P-38 - The Ultimate EPO Lightning

You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What New FlightlineRC or FreeWing Model would you like to see come next!

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xviper
    replied
    I could never tell the difference between an F5, T-38 or F-20, except maybe one of them having 2 seats. I had the FW F-5 and for me, it was a horrible plane to fly. It was twitchy and was like trying to control a jitter bug. Mine jitter bugged it's way into a lake a few years ago. Yesterday, a friend brought his F-5 to re-maiden after some extensive repairs from previous crashes (due to control difficulties) and once again, it was all over the sky. When he lowered the gear, it almost crashed. Oh, and he had a gyro in it. Landed it with great difficulty and broke more stuff. IMO, the F-5 was a failure, so if a T-38 would have similar flight characteristics, well .................................................. ....

    Leave a comment:


  • Cws
    replied
    C 38 when transporting parts in the luggage pod.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	T-38s-w-59-crew-to-NASA-Ames-Grand-Canyon-3-94-1024x661.jpg
Views:	520
Size:	138.5 KB
ID:	268582

    T-38

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by EA-6B Geek View Post
    80 or 90mm Cougar please! Click image for larger version  Name:	51850EF9-B31D-4A57-8A95-3C4557DB0F0D.jpeg Views:	49 Size:	106.2 KB ID:	268036
    LOVE the two seater! I vote for this as well. I even bought a plastic kit as reference.

    I used to instruct on NAS Whidbey when the prowler was there!

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by Alpha View Post
    DirtyDee is saving my life by sparing me from having to make these in mass pro!
    Amen 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
    Some incredible 3D parts DD!

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Alpha and Freewing have been knocking it out of the park!

    I know they could do an incredible twin 70mm Canberra too!

    I think both canopy types as an option would really increase sales!

    It is a very clean airplane and would easily be Freewings fastest twin 70mm!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alpha
    replied
    DirtyDee is saving my life by sparing me from having to make these in mass pro!

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Dirty Dee View Post

    do you have a 3dprinter?

    I'm designing a 3d printed T-2A for a 90. Might have it ready before the end of the year assuming no hiccups.
    Really, wow. that is awesome and no, I don't have a 3D printer as of yet, maybe one day I will pick one up, let me see pics when your done with yours.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty Dee
    replied
    Originally posted by DCORSAIR View Post
    I would like a 90mm T-2 Buckeye done up in the T-45 colors....
    do you have a 3dprinter?

    I'm designing a 3d printed T-2A for a 90. Might have it ready before the end of the year assuming no hiccups.

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    I would like a 90mm T-2 Buckeye done up in the T-45 colors....

    Leave a comment:


  • Cws
    replied
    I still would like to have an F100 from freewing, 80 mm would be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Valkpilot
    replied
    Originally posted by F106DeltaDart View Post
    Well with the release of the MiG-29, we can cross one 29 off the list. We’re about due for a multi engine Flightline bird, so hoping that a 2400mm Superfortress will be on the lineup next!
    Rather have a "Mossie" or it's little brother the Hornet. Or how about some TOTALLY NEW 70, 64, or even 50 mm jets for those of us who don't have the wide open spaces

    Leave a comment:


  • F106DeltaDart
    replied
    Well with the release of the MiG-29, we can cross one 29 off the list. We’re about due for a multi engine Flightline bird, so hoping that a 2400mm Superfortress will be on the lineup next!

    Leave a comment:


  • wolpertinger
    replied
    Originally posted by EA-6B Geek View Post
    80 or 90mm Cougar please! Click image for larger version  Name:	51850EF9-B31D-4A57-8A95-3C4557DB0F0D.jpeg Views:	0 Size:	106.2 KB ID:	268036
    Yes, yes, yes...... pretty please..... Click image for larger version

Name:	happy-exicted-please.gif
Views:	679
Size:	761.7 KB
ID:	268038

    Leave a comment:


  • EA-6B Geek
    replied
    80 or 90mm Cougar please! Click image for larger version

Name:	51850EF9-B31D-4A57-8A95-3C4557DB0F0D.jpeg
Views:	750
Size:	106.2 KB
ID:	268036

    Leave a comment:


  • Cws
    replied
    I could also go for a large Panther, or Cougar.

    Leave a comment:


  • highrunner
    replied
    I would love to see a large panther

    Leave a comment:


  • CF-105
    replied
    Yeah the gear are always the deal breaker for ARF manufacturers. Even though they could also be used in an F3F biplanes and at least one of the Grumman amphibians. And with some tweaking perhaps in other amphibs like the PBY-5, CL-215/415, Albatross, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    landing gear maybe troublesome!!!! 4 the wildcat.... i do like f4f f6f,,,, had couple dynam hellcats.... great plane with 650 kv... but u just dont see many zeros .. its still zero 4 me 1600 of course.. then james and patrick can have a real pacific shootout..... f4u will still win of course

    Leave a comment:


  • CF-105
    replied
    I'm not much into foam, but I'd be all over a Wildcat, say 1600mm or bigger. With working retracts of course. There are certain planes that I don't care what they're made of, as long as they're done right. The F4F tops that list.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X