Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What New FlightlineRC or FreeWing Model would you like to see come next!
Collapse
X
-
He only has the 52inch one, which I purchased, and then a 42 inch option currently. I'm always going for the larger birds, they seem to fly better, and more options for customization. I wish he was still offering the 72inch one...
-
Thanx for that FHH..............He also makes a 72" version of which I snagged one two months ago as a pacifier to the FL waiting game. ;)Originally posted by fhhuber View Post
Found a placebo until we can get a better Bronco
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Megajets-RC...AAAOSwNMVaZN~V
Sits waiting to get built though until after I get through some health issues that is slowing down/stopped the garage rebuild.:P
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Haha, I set myself up for that one! Allow me to clarify I'd like me an OV-1 Grumman!LOL
Leave a comment:
-
fhhuber,
Thanks for the link, I just added my second bronco to my hangar.:)
Leave a comment:
-
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Here is a great video of how well an RC Buccaneer would fly. Unfortunately this beauty which the owner spent 5 winters building had a malfunction and met its demise. Had it been a foam plane he could had just ordered new parts and had it rebuilt and flight worthy in a lot shorter time. Even if your the greatest RC pilot in the world all it takes is one glitch to see all that invested time go down into a scrap pile.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
While it's probably not your cup of tea, E-Do does make the Drakken in three different color schemes, and with a PNP or an ARF+ version. The thing that you won't like is they're fixed gear 64 mm, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.Originally posted by Woodcock View Post
Ya know Valk ole buddy. I like the Viggen, the Buckaneer, and especially the Drakken. I like them all a lot, would love to have one. Unfortunate part is I really couldn't endorse either of them. When I recommend a plane to MRC, "WHICH THEY ALWAYS COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY IGNORE CONTINUALLY". I usually try to recommend something that is pretty certain to put them in the black from a business prospective. Please don't confuse the possibility that these three planes may in fact be winners I'm ignorant too, trust me they're are plenty I don't know about. I'm pretty certain the L-39 was a big hit for MRC, and I didn't have a clue. LOL
Two planes jump out at me. First did anyone notice how fast the DC-3's sold out over at HK. All Gone! This might just stimulate a little thought on the MRC's model selection Zars. But believe it or not I'm not recommending a C-47. What I am recommending is a C-46. Doesn't take a marketing genius to figure this one out. The other thing I would hang my hat on is the A-7, and the F-8. Someone out there should have a large version of these planes. In Woody's books they're guaranteed winners! MONEY MAKING WINNERS!
I have given some serious thought to the model selection crew over at MRC of late. I'm convinced they're more interested in making the models, "THEY LIKE, and want to see", instead of making models that are guaranteed to be popular money makers. But it's their game and I respect it.
Last thing I say, is I'm pretty sure this thread is simply a forum for us members to visit and calibrate. Nothing more. MRC could never derive a new model from here by suggestions. We're crazier than a box of frogs here. No consensus what so ever, even in the slightest. Many people suggest planes here that could never logically be produced. Impossible planes, lol.
Then they're is the lets redo the old classic's crowd. Doesn't matter that they're 40 other model companies making them, none of them are good enough. It needs to be a flightLine of FreeWing. Basically it's fun to visit here in this thread, LOL but that's all it is.
OKAY! I've rambled on enough this morning, I hope everyone has a great Saturday. For me, it's the first day in about 3 weeks I haven't had to work, so I'm all good.
Woody
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Ya know Valk ole buddy. I like the Viggen, the Buckaneer, and especially the Drakken. I like them all a lot, would love to have one. Unfortunate part is I really couldn't endorse either of them. When I recommend a plane to MRC, "WHICH THEY ALWAYS COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY IGNORE CONTINUALLY". I usually try to recommend something that is pretty certain to put them in the black from a business prospective. Please don't confuse the possibility that these three planes may in fact be winners I'm ignorant too, trust me they're are plenty I don't know about. I'm pretty certain the L-39 was a big hit for MRC, and I didn't have a clue. LOLOriginally posted by Valkpilot View Post
The FB-111, B-52, B-1B and B-2 all utilize TFR of one form or another and would make ideal models with the exception of the B-2, due to it's color. But I do endorse either the Viggen or Buckaneer in the interest of increasing the international flavor of MRC's line-up. On a side note, do you know what pirates charge for ear piercings?
Two planes jump out at me. First did anyone notice how fast the DC-3's sold out over at HK. All Gone! This might just stimulate a little thought on the MRC's model selection Zars. But believe it or not I'm not recommending a C-47. What I am recommending is a C-46. Doesn't take a marketing genius to figure this one out. The other thing I would hang my hat on is the A-7, and the F-8. Someone out there should have a large version of these planes. In Woody's books they're guaranteed winners! MONEY MAKING WINNERS!
I have given some serious thought to the model selection crew over at MRC of late. I'm convinced they're more interested in making the models, "THEY LIKE, and want to see", instead of making models that are guaranteed to be popular money makers. But it's their game and I respect it.
Last thing I say, is I'm pretty sure this thread is simply a forum for us members to visit and calibrate. Nothing more. MRC could never derive a new model from here by suggestions. We're crazier than a box of frogs here. No consensus what so ever, even in the slightest. Many people suggest planes here that could never logically be produced. Impossible planes, lol.
Then they're is the lets redo the old classic's crowd. Doesn't matter that they're 40 other model companies making them, none of them are good enough. It needs to be a flightLine of FreeWing. Basically it's fun to visit here in this thread, LOL but that's all it is.
OKAY! I've rambled on enough this morning, I hope everyone has a great Saturday. For me, it's the first day in about 3 weeks I haven't had to work, so I'm all good.
Woody
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
The FB-111, B-52, B-1B and B-2 all utilize TFR of one form or another and would make ideal models with the exception of the B-2, due to it's color. But I do endorse either the Viggen or Buckaneer in the interest of increasing the international flavor of MRC's line-up. On a side note, do you know what pirates charge for ear piercings?Originally posted by Evoman View PostI would like to see more jets that not only look sharp but most importantly have a unique flying capability. One of these jets is the Blackburn Buccaneer. It was designed to easily glide over land at low altitudes. What other jets would you recommend with unique flying capability?
The Viggen has been at the top of my list mostly because of its unique flight capabilities.
Leave a comment:
-
I would like to see more jets that not only look sharp but most importantly have a unique flying capability. One of these jets is the Blackburn Buccaneer. It was designed to easily glide over land at low altitudes. What other jets would you recommend with unique flying capability?
The Viggen has been at the top of my list mostly because of its unique flight capabilities.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I think this is interesting stuff. Could be. You know I can say I had never seen a static display plane quite like this one. Over the years I examined it closely. I practically lived at the airport there. That thing had everything in it! Meaning the Engine, Pilot seat, etc. It very well could have been the plane.Originally posted by Hoomi View Post
According to one of the comments under that video, the plane that was on display in Bakersfield had been flown there when the test pilot suffered ill-effects from the prop noise, and made an emergency landing there, rather than continue flying back to Edwards AFB. The post states the USAF didn't retrieve the aircraft for so long, that the airport put it on display, until it was finally reclaimed for its historical significance and sent to the National Air and Space Museum.
I wonder if that was the same flight that led to the quote from the test pilot?
Woody
Interesting stuff, thanks for the feedback mate.
Leave a comment:
-
According to one of the comments under that video, the plane that was on display in Bakersfield had been flown there when the test pilot suffered ill-effects from the prop noise, and made an emergency landing there, rather than continue flying back to Edwards AFB. The post states the USAF didn't retrieve the aircraft for so long, that the airport put it on display, until it was finally reclaimed for its historical significance and sent to the National Air and Space Museum.Originally posted by Woodcock View PostThanks, Hoomi, I watched it. I grew up in Bakersfield Ca. The Bakersfield airport had one of these things standing on a pedestal for 20 or 30 years at the drive-in entry of the airport. When I was 6 years old and past it on the way in, I just saw an airplane. At 11 or 12 I started to think, what sort of plane is that, LOL. Then when I finally started to fly I realized it was a prototype with only two made. Later I heard they had taken it down and sent it to an air museum. When I saw a picture of it a few weeks back I just thought wow, that's my plane, LOL. I literally grew up with that plane. Brought back a lot of memories. It's truly a Unicorn.
Best Regards
Woody
I wonder if that was the same flight that led to the quote from the test pilot?
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks, Hoomi, I watched it. I grew up in Bakersfield Ca. The Bakersfield airport had one of these things standing on a pedestal for 20 or 30 years at the drive-in entry of the airport. When I was 6 years old and past it on the way in, I just saw an airplane. At 11 or 12 I started to think, what sort of plane is that, LOL. Then when I finally started to fly I realized it was a prototype with only two made. Later I heard they had taken it down and sent it to an air museum. When I saw a picture of it a few weeks back I just thought wow, that's my plane, LOL. I literally grew up with that plane. Brought back a lot of memories. It's truly a Unicorn.
Best Regards
Woody
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Here's some video of the Thunderscreech in flight. Some interesting info from the narrator.Originally posted by Woodcock View PostI realized something the other day, when I saw a picture of this plane online somewhere. Really can't remember where. But the picture was a bit stirring, for me. It was a picture of a. "Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech". Yea this is a Unicorn if there ever was one. Some say this was the loudest plane ever built. Well at least the ones that heard it run seemed to think so. Here is the link to read up on it, "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republ...Thunderscreech".
If you read up on it, I'll tell you this. Strangely enough I think this as a propeller model might make a pretty good flying model. LOL This thing actually had a Propeller, Jet Thrust from the rear, and an After burner. The propeller tips were continuously breaking the speed of sound, so to say it was thundering while idling is an understatement. So with that I'll leave you to this test pilots graceful words.
"You aren't big enough and there aren't enough of you to get me in that thing again" Lin Hendrix (test pilot) 1955.

Best Regards
Woody
This was an experimental version of the Republic F-84F Thunderstreak American-built swept-wing turbojet fighter-bomber. While an evolutionary development of ...
Leave a comment:
-
Isn't that the truth! :Cool:Originally posted by Grover54 View Post
No Kidding! Makes you wonder how many Aero engineers ended up in Siberia until they got the CRP to function properly! Hell, they probably just stole the 4-prop CRP design from Howard Hughes who did it with his XF-11 Spy plane almost 10 years earlier! LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL
Leave a comment:



Leave a comment: