Avios Grumman Albatross!

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xviper
    Hobby Squawk Regular

    • Jan 2014
    • 8749
    • Calgary, Canada
    • Send PM

    #41
    Originally posted by tab28682
    I am a happy Avios C-130 owner and my Albatross is on the way!
    Did you ever own an Avios Sea Fury? I never got the C-130 but I was a very UNhappy Avios Sea Fury owner BUT I am excited about my Albatross arriving on Monday.

    Comment

    • Bajora
      AA6JB

      • Jan 2016
      • 462
      • Sonoma County, California
      • Send PM

      #42
      Water Ops!

      The real world Albatross is listed as being able to optimally operate in 4 foot seas, with more extreme seas of 8-10 feet possible but JATO required for takeoff.

      It was not exactly calm this evening .. winds out of north at 8-10 maybe? But the Albatross handled the chop with no major issues. The reversing throttles and differential thrust feature definitely came in handy. The water rudder struggled to overcome the winds at times, but with the diff flipped on ... no problem! :cool:







      Comment

      • tab28682
        RC addict

        • Jul 2017
        • 334
        • Fort Worth, TX
        • Send PM

        #43
        Originally posted by xviper
        Did you ever own an Avios Sea Fury? I never got the C-130 but I was a very UNhappy Avios Sea Fury owner BUT I am excited about my Albatross arriving on Monday.
        Nope. I gave that one a pass. Been a while since the early problematic Avios offerings. I like the C-130 a lot. The servos could be better, but everything works great on my model.

        Comment

        • Woodcock
          Old Returning Pilot

          • Apr 2018
          • 830
          • SoCal
          • Send PM

          #44
          You can't deny that Hobbyking has given us a couple of very cool planes in the C-130, and Albatross. I don't know who is making these calls over there, but in my opinion, their doing a better job at this than the Motion RC folks. Heck, I personally will get that Buffalo too if it ever goes on sale. I'm grateful, to be honest. I don't fault Motion for it. It's just a matter of taste. Their cool, for the most part, just isn't my cool. I do love the up and coming F-18 though. Honestly. No offense intended.

          Best Regards
          Woody

          Comment

          • JohnVH
            Hobby Squawk Student Pilot

            • Nov 2017
            • 259
            • Lynden, WA
            • Send PM

            #45
            Originally posted by Bajora
            The water rudder struggled to overcome the winds at times, but with the diff flipped on ... no problem! :cool:

            The water rudder is on wrong, maybe thats the problem?

            Comment

            • James
              Administrator

              • Aug 2017
              • 1543
              • Send PM

              #46
              Originally posted by Woodcock
              You can't deny that Hobbyking has given us a couple of very cool planes in the C-130, and Albatross. I don't know who is making these calls over there, but in my opinion, their doing a better job at this than the Motion RC folks. Heck, I personally will get that Buffalo too if it ever goes on sale. I'm grateful, to be honest. I don't fault Motion for it. It's just a matter of taste. Their cool, for the most part, just isn't my cool. I do love the up and coming F-18 though. Honestly. No offense intended.

              Best Regards
              Woody
              Never apologize for expressing your opinions Woodcock! This is definitely a good looking aircraft, and I am sure some of what we have coming in the future will be more "your cool". But happy to see so many great offerings from all over for all pilots to enjoy

              Comment

              • Evoman
                Member

                • Mar 2016
                • 567
                • Send PM

                #47
                I had been waiting for an RC model of the Albatross because I always found it to be a great seaplane design. However one of the main features I was hoping for it have was retracts so it could actually be flown off a runway just like the real deal.
                So unless they come out with a retract add-on kit I have not interest in it.

