Back to my roots, Balsa!
Collapse
X
-
I have no clue but it's a complex design. Installation of the servos and so on is really challenging, unlike the Top Flite stuff. The Avenger is just not main stream enough I guess. To me it's a classic and well worth the effoert. I'd love to do the Kellogg Avenger but my pockets aren't that deep.
Mike\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"Comment
-
I have no clue but it's a complex design. Installation of the servos and so on is really challenging, unlike the Top Flite stuff. The Avenger is just not main stream enough I guess. To me it's a classic and well worth the effoert. I'd love to do the Kellogg Avenger but my pockets aren't that deep.
Mike
Do you still have the plans for this plane?Comment
-
Comment
-
I wondered if it was a growing trend, or simply the fact that as I'm now I'm able to get back into balsa and wet power systems I'm just thinking about it more and also more aware of others doing the same? That said, we could well be entering a kind of renaissance era, which I'm all for!
Beautiful craftsmanship on the A-10 Dirty Dee, very much an accomplishment to be proud of.
MikeT, very nice looking birds, is the Avenger from the Skyshark kit? and what power system do you have in mind for the SE5A?
I ran the 2nd hand OS Gemini 160 I intend to use in my BUSA Fokker D8 today, needs some work but looks promising.
S.
Comment
-
Sorry MikeT, I see from you posts above (that I somehow missed) that it is a Skyshark kit. Out of all their kits, this was the one I wanted. Interesting points about the build. But how does she fly?
S.Comment
-
\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"Comment
-
Depends how good you are at drafting, but if there are 3 views and full side view of fuselage and plan view of the wing, the formers and ribs could be extrapolated using old fashioned engineering graphic (mechanical drafting) techniques that most have forgotten with the proliferation of computer CAD.
You can come reasonably close from several photos from different angles.
Photogrammetry could 3D model it then slice to get the formers and ribs.
Getting it done either way professionally would be prohibitive. But doing it yourself is amazingly simple once you learn how.FF gliders and rubber power since 1966, CL 1970-1990, RC since 1975.
current planes from 1/2 oz to 22 lbsComment
-
Comment
-
I've been an AutoCAD Draftsman for many many years and still do that today. Over the years I've done quite a few plans for different people. This TBF just might have to be my next design for sure. Thanks,Depends how good you are at drafting, but if there are 3 views and full side view of fuselage and plan view of the wing, the formers and ribs could be extrapolated using old fashioned engineering graphic (mechanical drafting) techniques that most have forgotten with the proliferation of computer CAD.
You can come reasonably close from several photos from different angles.
Photogrammetry could 3D model it then slice to get the formers and ribs.
Getting it done either way professionally would be prohibitive. But doing it yourself is amazingly simple once you learn how.Comment
-
\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"Comment
-
Comment

.png)




Comment