather do my own:Cool:

    Leave a comment:


  • fhhuber
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post

    A few people have asked for this adapter over the years but we cannot order this due to the potential hazard it creates. This adapter would cause more problems that it solves. If someone used an adapter like this in any 80mm or 90mm jet, the amperage would overwhelm the deans and melt it. We use EC5 on the larger jets because it is one of the few connectors that can handle the current. A couple years back we had a customer change the EC5 on an ME-262 to a deans. As expected, the deans connector melted and the plane crashed. That caused a messy situation.
    Mixed feelings on the Deans for high power...

    I know it really shouldn't be used at extreme amps. However the BVM EVF 5000 watt 12S (thats over 100 amps full throttle) come equipped with ... DEANS.
    The ESCs are soldered to the EDF motors.
    I have over 1100 flights with the OEM Deans plug on the fan, then an extension to 4mm "banana"bullets,(as per Zippy LiPo, with the red plastic housing) splitting the web between the + and - to allow easy daisy chaining 3S and 4S packs to make up 12S.
    I believe what allowed the Deans to survive was that it stayed plugged in and heat shrink covered to prevent it from coming loose. It has maybe 4 plug-unplug cycles.

    Deans CAN take the load. But you have to inspect regularly and watch for it getting hot. If there's ANY defect, its going to melt the plastic and/or the solder.

    I'll be changing the plugs on my big EDFs and upgrading their ESCs before they go into their next model.

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post
    Problem is, the adapter would be sold on our adapter page so anyone could use it for anything and I can't figure out how to stop the liability that would create. We've seen people try to use deans in high power jets and that adapter would allow it with other batteries such as the 4000 6S with deans or 4500 6S with deans both of which were originally intended to be used in the FMS 1700mm warbirds.
    Totally concur ;) As most know there are those that are uninformed and make bad choices.
    Stupid is as stupid does and you can't stop them :Straight-Face:

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom.MotionRC View Post
    It sounds like EC5 is the winner. I'll order with EC5.
    I'm Stoked :Cool::)

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom
    replied
    Problem is, the adapter would be sold on our adapter page so anyone could use it for anything and I can't figure out how to stop the liability that would create. We've seen people try to use deans in high power jets and that adapter would allow batteries such as the 4000 6S with deans or 4500 6S with deans both of which were originally intended to be used in the FMS 1700mm warbirds.

    Leave a comment:


  • vdanger
    replied
    Tom,

    This adapter would be so you could use a single battery in 3 cell planes which the deans could handle.

    I would think it would be doubtful that a person would take two of these EC5 equipped 3 cells, put a ec5 to deans adapter on each of them, then attach a deans serial cable, then attach a deans to ec5 adapter to attach to the ec5 equipped esc on a 80 or 90mm jet? It would be a lot more difficult and costly then to just use an ec5 equipped serial cable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom
    replied
    Originally posted by vdanger View Post
    If you are going to make these, please have an EC5 to Deans adapter also for people that might want to use these seperately.
    A few people have asked for this adapter over the years but we cannot order this due to the potential hazard it creates. This adapter would cause more problems that it solves. If someone used an adapter like this in any 80mm or 90mm jet, the amperage would overwhelm the deans and melt it. We use EC5 on the larger jets because it is one of the few connectors that can handle the current. A couple years back we had a customer change the EC5 on an ME-262 to a deans. As expected, the deans connector melted and the plane crashed. That caused a messy situation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X