                Comment

                • uscanuck1xa
                  Member

                  • Jan 2018
                  • 100
                  • Memphis, TN
                  • Send PM

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Evoman
                  I had been waiting for an RC model of the Albatross because I always found it to be a great seaplane design. However one of the main features I was hoping for it have was retracts so it could actually be flown off a runway just like the real deal.
                  So unless they come out with a retract add-on kit I have not interest in it.
                  Tom Hunt is developing a retract set that will work with this model. You can see what he is doing in the Albatross thread in the Waterplanes forum on RCGroups. It will not be a kit, however he will be providing the files so modelers can 3D print the appropriate parts. Other pieces such as the retract units, wheels, etc. will be up to the modeler to purchase on their own as well, although he is clearly specifying what he is using. It is a a very slick setup!
                   

                  Comment

                  • wvrailfan
                    HobbySquawk Pilot

                    • Sep 2013
                    • 682
                    • West Virginia
                    • Send PM

                    #49
                    Mine arrived today. Opened it just long enough to check it out. It was well packed and individual parts protected in plastic bags. Mine shows no signs of damage.

                    From just a quick check, the paint looks very good. kudos to Avios for actually painting the white portion and not just leaving it bare foam. The paint appears to be applied smoothly and the yellow, which I was concerned may be to lemony, is a nice rich shade of yellow.

                    I plan to eventually wrap this plane and letter it as a WV Air Guard ship, however, I think I will have to put it together and fly it as is for a short while, just because it looks that good.

                    Comment

                    • Bajora
                      AA6JB

                      • Jan 2016
                      • 462
                      • Sonoma County, California
                      • Send PM

                      #50
                      Originally posted by JohnVH

                      The water rudder is on wrong, maybe thats the problem?
                      Nah .. I wanted a more shallow draught, for shallower water operations... and a longer net moment, for more turning authority. Since the real one didn’t even have a water rudder, I am pretty sure you cannot say that there is a “wrong” way to mount it.

                      ;)

                      Comment

                      • rampage
                        Member

                        • Jan 2016
                        • 45
                        • Send PM

                        #51
                        Just in case nobody's paying attention to the RCGroups thread(s), here are the Home Depot paint matches.




                        Comment

                        • Bajora
                          AA6JB

                          • Jan 2016
                          • 462
                          • Sonoma County, California
                          • Send PM

                          #52
                          RC Who?!:P

                          Comment

                          • wvrailfan
                            HobbySquawk Pilot

                            • Sep 2013
                            • 682
                            • West Virginia
                            • Send PM

                            #53
                            Originally posted by Bajora

                            Nah .. I wanted a more shallow draught, for shallower water operations... and a longer net moment, for more turning authority. Since the real one didn’t even have a water rudder, I am pretty sure you cannot say that there is a “wrong” way to mount it.

                            ;)
                            Did you by chance do any on water taxi test without the water rudder? I had a Dynam Catalina and flew it from water without the water rudder. As long as you kept up a little speed on the water it would turn okay without the water rudder.

                            Jim

                            Comment

                            • xviper
                              Hobby Squawk Regular

                              • Jan 2014
                              • 8749
                              • Calgary, Canada
                              • Send PM

                              #54
                              Originally posted by wvrailfan

                              Did you by chance do any on water taxi test without the water rudder? I had a Dynam Catalina and flew it from water without the water rudder. As long as you kept up a little speed on the water it would turn okay without the water rudder.

                              Jim
                              I have a Canadair CL-415 water bomber. It's a twin (without throttle diff) and I can turn that thing on snow and ice by just maxing out the rudder and blipping the throttle. Wouldn't that work on water?

                              Comment

                              • wvrailfan
                                HobbySquawk Pilot

                                • Sep 2013
                                • 682
                                • West Virginia
                                • Send PM

                                #55
                                Originally posted by xviper
                                I have a Canadair CL-415 water bomber. It's a twin (without throttle diff) and I can turn that thing on snow and ice by just maxing out the rudder and blipping the throttle. Wouldn't that work on water?
                                I'm thinking yes. As I said, the Catalina turns fine just using the rudder as long as I keep some air flow over it. But since no two planes are exactly the same, I thought I'd ask if Bajora had tested the HU-16 using only the air rudder. Just curious, and I really don't like the looks of that big water rudder.

