Announcement

**Rocketeer** · Aug 13, 2014, 10:48 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings Baron,

Great Point!

I have found this to be true of the Roc Hobby Waco as well. If one has a bit longer screws on hand I would recommend implementing/acquiring them as well.

Clear Skies,

Bill L.
in Okla.

**lvflyer** · Sep 24, 2014, 09:08 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Hello Tom.MotionRC

You said in an email dated August 9th, 2014 that due to popular demand, you would be getting Dynam Wacos on your next shipment. Is that still true and when will that be? I want to order at least 2 when they come.

Please reply

Thank-you,

Ron - lvflyer

**Rocketeer** · Sep 25, 2014, 10:33 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings,

A valid question.......

I believe there are quite a few avid MRC customers anxious to see the response.

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

**lvflyer** · Sep 25, 2014, 11:23 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

Thank-you Bill - Incidentally, my RocHobby FMS Waco will be delivered, per UPS, tomorrow. Anyway, I was told by someone on the phone on Monday that they probably will not carry the Dynam Waco due to "competition" with the RocHobby FMS Waco. I saw this discussion on the forum last night so I thought I needed to respond and get clarification because it appears we have "conflicting" answers to this topic

Ron - lvflyer

**OV10** · Sep 26, 2014, 09:16 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

OK guys, here's the final word I just got on the Dynam Waco. This from Alpha Enos who responded to a message I sent to the general manager of Motion about this plane.
Regards,
CB

Thank you for contacting us, we sincerely appreciate your feedback and we always enjoy hearing from our customer family. You'll be pleased to know that we recently ordered the Dynam Waco and they are in production now. We should have them in 6-7 weeks. Please check our website again around that time for the latest information.

Thank you,
Alpha

**Rocketeer** · Sep 26, 2014, 09:22 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings OV10,

AWESOME!!!!!!! <smiley image="anim_jump.gif"/>

That is outstanding news!!! Thanks for sharing!!!!

Now, I have to go and update my Christmas List!!! <smiley image="anim_claps.gif"/>

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

***Marco Polo*** · Sep 26, 2014, 08:33 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Dynam Waco has been ordered. It is currently in production at Dynam's factory and should ship in two weeks. Adding 30 days for transit to our warehouse we expect it to be available for purchase in approx 6 weeks provided no shipping and/or port delays. Thanks for the input and continued support.

Mark

**StarHopper** · Sep 26, 2014, 10:26 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Name me another company that comes thru for ya like that!
From the listening, to the <i>fait accompli</i> - Hear Hear!!

**Rocketeer** · Sep 27, 2014, 01:47 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings Mark,

I was wondering, if you guy's will be putting up a 'coming soon' splash page for the Waco and/or be providing a "notify me when it arrives" link??

Thanks,

Bill L.
in Okla.

**StormyDog1962** · Sep 27, 2014, 10:29 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Guys good news, we will be stocking the 50" Dynam Waco. We hope to have them in stock in 6 weeks. I believe one of these may be in my future, but you guys get yours first. Thanks to all of you, we appreciate your business and support.

Wayne

**wvrailfan** · Sep 28, 2014, 03:29 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

You guys waiting to order the Dynam WACO will not be disappointed. Mine has well over 200 flights and is still going strong. It is a great flying plane.

It s one of my planes that, if lost, I would replace as soon as possible. And knowing MRC is going to have it makes me feel better as I continue to put flights on mine.

I modded mine to represent a PT-14, including wrapping it with vinyl.

Jim

Attached Files

**Rocketeer** · Sep 28, 2014, 06:44 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings,

Very nicely done. I too have a Waco which I simply adore however, at first glance I would never have suspected yours to be anything other than what it appears to be.

Very Cool!!!

Thanks for sharing.

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

**wvrailfan** · Sep 28, 2014, 09:21 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Thanks.

Stearman got the vast majority of defense contracts for trainers up to and through WW II. But a few WACOs ended up as trainers. The Army designated the Stearman, PT-17 and the WACO, PT-14. The Army WACOs had a simplified cowl or no cowl at all and also had a simpler and sturdier landing gear. I tried to duplicate the major spotting differences between the civilian WACO and the military version.

Jim

**lvflyer** · Sep 28, 2014, 09:38 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Hello wvrailfan and Rocketeer - Can you tell me on a scale of 1-5, 5 being the hardest to fly, how you would rate the Dynam Waco's flight characteristics?

Thank-you - Ron - lvflyer

**wvrailfan** · Sep 28, 2014, 10:53 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Even though the WACO is a very capable plane when it comes to aerobatics, it also slows down nicely for landings and can be very docile. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would rate it's difficulty to fly at about a 2.25.

