I only have one, and it was given to me by a friend, a Dynam Cirrus SR-22. I ended up adding and interior and repainting it. I wouldn't mind a Grumman Goose. Such a classic and versatile airplane that could double as a warbird!
TiredIron, nothing other than WWII? You gotta get an 80mm F-86. That is one plane no collection should be without. You'll thank me later ;).
-
I have 31 planes, none are civilian...closest thing I have is a couple L4s...I don't even have a non WWII plane.Leave a comment:
-
Keep this thread going guys, we want to hear your thoughts on Civilian planes. Light Sport, Single engine, Turbo Prop, Twin engine, etc. Cessna, Beechcraft, Piper, etc. Let us know years, styles, colors schemes etc. The more ideas the better.
Here is one of my personal favorites, the Beechcraft Baron G58
MarkLeave a comment:
-
XV, you may be partially correct, I do enjoy the war birds at air shows, but I also like the aerobatic displays put on by great pilots in non war birds. I also like to see planes of historic significance just do a nice fly by or two. Same is true when I am at the Smithsonian, I like the war birds, but I also find myself lingering at the civilian planes that helped make history.
I don't have three dozen planes, yet, but of the dozen I do have, I enjoy flying my FMS Cessna and Dynam WACO as much as I enjoy flying My FMS Mustang and Freewing ME-262.
With the exception of my HK SkyMule and Skipper, all of my planes are models of something real, and most have been wrapped or painted by me to more closely represent an actual aircraft. For me, flying a model of a real plane, military or not, is the fun of the hobby. It affords me an opportunity to do something in miniature that I will never be able to do for real.
I know there are hurdles in obtaining license that developers and manufacturers have to deal with that we are rarely aware of. I'm sure there is a better chance of making a profit with a product that can be advertised as "exciting and historic," rather than just "historically significant".
However, when I see the seemingly never ending array of war birds and aerobatic planes available, would a Vega, Ford Trimotor or Electra be too much to dream about? Lets face it, we don't see planes like a Vega sitting around at airports these days, so a nice one at the RC field would probably get as much attention as most war birds.
Leave a comment:
-
I can see the problem (and added expense) with licensing when it comes to civilian planes. Personally, I own only a few such models in my collection of 3 dozen. I can probably count them on one hand and have fingers left over. I have several planes that don't take after anything in real aviation and some that are pure fantasy. The way I see it, we see real civilian planes flying overhead and sitting at airfields all the time. It's not as exciting to see them flying in model form. Sure, we all have our favorites but at least for me, military planes interest me the most. It's sort of like going to a big airshow. It's the military stuff most of us go to see. So, with that in mind, buying a plane that has added cost due to licensing, copyright, etc, doesn't have the same appeal. Not sure they would sell well enough to justify bringing too big a variety to market.Leave a comment:
-
The challenge we've encountered when running the cost analysis on producing a civilian aircraft is that their license owners can sometimes be even more... "aggressive" than the military licensees.
So if any of you have an In at Beechcraft, etc, let me know!Leave a comment:
-
I definitely agree it would be great to see perhaps a more rare or unique model. My personal interest would be the beautiful Lockheed Vega that was made famous by Amelia Earhart.
Denny
Leave a comment:
-
Civilian Planes
It would be really nice to see Fliteline make a really GOOD low wing single or twin maybe along the lines of the Dynam Grand Cruiser. As much as I love the Warbirds we need a good built Civilian style .
Bryan
Leave a comment: