P-38 - The Ultimate EPO Lightning

You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Freewing 64mm F-105D Thunderchief

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dkalwishky
    replied
    Will do!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tripod
    replied
    Hey "Warbird Lover" , let me know how the stabilization works (if it works).

    Leave a comment:


  • dkalwishky
    replied
    I’’ve got that receiver in mine, hopefully I’’ll be able to maiden it tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tripod
    replied
    I noticed they offered the Admiral RX600 SP 6 channel receiver with stability plus Gyro as a receiver for the F-105 "Thud". Does any one know if the self leveling will work on "Thud"? If so, then how do you set it up ? I just received my F-105 today! It is going to be my Fathers day present.

    Leave a comment:


  • radfordc
    replied
    Originally posted by Tripod View Post
    Has anyone changed the Freewing F-105 Thud to a separate elevator and airelon servos and also added a rudder servo?
    I was talking to a guy who flew F-100's in Viet Nam. He said that the rudder pedals were just a place to rest your feet. The first time he tried flying a small civilian airplane he almost ran off the runway because he had never had to use the rudder before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boots Whirlygig
    replied
    I was going to go with just taileron control. The flight reports indicating the model was very roll sensitive, as you have all control surfaces involved in roll, but then cancelling pitch. I instead added aileron servos in the wings and replaced one of the existing servos with a reverse servo and Y-connector for elevator control. Just personal preference for me, I’m sure it flies fine with the stock setup.

    Leave a comment:


  • fhhuber
    replied
    A taileron control system will not really seem that much different vs elevator and ailerons, if its set up right.

    The deflection angles needed vary based on moveable surface area compared to fixed area and distance of the control surface vs axis of rotation through the CG and a few other factors.

    Flying at speed reasonably above stall you won't notice much if any difference in how your inputs affect the airplane. Near stall you may find some taileron setups lack enough control surface area for what you want to do. (just as if you had small control surfaces on a trainer and wanted to try 3D maneuvers)

    Leave a comment:


  • Tripod
    replied
    I've never flown using taileron before.Is it much different than using ailerons, elevator and rudder? Instead of "Taileron" maybe it should be called "Elerons" or "Elevalerons". Just saying.

    Leave a comment:


  • radfordc
    replied
    Just hardly isn't much use for a rudder on a jet this size unless you add steerable landing gear, too.

    I have the Crusader and use taileron only and it flys just right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tripod
    replied
    Has anyone changed the Freewing F-105 Thud to a separate elevator and airelon servos and also added a rudder servo?

    Leave a comment:


  • nfield750
    replied
    Its a nice looking model and is quite stable. However the bench tested thrust stated in the manual as 750g is much reduced when installed in the airframe and drops to something like 300g!
    I suspected the cheater holes, which look far too small. Once opened out to twice their original size, I get about 500g thrust on a decent 35C Overlander 1300. It also helps to keep the weight down
    with a smaller battery, so that thrust to weight is nearly 1:1. Flight time is about 3.5mins.

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Originally posted by Aviron View Post
    I feeble launched today, and swished/bent the nose cone. I've managed to pull it back into general shape but now it's a got a few divots/dimples. Is there a filler I can use? Or I was thinking to put a light wrap of fiberglass around the whole thing. Thoughts?
    Use Beacon Foam Finish. ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • Aviron
    replied
    I feeble launched today, and swished/bent the nose cone. I've managed to pull it back into general shape but now it's a got a few divots/dimples. Is there a filler I can use? Or I was thinking to put a light wrap of fiberglass around the whole thing. Thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnVH
    replied
    GB's Freewing F105 from Motion RC, Radar runs!

    Leave a comment:


  • Evoman
    replied
    Originally posted by the snake View Post
    Happy with my successful Rog 12 blade 4's Maiden!
    I loved the sound of the upgraded 12 blade setup. That and the added landing gear gave me new hope for these 64mm jets.
    If MRC ever did a 64mm of a AJS-37 Viggen or something else that would interest me I would buy one with out hesitation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tony617
    replied
    Originally posted by GBLynden View Post
    Mine is too pretty to consider repainting it. Maybe after a crash lol
    Maybe a Vietnam era camo paint scheme if you decide to repaint it.

    Tony

    Leave a comment:


  • GBLynden
    replied
    I love this jet!

    Leave a comment:


  • GBLynden
    replied
    Mine is too pretty to consider repainting it. Maybe after a crash lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Alpha
    replied
    Thanks for posting your reviews and sharing your videos, guys! Much appreciated!

    Is anyone going to repaint theirs in SEA camo?

    Leave a comment:


  • GBLynden
    replied
    We finally got some good flying weather after months of rain and wind. Here is the first video of two from today to share with everyone! It was so nice to spend the day with my friends at two different locations on a in sunny day in Western Washington.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X