Roban - World Class Scale Helicopters

Larger EPO

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eness76
    Member

    • Dec 2016
    • 9
    • Send PM

    #1

    Larger EPO

    Any chance of FlightLine doing any larger aircraft, more along the 2000mm size like the LX P-40? Would sure make ground handling a lot easier for those of us with flying clubs on grass. I have the Corsair, P-38, Mig-21 and the SU-35, and I've thought since day 1 the 38 enlarged a touch would really improve it. A little lighter wingloading for slower landing speed and more room inside would go a long way on that one. An existing power system for the 1600 Corsair / Spitfire would probably do the job there, also. FlightLine makes such quality products, I'd be more than willing to shell out the extra for a larger product of that quality.
  • Joehockey
    Member

    • Jul 2019
    • 147
    • Send PM

    #2
    Love the idea ! I have a 82” foam kit cut from Bryan Taylor Corsair plans . I may get to it this winter and I hope it will motivate some ARF company to make a large warbird ! I have two of the LX P40ties, great flying planes

    Comment

    • OV10
      >>>Twins are 2X the Fun<<< (Squawk Moderator)

      • Sep 2014
      • 4264
      • Owego, NY
      • Send PM

      #3
      Slowly but surely have been selectively rebuilding the fleet into a larger scale format.
      A 2000 FL P-38 would be the ticket on the 1600 replacement and agree with eness76 that the 1600 Corsair/Spitty powerplants would be a great foundation.
      I also need a Hellcat since there really is no viable one available
      Warbird Charlie
      HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190

      Comment

      • Twowingtj
        If It Flys, I'll Try It

        • Dec 2016
        • 1907
        • Southerntier, NY
        • Send PM

        #4
        I agree with OV10 for a larger P-38. Now that the old VQ models are coming in under Nexa, maybe put the "Alpha" touch on their P-38 would be the ticket. Better prep work, before covering, would need to be done as well.

        The rough wood grain and sanding dust under the covering takes a bit away. For the budget pricepoint models, it can be lived with. But, higher pricepoint models should be better. Black Horse prep work is pretty good.

        Comment

        • tab28682
          RC addict

          • Jul 2017
          • 334
          • Fort Worth, TX
          • Send PM

          #5
          Originally posted by OV10
          Slowly but surely have been selectively rebuilding the fleet into a larger scale format.
          A 2000 FL P-38 would be the ticket on the 1600 replacement and agree with eness76 that the 1600 Corsair/Spitty powerplants would be a great foundation.
          I also need a Hellcat since there really is no viable one available
          if you can give up it being foam, the H-9 F6F is a great airplane.

          Comment

          • OV10
            >>>Twins are 2X the Fun<<< (Squawk Moderator)

            • Sep 2014
            • 4264
            • Owego, NY
            • Send PM

            #6
            Originally posted by tab28682

            if you can give up it being foam, the H-9 F6F is a great airplane.
            hello tab28682
            I am certainly not a foam snob or adverse to balsa airframes but I probably should clarify my use of the word viable.
            The H9 isn't viable because it is missing a key feature...…….flaps, along with no oleo struts.

            Not so great in my books, so back to hoping FlightLine does a 1600 size one.
            I wanted to go with the TopFlite bigun but now that has lived a short life and gone away so I'll just have to keep playing with the 1400 FMS until it's expiration date arrives.:rolling_eyes:
            Warbird Charlie
            HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190

            Comment

            • tab28682
              RC addict

              • Jul 2017
              • 334
              • Fort Worth, TX
              • Send PM

              #7
              Originally posted by OV10

              hello tab28682
              I am certainly not a foam snob or adverse to balsa airframes but I probably should clarify my use of the word viable.
              The H9 isn't viable because it is missing a key feature...…….flaps, along with no oleo struts.

              Not so great in my books, so back to hoping FlightLine does a 1600 size one.
              I wanted to go with the TopFlite bigun but now that has lived a short life and gone away so I'll just have to keep playing with the 1400 FMS until it's expiration date arrives.:rolling_eyes:
              Not that hard to add oleo struts, and I have seen flaps added before. Only other significant shortcoming Is the flat plate tail surfaces.

              Comment

              • CF-105
                Arrowhead

                • Aug 2019
                • 140
                • Atlantic Canada
                • Send PM

                #8
                Over on another forum, Chad Veich was going to do a flap mod on the H9 Hellcat. Don't know that he got around to it tho. Honestly, they really aren't needed, the plane lands well without them. Oleos are available, I got them for mine. Not a big fan of wire gear struts.

                Comment

                • Joehockey
                  Member

                  • Jul 2019
                  • 147
                  • Send PM

                  #9
                  Flaps are not needed on many of the models however for some reason it really bugs me lol !
                  I have added flaps , counter balances, interiors, functional struts, ect .
                  I am not sure why its so difficult to add a few more elements to ARFs when so many nonsense details are added.
                  I know that EPO with the exception of the Giant Scale products from H9, VQ and Top Flight, epo exceeds most of the details seen on wood ARFs .
                  Personally I never look at a model by material unless the foam is so bad that its a negative.
                  I think as far as Hanger 9 /Horizon , they are now owned by an IPO firm and models will be all about bottom line. Just look at the T28 re-release , no changes, no mods, just put it back in the market.

                  Comment

                  Working...