Originally posted by tab28682
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Avios Grumman Albatross!
Collapse
X
-
Water Ops!
The real world Albatross is listed as being able to optimally operate in 4 foot seas, with more extreme seas of 8-10 feet possible but JATO required for takeoff.
It was not exactly calm this evening .. winds out of north at 8-10 maybe? But the Albatross handled the chop with no major issues. The reversing throttles and differential thrust feature definitely came in handy. The water rudder struggled to overcome the winds at times, but with the diff flipped on ... no problem! :cool:
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by xviper View PostDid you ever own an Avios Sea Fury? I never got the C-130 but I was a very UNhappy Avios Sea Fury owner BUT I am excited about my Albatross arriving on Monday.
Comment
-
You can't deny that Hobbyking has given us a couple of very cool planes in the C-130, and Albatross. I don't know who is making these calls over there, but in my opinion, their doing a better job at this than the Motion RC folks. Heck, I personally will get that Buffalo too if it ever goes on sale. I'm grateful, to be honest. I don't fault Motion for it. It's just a matter of taste. Their cool, for the most part, just isn't my cool. I do love the up and coming F-18 though. Honestly. No offense intended.
Best Regards
Woody
Comment
-
Originally posted by Woodcock View PostYou can't deny that Hobbyking has given us a couple of very cool planes in the C-130, and Albatross. I don't know who is making these calls over there, but in my opinion, their doing a better job at this than the Motion RC folks. Heck, I personally will get that Buffalo too if it ever goes on sale. I'm grateful, to be honest. I don't fault Motion for it. It's just a matter of taste. Their cool, for the most part, just isn't my cool. I do love the up and coming F-18 though. Honestly. No offense intended.
Best Regards
Woody
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I had been waiting for an RC model of the Albatross because I always found it to be a great seaplane design. However one of the main features I was hoping for it have was retracts so it could actually be flown off a runway just like the real deal.
So unless they come out with a retract add-on kit I have not interest in it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evoman View PostI had been waiting for an RC model of the Albatross because I always found it to be a great seaplane design. However one of the main features I was hoping for it have was retracts so it could actually be flown off a runway just like the real deal.
So unless they come out with a retract add-on kit I have not interest in it.
Main gear proto complete for the new Avios Grumman Albatross. Using a Taranis TX I was able to program in the retraction like a gear door cycler which I will...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Mine arrived today. Opened it just long enough to check it out. It was well packed and individual parts protected in plastic bags. Mine shows no signs of damage.
From just a quick check, the paint looks very good. kudos to Avios for actually painting the white portion and not just leaving it bare foam. The paint appears to be applied smoothly and the yellow, which I was concerned may be to lemony, is a nice rich shade of yellow.
I plan to eventually wrap this plane and letter it as a WV Air Guard ship, however, I think I will have to put it together and fly it as is for a short while, just because it looks that good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnVH View Post
The water rudder is on wrong, maybe thats the problem?
;)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bajora View Post
Nah .. I wanted a more shallow draught, for shallower water operations... and a longer net moment, for more turning authority. Since the real one didn’t even have a water rudder, I am pretty sure you cannot say that there is a “wrong” way to mount it.
;)
Jim
Comment
-
Originally posted by wvrailfan View Post
Did you by chance do any on water taxi test without the water rudder? I had a Dynam Catalina and flew it from water without the water rudder. As long as you kept up a little speed on the water it would turn okay without the water rudder.
Jim
Comment
-
Originally posted by xviper View PostI have a Canadair CL-415 water bomber. It's a twin (without throttle diff) and I can turn that thing on snow and ice by just maxing out the rudder and blipping the throttle. Wouldn't that work on water?
Comment
-
I got to maiden mine from grass today. What a sweet flying plane, well done Avios!
I am really looking forward to getting down to the river to try it off of water now.
I removed some of the lettering from mine, waiting on replacement decals from Callie. Decided to just change the tail number to Alameda 911.
I'm also going to paint the water rudder blue gray to see if I can make it a little less noticeable. I may even try to cut one from Lexan.5 Photos
Comment
-
Originally posted by wvrailfan View Post
I'm thinking yes. As I said, the Catalina turns fine just using the rudder as long as I keep some air flow over it. But since no two planes are exactly the same, I thought I'd ask if Bajora had tested the HU-16 using only the air rudder. Just curious, and I really don't like the looks of that big water rudder.
Comment
-
I maidened mine off water this weekend. No water rudder, differential throttle. It's a little squirrelly on takeoff but that's just learning then plane. The throttle differential is extremely effective.
I still have one ESC that's braking. Other than that, good to go. Way too much ailerons by the book too. Slightly nose heavy at the 80mm recommended CG. Needed a few clicks of down elevator to trim.
Comment
Comment