Originally posted by downwindleg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's next from Motion RC?
Collapse
X
-
Dear Alpha and the MotionRC team,
Thank you for not dragging out announced releases for months or years before they are ever truly available. And, when they are released, thank you for not playing some crazy raffle game on who gets to order one. I know we all got a little impatient on Foil, but once it was announced it was ready to order the next morning and then will be delivered in 4-6 weeks from then. MotionRC and even Horizon seem to have gotten the "new release game" figured out in my opinion! A certain other hobby company that thinks they are "king" cannot seem to grasp this rather simple idea but I am thankful y'all get it!
Signed,
"All king'd out"
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evoman View Post
For those that have and interest in the B-58 Hustler please refer to this dedicated thread where I had re-posted an interesting statement by Alpha regarding the feasibility of the B-58 on post #27.
https://www.hobbysquawk.com/forum/rc...-hustler/page2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skyboom View PostI like your flaring when landing. Keep it up!
Comment
-
Originally posted by rifleman_btx View PostYeah i just think it would be ok as long as the improvements in landing gear dont over weight the power. Thats the only reason i would like a twin 70 or so with it..or twin 65mm
Comment
-
I think the B-29 would look better than the B-24 does, but still too small. I have seen a 115" B-24 and 120" Lancaster among others in person, and I am always struck by how unimpressive they appear vs. say a 1/5 scale or larger WWII fighter. To me, the B-24 is especially bad, possibly due to the high thin wing and short landing gear. This is what I think rifleman is hinting at.
Comment
Comment