You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

C-130J Please!

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xviper
    replied
    I fly at 2 fields. One is very plush grass that isn't cut very short. My regular field is just that - prairie field that has been cut down and mowed. It's full of gopher holes (mostly filled in), lumps and bumps. So far, the lowest plane I have is the B-24 and so far, it's working out OK. If HK brings out a C130, I'm afraid I'll have to try one out. I just hope that it is better made, better designed and flies better than their (now defunct) C-47. That one was pretty awful. I couldn't wait to repair it and get rid of it. I now have the Dynam C-47 and even though Dynam is consider an economy brand, theirs is far superior to the HK offering.

    Leave a comment:


  • wvrailfan
    replied
    In listening to "Steve" from HK, he stated that so far they have only flown the test model from grass and it has performed well. He said the mains are about 2 inch wheels and it sounds like they made the LG robust. It may drag on tallish grass, but I think it may be okay on short well manicured grass.

    The real C-130 sits very close to the ground, so you would have to give up some scale appearance to make it taller on the gear.

    I would prefer a 2000 mm from Flightline, but if an HK (Avios) in 1800 mm is what we have, I'll give it a shot and hope for the best.

    I also noted that the guys from Afterhours RC mentioned that they had talked to Alpha about a C-130 in the past. I'd be interested to hear his thoughts on the subject.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hoomi
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    I am somewhat discouraged about their comments about it sitting so low to the ground. I fly off grass and a low plane would turn into a lawn mower.
    I'm betting that scale ground clearance wouldn't work very well on our dirt runway here, either.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by wvrailfan View Post
    Start at about the 1 hour mark. https://www.facebook.com/RCAfterhour...4002911796591/

    From what I gather there will be an unlettered gray version and the Blue Angels support plane version. There are more photos of the Fat Albert version on the Penrith Electric Model Aero Club Facebook page.

    I was hoping for something a little bigger, in the 2000 + size, but this does look pretty good, so I'll likely get one.
    Thanks. I would have never found that. Didn't know what to look for and even if found it, I would not have listened through 1 hr of it to find it. I just don't have the patience to listen to these podcasts.
    I have the 2000mm B-24 and the 1700mm F7F Tigercat and the difference in size between the two is hard to tell unless both are side by side. I am somewhat discouraged about their comments about it sitting so low to the ground. I fly off grass and a low plane would turn into a lawn mower.

    Leave a comment:


  • wvrailfan
    replied
    Start at about the 1 hour mark. https://www.facebook.com/RCAfterhour...4002911796591/

    From what I gather there will be an unlettered gray version and the Blue Angels support plane version. There are more photos of the Fat Albert version on the Penrith Electric Model Aero Club Facebook page.

    I was hoping for something a little bigger, in the 2000 + size, but this does look pretty good, so I'll likely get one.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by wvrailfan View Post
    Sometimes I wonder if other manufacturers and sellers monitor MRC for their product planning? I think HK just announced an 1800mm C-130 via an Afterhours RC video on Facebook.
    There are several HobbyKing Facebook pages. Can you give us a link to this video?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardway
    replied
    I would buy one immediately!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hoomi
    replied
    If I'd had a controller, I could have pretended this one was RC. Low-level pass over Lyman Lake State Park, Arizona, last year. I just happened to be hiking atop a ridge when it flew by, and had the 75-300mm lens on the DSLR. For perspective, it wasn't a very high ridge (neither is one in the background), and as these shots show, I was pretty much level with the plane.

    Leave a comment:


  • wvrailfan
    replied
    Sometimes I wonder if other manufacturers and sellers monitor MRC for their product planning? I think HK just announced an 1800mm C-130 via an Afterhours RC video on Facebook.

    Leave a comment:


  • jobinseattle
    replied
    I would buy one.

    Leave a comment:


  • rifleman_btx
    replied
    Hahaha bet! :) naw I think you make it happen

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    In anticipation of this plane's arrival, I shall not be buying anymore new ones. Saving my money for the ultimate. ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Until then...................here's what I'll be anticipating a 2018 arrival of.

    Maxford C-130 Blue Angels ARF 1/16

    Leave a comment:


  • Mad Baron
    replied
    It would have to have a sound system in it!

    Leave a comment:


  • rifleman_btx
    replied
    Must be built strong enough to fly through a hurricane! Ha! Jokes aside.. This would be awesome!

    Leave a comment:


  • EA-6B Geek
    replied
    That would be cool! VMGR-252 KC-130, I'm in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mad Baron
    replied
    :Cool:C-130!

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulZ
    replied
    Originally posted by Alpha.MotionRC View Post
    2000mm.... it's a must, for a four engine, I think. 1875 low wing worked for the B-17, 2000mm worked for the shoulder mounted B-24. I think a high wing C-130 would be best at 2000mm-2200mm. Anything else would be too small. A man can hope.
    Agreed, it needs to be at least 2000mm. So many customization options possible...an opening rear cargo hatch and a green LED "glow" in the cockpit windows from the heads-up display etc. Let's make it happen!

    Leave a comment:


  • wvrailfan
    replied
    Originally posted by Alpha.MotionRC View Post
    2000mm.... it's a must, for a four engine, I think. 1875 low wing worked for the B-17, 2000mm worked for the shoulder mounted B-24. I think a high wing C-130 would be best at 2000mm-2200mm. Anything else would be too small. A man can hope.
    We haven't been let down by the MRC team yet.

    Oh, and I forgot to add Fat Albert to the list of possible trim packages;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    MAKE IT SO NUMBER ONE :)2200 I WOULD HOPE FOR;)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X