It's not a good first plane, but if you can fly a 4 ch trainer comfortably, this would be an okay 2nd or 3rd plane.

There is an active thread on this plane, with a lot of info, on RC Groups http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1706634

Jim

**lvflyer** · Sep 28, 2014, 11:02 PM

Re: Dynam WACO

Envelope-to: ml-node+s1075610n4341h87@n5.nabble.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:02:15 -0700
Received: from mx1.trimedx.com ([216.37.5.158] helo=mail.trimedx.com)
by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com>)
id 1XYT6F-0004ws-Id
for ml-node+s1075610n4341h87@n5.nabble.com; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:02:15 -0700
Received: from NF07MBXPRD03X.corporate.trimedx.com
([fe80::4472:1d39:5261:281e]) by nf07excprd02x.corporate.trimedx.com
([fe80::7c74:de76:367d:63f0%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 29 Sep
2014 01:02:01 -0400
From: "Merkle, Ron W." <Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com>
To: "wvrailfan [via Motion RC Forum]" <ml-node+s1075610n4341h87@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: Dynam WACO
Thread-Topic: Dynam WACO
Thread-Index: AQHP22NQljftaLeTsEKlX7MS4BCQXZwXud+AgAAVJID//783FA==
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:02:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9DFED2FB-CE45-4CDF-9485-5E91C56AF834@trimedx.com>
References: <1407612825537-3101.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407860763495-3137.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407860820222-3138.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407895408295-3149.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407899966121-3152.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407903918292-3154.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407944684767-3159.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407948525669-3164.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1411939782741-4329.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1411961893196-4338.post@n5.nabble.com>,<1411966432840-4341.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1411966432840-4341.post@n5.nabble.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.37.5.158
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on joe.nabble.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false

Thank-you Sir - I am putting together the FMS RocHobby Waco I got on Friday=
because nobody had the Dynam Waco in stock. Some people were saying the FM=
S Waco was a little easier to fly than the Dynam.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:53 PM, wvrailfan [via Motion RC Forum] <ml-node+s1075=
610n4341h87@n5.nabble.com<mailto:ml-node+s1075610n4341h87@n5.nabble.com>> w=
rote:

Even though the WACO is a very capable plane when it comes to aerobatics, i=
t also slows down nicely for landings and can be very docile. On a scale o=
f 1 to 5, I would rate it's difficulty to fly at about a 2.25.

It's not a good first plane, but if you can fly a 4 ch trainer comfortably,=
this would be an okay 2nd or 3rd plane.

There is an active thread on this plane, with a lot of info, on RC Groups =
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3D1706634

Jim

________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion be=
low:
http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n5.nabble.com/Dynam-WACO-tp2964p4341.html
To unsubscribe from Dynam WACO, click here<http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n=
5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=3Dunsubscribe_by_code&node=3 D29=
64&code=3Dcm9uLm1lcmtsZUB0cmltZWR4LmNvbXwyOTY0fC0x NjcxNzM4Nzcz>.
NAML<http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?=
macro=3Dmacro_viewer&id=3Dinstant_html%21nabble%3A email.naml&base=3Dnabble.=
naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nab=
ble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=3D notify_subscribers%21nabb=
le%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_ins

**Hippie 64** · Sep 29, 2014, 06:08 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

The PT-14 is also a beautiful Bi-Plane . I really like the detail with the rigging , it just adds so much to the overall presence of the plane . I've heard nothing but good words for it as well

**Rocketeer** · Sep 29, 2014, 10:37 AM

Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings,

I would have to agree and place the degree of difficulty on the Dynam WACO at 2ish.

As mentioned the Wacos' have a docile flight characteristic and tend to fly on "rails" as the saying goes.
IF, you are already comfortable flying a 4-channel aircraft and the characteristics associated with taking off and landing 'tail-draggers.'

I have both the Dynam (although I plan to obtain another one when MRC receives them) and the Roc Hobby and I adore them both. For appearances, I like the Roc Hobby due to the very pleasing effect of the rigging on it. However, I very much like the size and visibility of the Dynam version with its additional 10" of wingspan.

Either way, you will enjoy flying the Waco.