                                Comment

                                • wvrailfan
                                  HobbySquawk Pilot

                                  • Sep 2013
                                  • 682
                                  • West Virginia
                                  • Send PM

                                  #56
                                  I got to maiden mine from grass today. What a sweet flying plane, well done Avios!

                                  I am really looking forward to getting down to the river to try it off of water now.

                                  I removed some of the lettering from mine, waiting on replacement decals from Callie. Decided to just change the tail number to Alameda 911.

                                  I'm also going to paint the water rudder blue gray to see if I can make it a little less noticeable. I may even try to cut one from Lexan.

                                  Comment

                                  • xviper
                                    Hobby Squawk Regular

                                    • Jan 2014
                                    • 8749
                                    • Calgary, Canada
                                    • Send PM

                                    #57
                                    All dressed up and no place to go. Still a bit cold and very windy today. Oddly enough, this plane will never float on water (except the frozen kind).

                                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3343.JPG
Views:	1611
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	188688

                                    Comment

                                    • Bajora
                                      AA6JB

                                      • Jan 2016
                                      • 462
                                      • Sonoma County, California
                                      • Send PM

                                      #58
                                      Originally posted by wvrailfan

                                      I'm thinking yes. As I said, the Catalina turns fine just using the rudder as long as I keep some air flow over it. But since no two planes are exactly the same, I thought I'd ask if Bajora had tested the HU-16 using only the air rudder. Just curious, and I really don't like the looks of that big water rudder.
                                      Sorry ... I have not. Since I have the differential thrust all set-up, I have been falling back to that.

                                      Comment

                                      • rampage
                                        Member

                                        • Jan 2016
                                        • 45
                                        • Send PM

                                        #59
                                        I maidened mine off water this weekend. No water rudder, differential throttle. It's a little squirrelly on takeoff but that's just learning then plane. The throttle differential is extremely effective.

                                        I still have one ESC that's braking. Other than that, good to go. Way too much ailerons by the book too. Slightly nose heavy at the 80mm recommended CG. Needed a few clicks of down elevator to trim.

                                        Comment

                                        • TiredIronGRB
                                          Post-Apocalyptic Tactical Consultant

                                          • Jan 2016
                                          • 3986
                                          • Church Hill, Tennessee
                                          • Send PM

                                          #60
                                          I really like this plane...I did have to make some dummy radials for it, I used HobbyKing B-17 radials and trimmed the center :Cool:



                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_172728063_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	151.8 KB ID:	189048

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181816737_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	54.1 KB ID:	189039

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181933535_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	90.4 KB ID:	189041

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181730812_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	73.6 KB ID:	189042

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181956665_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	89.3 KB ID:	189049

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181946450_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	74.5 KB ID:	189043

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175118817_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	67.6 KB ID:	189044

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175111560_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	64.3 KB ID:	189046

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181904914_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	107.4 KB ID:	189047

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181754365_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	114.1 KB ID:	189050

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175633098_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	201.4 KB ID:	189051

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175105737_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	137.3 KB ID:	189052

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175815953_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	139.7 KB ID:	189054

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181719256_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	183.4 KB ID:	189055

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_181744934_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	162.6 KB ID:	189056

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190402_175536334_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	209.3 KB ID:	189059

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190406_193953728_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	253.0 KB ID:	189057

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190406_194555547_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	236.4 KB ID:	189053

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190406_201248661_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	79.5 KB ID:	189040

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190406_201320832_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	117.8 KB ID:	189045

                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	20190406_210624844_iOS.jpg Views:	0 Size:	209.0 KB ID:	189058
                                          TiredIron Aviation
                                          Tired Iron Military Vehicles

                                          Comment

                                          Working...