T34 or T34-85?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DavidN
    replied
    Let's put our my out of that spammer thread. I am cleaning out my Russian (extra parts) box. I loaded up whatever I could on to my T34/85 tank.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8270.JPG
Views:	379
Size:	179.1 KB
ID:	329957

    Leave a comment:


  • keilau
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS
    Stock metal HL. I saw your post elsewhere regarding tracks. Whatever route you take, make the sprocket, idler and tracks the same brand. I used Mato tracks on a HL KV-1 and they derailed a number of times, in mild driving. Anybody's metal tracks will last longer than the plastic tanks they run on.
    For several weeks, I could not find any seller offering Heng Long metal track and idler wheel for the T34-85, only the sprocket. I bought the Mato sprocket and idler wheel, but could not make up my mind on the Mato metal track. I finally settled on all Taigen metal track, sprocket and idler wheel. They may use the same source as Imex/Torro for metal parts. I will know if I make a mistake of going with Taigen in a few weeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS
    Stock metal HL. I saw your post elsewhere regarding tracks. Whatever route you take, make the sprocket, idler and tracks the same brand. I used Mato tracks on a HL KV-1 and they derailed a number of times, in mild driving. Anybody's metal tracks will last longer than the plastic tanks they run on.
    I did the similar mistake. I installed the metal Mato idlers, tracks and sprocket onto my HL KV-1. The Mato sprockets were not the same as the HL sprocket so they did not fit well into the HL KV-1 chassis. They fitted too close to the sides. The inner side of the tracks ended up rubbing on the body of the tank and derailed too. I had to modify and moved the sprockets out about 1/8 of an inch for the track to line up straight from front to back.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    Stock metal HL. I saw your post elsewhere regarding tracks. Whatever route you take, make the sprocket, idler and tracks the same brand. I used Mato tracks on a HL KV-1 and they derailed a number of times, in mild driving. Anybody's metal tracks will last longer than the plastic tanks they run on.

    Leave a comment:


  • keilau
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS
    A little run time for my T-34.

    https://youtu.be/jj7ab5ssUHM
    It runs and looks beautiful. I particularly like the track flexing during the run. What is the track you are using?

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    A little run time for my T-34.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    One more thing...

    While researching my voluminous reference material (Google) I saw that some early T34/76 tanks had grab handles, to hang the machine gun fodder (infantry) on. I always wondered how they hung on in videos and movies. Two on the glacis plate, two on each side of the turret. Hey presto!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	T34-85 14.jpg
Views:	448
Size:	226.5 KB
ID:	322263

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Your tank looks great. So "dirty" . Sorry, I don't know how to do recoil setup. I don't even know much about IR :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    Finished the conversion, mostly. The turret rotates 360 degrees, the barrel has servo elevation. An IR bulb is mounted in the barrel. No airsoft. The hatch is hinged. Still needed is servo recoil. If anyone has photos of their homemade recoil setup, please post them! The decals are Archer Fine Transfer dry decals, great since there is no film around the images. I weathered the turret to match the body, but it needs to be run in the dirt since much of the texture of the tank is real dust from battles.

    I didn't have to scrounge anything from the 85 turret, so I can always "update" the tank!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	T34-76 04.jpg
Views:	523
Size:	310.9 KB
ID:	322215

    Click image for larger version

Name:	T34-76 05.jpg
Views:	552
Size:	332.0 KB
ID:	322213

    Click image for larger version

Name:	T34-76 00.jpg
Views:	503
Size:	325.7 KB
ID:	322214

    Click image for larger version

Name:	T34-76 13.jpg
Views:	523
Size:	254.1 KB
ID:	322216


    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Group picture before they are sent off to their units

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7278.jpg
Views:	557
Size:	272.9 KB
ID:	321830Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7274.jpg
Views:	554
Size:	336.8 KB
ID:	321831

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    And here is the SU-100:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7277.jpg
Views:	563
Size:	163.5 KB
ID:	321827Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7273.jpg
Views:	546
Size:	277.1 KB
ID:	321828

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Bob! Thank you sharing Bob. I had just finished painting my T34/76 1943 today. Not much of a work. Just repainting, weathering, putting on decals and coated it. I will work on the mechanical interior when all my parts that I had order arrive.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7268.jpg
Views:	585
Size:	256.7 KB
ID:	321825

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    Interesting thread here, especially about the Trumpeter kits. I bought a T-34/76 turret from an eBay seller in St Petersburg. The exterior is ok, but the interior is a mass of lumps, hard to work with. The mantlet, trunnions and pintles are not symmetrical. Looking at it, and now at pictures of the Trumpeter, I'm guessing someone just made a mold of their turret.

    So, not a good value, I wouldn't recommend it, but when it's done it will undoubtedly look cool! I couldn't remember what color I used for the original T-34/85, but I think I guessed right. When I dirty it up, it should match.



    Oh by the way, since I had the turret off, I decided to alter the gear ring to make it 360 degree capable. Very easy. The gears are rough enough that as long as the teeth look similar, you won't even detect a difference in operation.​

    Leave a comment:


  • Vaseline
    replied
    Good deal

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    I also did the same with my T34/76 1943.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    I have been looking to have the RC 1/16 SU-100 for a long time. My final approach was the Trumpeter kit. It was easy to work with. No warped piece, no drilling, sanding, or dremeling. There are plenty of room for future gun elevation and IR system set up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vaseline
    replied
    I haven't found a resin conversion yet. So if I want one I will just pony up and get a Trumpeter kit.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Originally posted by Vaseline
    Thank you for the time I have always like the Su 100 over the 122 or 152 Thanks again for showing and sharing
    Yes! I like the SU-100 a lot too. It looks better than the bulky SU-122. I have ordered the RC parts. Hopefully I get to finish the paint job and the weathering before the RC parts arrive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vaseline
    replied
    Thank you for the time I have always like the Su 100 over the 122 or 152 Thanks again for showing and sharing

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7253.jpg
Views:	556
Size:	150.6 KB
ID:	321601Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7251.jpg
Views:	596
Size:	165.6 KB
ID:	321602
    More $ but less work than those resin conversion kits :-)

    Leave a comment:

Working...