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

**lvflyer** · Sep 29, 2014, 11:53 AM

RE: Dynam WACO

Envelope-to: ml-node+s1075610n4346h42@n5.nabble.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:53:32 -0700
Received: from mx1.trimedx.com ([216.37.5.158] helo=mail.trimedx.com)
by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com>)
id 1XYf8e-000643-K7
for ml-node+s1075610n4346h42@n5.nabble.com; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:53:32 -0700
Received: from NF07MBXPRD03X.corporate.trimedx.com
([fe80::4472:1d39:5261:281e]) by NF07EXCPRD01X.corporate.trimedx.com ([::1])
with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:53:18 -0400
From: "Merkle, Ron W." <Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com>
To: "Rocketeer [via Motion RC Forum]" <ml-node+s1075610n4346h42@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: RE: Dynam WACO
Thread-Topic: Dynam WACO
Thread-Index: AQHP22NQljftaLeTsEKlX7MS4BCQXZwXud+AgAAVJICAAMSLAP//z7R3
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:53:18 +0000
Message-ID: <BAACF082DFCE2B48A7C4A5716F98BACA7AB1A621@nf07mbxp rd03x.corporate.trimedx.com>
References: <1407860763495-3137.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407860820222-3138.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407895408295-3149.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407899966121-3152.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407903918292-3154.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407944684767-3159.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1407948525669-3164.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1411939782741-4329.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1411961893196-4338.post@n5.nabble.com>
<1411966432840-4341.post@n5.nabble.com>,<1412008640498-4346.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1412008640498-4346.post@n5.nabble.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.130.3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.37.5.158
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ron.Merkle@trimedx.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on joe.nabble.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false

Hello Bill (Rocketeer) - Thank-you for your input and advice. I am putting =
together the RocHobby I received on Friday. I was wondering, I put the rigg=
ings on my Dynam Tiger Moth (with the help of my wife) but the RocHobby Wac=
o looks to be harder and i was thinking about leaving them off. What is you=
r opinion? Also, how was the build of the RocHobby compared to the Dynam? S=
ince I put together both the Dynam Tiger Moth and Dynam Gee Bee, which I th=
ought were great builds, the RocHobby build seems more "involved"

Ron - lvflyer

________________________________
From: Rocketeer [via Motion RC Forum] [ml-node+s1075610n4346h42@n5.nabble.c=
om]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 9:37 AM
To: Merkle, Ron W.
Subject: Re: Dynam WACO

Greetings,

I would have to agree and place the degree of difficulty on the Dynam WACO =
at 2ish.

As mentioned the Wacos' have a docile flight characteristic and tend to fly=
on "rails" as the saying goes.
IF, you are already comfortable flying a 4-channel aircraft and the charact=
eristics associated with taking off and landing 'tail-draggers.'

I have both the Dynam (although I plan to obtain another one when MRC recei=
ves them) and the Roc Hobby and I adore them both. For appearances, I like =
the Roc Hobby due to the very pleasing effect of the rigging on it. However=
, I very much like the size and visibility of the Dynam version with its ad=
ditional 10" of wingspan.

Either way, you will enjoy flying the Waco.

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion be=
low:
http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n5.nabble.com/Dynam-WACO-tp2964p4346.html
To unsubscribe from Dynam WACO, click here<http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n=
5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=3Dunsubscribe_by_code&node=3 D29=
64&code=3Dcm9uLm1lcmtsZUB0cmltZWR4LmNvbXwyOTY0fC0x NjcxNzM4Nzcz>.
NAML<http://motion-rc-forum.1075610.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?=
macro=3Dmacro_viewer&id=3Dinstant_html%21nabble%3A email.naml&base=3Dnabble.=
naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nab=
ble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=3D notify_subscribers%21nabb=
le%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_ins

**Rocketeer** · Sep 29, 2014, 07:05 PM

RE: Dynam WACO

Greetings Ron (IVFLYER),

Suggestion #1 - Take the rigging line supplied with the Waco and toss it in the can.
Suggestion #2 - Go to Wal-Mart and pick up some black elastic thread. You will love working with this stuff. Because it's elastic, your knots will almost tighten themselves and when you make your connections, by stretching the thread a bit then knotting it, it will pull back and give you a really nice mildly taught line. Just beautiful!!

In my humble opinion, on the Roc Hobby Waco, the rigging is a must and really worth the few extra moments required for its installation. And as already mentioned, the elastic thread makes a snap.

Comparing the two Wacos' I think the Roc Hobby version it extremely well engineered for fit and finish.
The Dynam is also good but not quite as solid and (again in my opinion only) a slight step down in quality. This is negated by its size advantage.

I highly recommend that you check out the mod for the landing gear covers created by Grossman56. I believe it is under "All Us Newbie Pilots, Let's Share" page 4. It is magnificant, and an excellent solution to an on-going issue of keeping the covers attached, especially on landings.

Hope this helps, if not shout back.

Clear Skies

Bill L.
in Okla.

Announcement

Dynam WACO

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment