Avios Grumman Albatross!

[xviper]

The "ball links" on this plane is the first of their kind I've seen on a plane. Standard ball link pliers won't work. I used a flat blade screwdriver to pry them off. Anyone got a better idea?

[Woodcock]

Given that the Fliteline B-24 and the Hobbyking B-17 are the same scale, I wonder if the FL B-24's radials will fit.

I'd like to know that too.

Woody

[rampage]

Given that the Fliteline B-24 and the Hobbyking B-17 are the same scale, I wonder if the FL B-24's radials will fit.

[Woodcock]

Dam* George,

I thought I was the only one that likes this old retro Grumman. I gotta get me some of those radials. Very nice!

Woody

[brk6188]

OV10, if you find those radial engine moldings in HK's spare parts listing please post the stock #. I cannot locate them. Thanks.

[OV10]

When this Albe first came to life my initial thought was WHAAAAT...................Avios couldn't invest another $5 in the model design price for some faux radials :Confused:
Thanx for doing the leg work TI, made my job of putting radials on it (when I get it) a no brainer. ;)

[TiredIronGRB]

Just in case nobody's paying attention to the RCGroups thread(s), here are the Home Depot paint matches.

Thanks for posting these :Cool:

[TiredIronGRB]

I really like this plane...I did have to make some dummy radials for it, I used HobbyKing B-17 radials and trimmed the center :Cool:

[rampage]

I maidened mine off water this weekend. No water rudder, differential throttle. It's a little squirrelly on takeoff but that's just learning then plane. The throttle differential is extremely effective.

I still have one ESC that's braking. Other than that, good to go. Way too much ailerons by the book too. Slightly nose heavy at the 80mm recommended CG. Needed a few clicks of down elevator to trim.

[Bajora]

I'm thinking yes. As I said, the Catalina turns fine just using the rudder as long as I keep some air flow over it. But since no two planes are exactly the same, I thought I'd ask if Bajora had tested the HU-16 using only the air rudder. Just curious, and I really don't like the looks of that big water rudder.

Sorry ... I have not. Since I have the differential thrust all set-up, I have been falling back to that.

[xviper]

All dressed up and no place to go. Still a bit cold and very windy today. Oddly enough, this plane will never float on water (except the frozen kind).

[wvrailfan]

I got to maiden mine from grass today. What a sweet flying plane, well done Avios!

I am really looking forward to getting down to the river to try it off of water now.

I removed some of the lettering from mine, waiting on replacement decals from Callie. Decided to just change the tail number to Alameda 911.

I'm also going to paint the water rudder blue gray to see if I can make it a little less noticeable. I may even try to cut one from Lexan.

[wvrailfan]

I have a Canadair CL-415 water bomber. It's a twin (without throttle diff) and I can turn that thing on snow and ice by just maxing out the rudder and blipping the throttle. Wouldn't that work on water?

I'm thinking yes. As I said, the Catalina turns fine just using the rudder as long as I keep some air flow over it. But since no two planes are exactly the same, I thought I'd ask if Bajora had tested the HU-16 using only the air rudder. Just curious, and I really don't like the looks of that big water rudder.

[xviper]

Did you by chance do any on water taxi test without the water rudder? I had a Dynam Catalina and flew it from water without the water rudder. As long as you kept up a little speed on the water it would turn okay without the water rudder.

Jim

I have a Canadair CL-415 water bomber. It's a twin (without throttle diff) and I can turn that thing on snow and ice by just maxing out the rudder and blipping the throttle. Wouldn't that work on water?

[wvrailfan]

Nah .. I wanted a more shallow draught, for shallower water operations... and a longer net moment, for more turning authority. Since the real one didn’t even have a water rudder, I am pretty sure you cannot say that there is a “wrong” way to mount it.

;)

Did you by chance do any on water taxi test without the water rudder? I had a Dynam Catalina and flew it from water without the water rudder. As long as you kept up a little speed on the water it would turn okay without the water rudder.

Jim

[Bajora]

RC Who?!:P

[rampage]

Just in case nobody's paying attention to the RCGroups thread(s), here are the Home Depot paint matches.

[Bajora]

The water rudder is on wrong, maybe thats the problem?

Nah .. I wanted a more shallow draught, for shallower water operations... and a longer net moment, for more turning authority. Since the real one didn’t even have a water rudder, I am pretty sure you cannot say that there is a “wrong” way to mount it.

;)

[wvrailfan]

Mine arrived today. Opened it just long enough to check it out. It was well packed and individual parts protected in plastic bags. Mine shows no signs of damage.

From just a quick check, the paint looks very good. kudos to Avios for actually painting the white portion and not just leaving it bare foam. The paint appears to be applied smoothly and the yellow, which I was concerned may be to lemony, is a nice rich shade of yellow.

I plan to eventually wrap this plane and letter it as a WV Air Guard ship, however, I think I will have to put it together and fly it as is for a short while, just because it looks that good.

[uscanuck1xa]

I had been waiting for an RC model of the Albatross because I always found it to be a great seaplane design. However one of the main features I was hoping for it have was retracts so it could actually be flown off a runway just like the real deal.
So unless they come out with a retract add-on kit I have not interest in it.

Tom Hunt is developing a retract set that will work with this model. You can see what he is doing in the Albatross thread in the Waterplanes forum on RCGroups. It will not be a kit, however he will be providing the files so modelers can 3D print the appropriate parts. Other pieces such as the retract units, wheels, etc. will be up to the modeler to purchase on their own as well, although he is clearly specifying what he is using. It is a a very slick setup!