E-Flite P-47 Razorback 1.2m (48")

[Sam CS]

So is the only thing you changed to go 4 cell the ESC? Is the motor still stock? I know stock has a 40AMP ESC and I saw another post on how it overheats and goes into overtemp shutdown on a 4S. I have a couple 4S 3000mah batteries I want to use for it. So it would be cheaper to change the ESC. Thanks.

Yes, just the ESC. Never had an issue with overheating. I am also running 4S 5000 Pro.. i think they have around 60C rating. Battery get's a little warm, but that's about it.

[wallacems]

Hi Guys,

Just want to share my setup for Razorback from E-Flite.
I love this plane in FPV and LOS

YouTube link (was out flying, looking for fireworks this summer on the 4th of July)

Here is my setup:

Airframe
- MDL: P-47 Razorback 1.2m/48" (E-Flite)
- ESC: ZTW Gecko 65A ESC with 8A SBEC
- BAT: 4S Admiral Pro 5000mAh
- FC: Eagletree Vector, GPS, PSU
- HDT: Fat Shark 9g 180* Pan Head Tracking Servo
- Canopy: Custom build (Balsa & 1/8 Hobby Plywood, Plexiglass: Bayer)

RC
- TX: FrSky X9D+ with 900MHz Long Range Module
- RX: FrSky 900MHz R9

FPV 3.3GHz
- CAM: RunCam Split 2
- VTX: Finch 3.3-3.4GHz Racing Transmitter 50/200mW Coax V2
- ANT: 3.3/3.4GHz BlueBeam ULTRA Antenna Set (RHCP) - VAS IBCRAZY

Ground station
- Eagletree Eagle Eyes diversity box
- VRX: Two R3300V2 3.3 GHz 16 Channels Pocket-Size Receivers
- ANT1: 3.3/3.4GHz BlueBeam ULTRA Antenna Set (RHCP) - VAS IBCRAZY
- ANT2: TrueRC 3.3/3.4GHz X2-Air 13dBic Directional Antenna (RHCP)
- RPTR: FatShark 5.8ghz Repeater (Ant: Standard clover)
- GGLS: FatShark Dominator V3 FPV Goggles
- Goggles VRX: 5.8 GHz Furious True-D Diversity Receiver V1
- Goggles ANT: Standard clover
- Goggles HDT: FatShark Trinity Head Tracking module

So is the only thing you changed to go 4 cell the ESC? Is the motor still stock? I know stock has a 40AMP ESC and I saw another post on how it overheats and goes into overtemp shutdown on a 4S. I have a couple 4S 3000mah batteries I want to use for it. So it would be cheaper to change the ESC. Thanks.

[Arycon]

Can't stand the livery on the eflite F4U, so much that it pushed me to the dynam then some pricy upgrades. If you guys ever offer a different scheme...

Paint it, dude! I know it is great when they offer multiple livery, but I always end up doing my own scheme anyway. The end results are worth it when that sucker flies by 10' off the deck. Looks fantastic in the air. Here is mine. This was done with Home Depot BEHR flat finish interior latex. I pick my color and have them mix up a sample can that is around 8oz, I think? Around $4 or so per can. They last, too, and one can could easily coat multiple planes. I apply it with a quality brush that doesn't have cheap plastic bristles. Use a painting brush made from hair. The trick is to put it on lightly, evenly and without a ton of strokes. As it dries, brush strokes will disappear.

In my humble opinion, I cannot recommend Dynam. They are cheaper, yes, but the quality, finish and flight characteristics have no comparison to other brands like Flightline, FMS and E-Flite.

*P.S. I forgot to mention graphics are from Callie Graphics, of course. She does great work, and typically my planes are maybe $25 - $35 per livery.

[Sam CS]

Another thing too, you can try a hardware store like Home Depot or Lows and ask for sample paint. They can also mix and match for you. That's what i did for my SU35. Got a perfect match from Home Depot. The down side is that you will have to apply it with a brush unless you have air compressor and a spray gun that will accept latex paint.

[Steelon Steel]

I wish more planes came in paint but decals in the box with maybe 2-3 livery options. Like the Corsair, I don’t really want the Korean War era decals (at this time).

[boomer108]

Thanks Sam! I actually got some craft paint from Michaels Craft store in cobalt blue matte finish and is also very close. Thanks again!

[Sam CS]

Does anyone know what color blue the cowling is on the plane? I need to do some touch up and I can't get a color match from Home Depot because there is no flat surface.

Testors 1106-RM11061011_0616 Flat Cobalt Blue paint
This is not the exact match but pretty close. I also had trouble locating the right color.
Hope this helps

[uuc328]

It is indeed a great flying airplane. I prefer Eflite's Corsair in the same size, but the Razorback doesn't disappoint, either. Its wide gear stance is especially helpful in sticky landing and taxiing situations.

Can't stand the livery on the eflite F4U, so much that it pushed me to the dynam then some pricy upgrades. If you guys ever offer a different scheme...

[Alpha]

It is indeed a great flying airplane. I prefer Eflite's Corsair in the same size, but the Razorback doesn't disappoint, either. Its wide gear stance is especially helpful in sticky landing and taxiing situations.

[boomer108]

Is this the official thread on the plane? Failed to locate anything other than FS threads while searching, maybe I'm doing something wrong.

Your in the right place, that was my complaint in post #17 seems it got off track. Welcome to the Squawk and if I can help you with anything let me know. I've flown the E-Flight P-47 for two years. Great plane.

[uuc328]

Is this the official thread on the plane? Failed to locate anything other than FS threads while searching, maybe I'm doing something wrong.

[boomer108]

Does anyone know what color blue the cowling is on the plane? I need to do some touch up and I can't get a color match from Home Depot because there is no flat surface.

[Sam CS]

Mid Air collision with Spitfire last summer

[PilotAndy1994]

flyAA, hold on, i don't want to mislead you. This is not an HD FPV system. I am using standard 5.8 analog. Its just my flight cam is Runcam Split which is your basic "HD action" cam designed for FPV. The footage you see in the video is recorded onboard in HD format, onto a flash card or also known as mini-memory card you have in your cell phone. The picture i see in my goggles is significantly reduced in resolution. Its the same picture only its 640x480
Here is a good example of what it looks like:

https://youtu.be/hvsA9vu2pro

This vid was taken with Hyperion cam, not the Runcam Split but idea is the same and this is recording from my goggles DVR.

There are 2 systems available for FPV. HD and analog. HD systems are currently not worth the money IMO unless you are into pro-racing. They are overpriced and still being actively developed. Range is not that great either.
Here are some examples of HD systems. FPVBlue is very promissing... something i would be interested in upcoming years for sure:

https://fpv.blue/

or
Connex ProSight HD

https://www.getfpv.com/the-connex-prosight-hd-vision-kit.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxMeO6tui3wIV9R6tBh1ArgucEAAYAiAAEgIDRfD_BwE

You should do your own research to see what and how it works. Also, I am always happy to answer any questions you might have to help you understand how things work.
One thing to keep inmind regarding HD FPV is that when you lose your HD video signal while flying, the picture/frame freezes. It will unfreeze when you regain signal but, by that time it might be too late. With analog you still see the picture only with a lot of static. Even though you are receiving a very weak signal, you still can see where you are flying.
Another thing to keep in mind is that HD or analog use radio frequencies that require you to get HAM license. Currently (and i could be wrong unless something changed within 2018) we can fly without license on 5.8Ghz at 25mw of pwr max.(this is actualy enough to get you started in FPV) Getting HAM license is easy... very easy test. Most people just don't want to take the time and drive to the radio club lol.

BUMMER! I watched the p-47 hd footage and immediately wanted to buy the setup and put it on my mustang....but seeing the actual footage is really disappointing.....So amazing what difference there is...Hopefully hd will come on the market soon at a reasonable price.....

[rifleman_btx]

Yes, the video i made is what you see through the goggles.

[flyAA]

flyAA, hold on, i don't want to mislead you. This is not an HD FPV system. I am using standard 5.8 analog. Its just my flight cam is Runcam Split which is your basic "HD action" cam designed for FPV. The footage you see in the video is recorded onboard in HD format, onto a flash card or also known as mini-memory card you have in your cell phone. The picture i see in my goggles is significantly reduced in resolution. Its the same picture only its 640x480
Here is a good example of what it looks like:

https://youtu.be/hvsA9vu2pro

This vid was taken with Hyperion cam, not the Runcam Split but idea is the same and this is recording from my goggles DVR.

There are 2 systems available for FPV. HD and analog. HD systems are currently not worth the money IMO unless you are into pro-racing. They are overpriced and still being actively developed. Range is not that great either.
Here are some examples of HD systems. FPVBlue is very promissing... something i would be interested in upcoming years for sure:

https://fpv.blue/

or
Connex ProSight HD

https://www.getfpv.com/the-connex-prosight-hd-vision-kit.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxMeO6tui3wIV9R6tBh1ArgucEAAYAiAAEgIDRfD_BwE

You should do your own research to see what and how it works. Also, I am always happy to answer any questions you might have to help you understand how things work.
One thing to keep inmind regarding HD FPV is that when you lose your HD video signal while flying, the picture/frame freezes. It will unfreeze when you regain signal but, by that time it might be too late. With analog you still see the picture only with a lot of static. Even though you are receiving a very weak signal, you still can see where you are flying.
Another thing to keep in mind is that HD or analog use radio frequencies that require you to get HAM license. Currently (and i could be wrong unless something changed within 2018) we can fly without license on 5.8Ghz at 25mw of pwr max.(this is actualy enough to get you started in FPV) Getting HAM license is easy... very easy test. Most people just don't want to take the time and drive to the radio club lol.

Oh ok. I was under the impression the video you posted was what you are seeing through the goggles. I’ve always been intrigued by fpv but my sticking point is the picture quality. Living in an HD world I just can’t get past the low resolution fpv set ups. I guess I’m going to wait a while for the technology to catch up. I was ready to jump in head first when i thought your video was what you saw through your goggles lol.

Thanks so much for all your help!

[boomer108]

Hey guys this is no longer a Eflight P-47 Razorback thread but a FPV thread that's where it should be.;)

[Sam CS]

Thanks dude, i will have to check it out. I was hoping to find good OSD. Vector is a bit pricey. It's an awesome product and i totally love it, it's just pain on the ass to swap it between models.
The only problem i had with Vector is that it just wouldn't fly waypoints. I installed latest updates still no go. It looks like GPS is not updating as fast as the aircraft is turning so, it ends up chasing its tail in a circle.
Maybe later, during summer i will mess with it again.

[rifleman_btx]

This isnt any FC just a skylark tiny osd. If i do a fc system i think from now on itll be a vector. The camera is a pan and tilt 700tvl fatshark system with a 600mw transmitter.

[Sam CS]

Right on, heres my P38 setup.:Cool:

Matt, what FC are you using? Mind sharing your setup in detail?
I used EagleTree Vector but, its a bit expensive.
I also found that Vector's PSU is very good at supplying power for your FPV needs and there are no noise at all. It peaks at 140amps max, don't remember what is normal operating range but i use it in all my FPV models.
I was looking at other OSD options... maybe something cheaper.