You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What New FlightlineRC or FreeWing Model would you like to see come next!

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AirHead
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J2F Duck 3.jpg
Views:	632
Size:	54.1 KB
ID:	269551Click image for larger version

Name:	J2F Duck.jpg
Views:	618
Size:	263.6 KB
ID:	269552


    Click image for larger version

Name:	Boeing B17 Flying Fortress.jpg
Views:	651
Size:	91.2 KB
ID:	269553Click image for larger version

Name:	Boeing B17.jpg
Views:	710
Size:	99.6 KB
ID:	269550
    One of these please......

    Leave a comment:


  • CF-105
    replied
    Now that Motion has a German "Arrow" (DO-335 Pfeil), they need the Canadian one: Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Beetlemankurt
    replied
    Originally posted by Cws View Post
    A 1500 or 1600 Flight line zero or FW 190 would be an excellent addition to the flight line squadron.
    please please please to a 1.6m FW190 or P40.........you know you want to Alpha!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cws
    replied
    A 1500 or 1600 Flight line zero or FW 190 would be an excellent addition to the flight line squadron.

    Leave a comment:


  • axerhand1976
    replied
    we have too many allied planes. we need a large zero!!! or something way different like a westland wyvern

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    if it was a p51 a redtail always looks good,,, the squark team would no the model ...... i dont but my corsair still has an itchy trigger finger ... 1600 zero... its has good support!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Grossman56 , I'm with you on this one. A detailed 1600mm P-51 B with the Malcolm Hood would be truly great. I get the 'numbers thing' with the "D" but Wow, wouldn't it be wonderful. A B-17G in 2000mm = off the charts cool. A 1600mm Zeke would be nice or either a 1600mm FW Ta-152 or FW 190D works for me, too. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • ICM
    replied
    I'm with you Aros - a decked out, up to date P-51D1600 in a real warbird scheme! To quote my grandmother, "From your lips to God's ear."

    Leave a comment:


  • Aros
    replied
    D's will always outsell B's or C's but the latter have their fanbase too. My vote is for a 1600mm+ D with all the bells and whistles. If not that, then please let it be either a 2000mm+ B-17 or B-25 or 1600mm+ BF-109.

    Leave a comment:


  • ICM
    replied
    I'm betting its a P-51, likely a D, maybe a B variant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Grossman56
    replied
    Fella's PLEASE!
    It's gotta be a P-51B/C and like the Corsair, you can get either a standard or Malcom hood.
    One of the colors schemes will be Major James Howard CMH!
    Alpha all but said it when he stated that if you wanted a sure fire selling airplane it's got to be either a Mustang or a Piper Cub, I'm betting a Mustang!!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_25735.jpg
Views:	331
Size:	283.6 KB
ID:	268871 may she rest in pieces

    Grossman56

    Leave a comment:


  • deadbug
    replied
    I would LOVE a really nice scale EPO T-38. I've converted a Freewing F-5 to a T-38 (see below). Flies real stable, with and without a gyro; but lands hot/heavy. Use 5200 and 6200/6250 6S with an FMS 80mm 2100 Platinum Pro V2 EDF/100amp Eflite ESC.
    Got rid of that annoying yaw to the right with gear extension by cutting a NLG access opening and gluing the gear door shut. BTW, making that cockpit and fabricating the canopies was the worst part.
    BUT the FW F-5 is a very dated platform and a dedicated remake to a scale T-38 would be fantastic.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	T-38.JPG Views:	0 Size:	173.7 KB ID:	268791

    Leave a comment:


  • Hoomi
    replied
    There are minor differences between the T-38 and the F-5, primarily in the cockpit configuration. The F-5 typically has a single-seat cockpit, while the T-38 is a dual-seater. The easiest way to spot the F-20 from either the T-38 or the F-5, is that the Tigershark has a single, larger engine exhaust nozzle, as opposed to the dual exhausts of the other two.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	e4e5590203919d46b042bfdccc848d11.jpg
Views:	475
Size:	50.0 KB
ID:	268756

    OV-1.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Phantom
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    I could never tell the difference between an F5, T-38 or F-20, except maybe one of them having 2 seats. I had the FW F-5 and for me, it was a horrible plane to fly. It was twitchy and was like trying to control a jitter bug. Mine jitter bugged it's way into a lake a few years ago. Yesterday, a friend brought his F-5 to re-maiden after some extensive repairs from previous crashes (due to control difficulties) and once again, it was all over the sky. When he lowered the gear, it almost crashed. Oh, and he had a gyro in it. Landed it with great difficulty and broke more stuff. IMO, the F-5 was a failure, so if a T-38 would have similar flight characteristics, well .................................................. ....
    I absolutely love my F-5, I've got 2. To me it's been a stable flyer and a very predictable landing bird.

    Leave a comment:


  • Valkpilot
    replied
    Originally posted by Cws View Post
    C 38 when transporting parts in the luggage pod.
    I remember an episode of :"The Six Million Dollar Man" where Steve Austin used the Thunderbirds as a cover to help smuggle out a prince (I think) after his father had an "accident" and the head of the military took over the country. The smuggled the kid out in a specially modified T-38 nose.

    Leave a comment:


  • EA-6B Geek
    replied
    Originally posted by wvrailfan View Post
    I'm still holding out for an O-2/Cessna 336 in the 1400-1500mm range. Lots of options for paint schemes so it would be a great candidate for a base gray or white, with decals optional.

    I'm loving my T-33, so some other early cold war jets would be neat, perhaps an F-3D Skyknight.

    I like the twin 70mm Canberra and 80 or 90mm T-38 suggestions also.

    JB
    Skyknight yes!

    Leave a comment:


  • wvrailfan
    replied
    I'm still holding out for an O-2/Cessna 336 in the 1400-1500mm range. Lots of options for paint schemes so it would be a great candidate for a base gray or white, with decals optional.

    I'm loving my T-33, so some other early cold war jets would be neat, perhaps an F-3D Skyknight.

    I like the twin 70mm Canberra and 80 or 90mm T-38 suggestions also.

    JB

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    I could never tell the difference between an F5, T-38 or F-20, except maybe one of them having 2 seats. I had the FW F-5 and for me, it was a horrible plane to fly. It was twitchy and was like trying to control a jitter bug. Mine jitter bugged it's way into a lake a few years ago. Yesterday, a friend brought his F-5 to re-maiden after some extensive repairs from previous crashes (due to control difficulties) and once again, it was all over the sky. When he lowered the gear, it almost crashed. Oh, and he had a gyro in it. Landed it with great difficulty and broke more stuff. IMO, the F-5 was a failure, so if a T-38 would have similar flight characteristics, well .................................................. ....
    It’s a fantastic flying little jet! The red and white scheme just pops, I love it. It can really move on the new FW 80mm IR and a Roaring Top 70c 4400 too!

    Would love to see a twin 70mm though for sure. I’d pick the T-38




    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    I could never tell the difference between an F5, T-38 or F-20, except maybe one of them having 2 seats. I had the FW F-5 and for me, it was a horrible plane to fly. It was twitchy and was like trying to control a jitter bug. Mine jitter bugged it's way into a lake a few years ago. Yesterday, a friend brought his F-5 to re-maiden after some extensive repairs from previous crashes (due to control difficulties) and once again, it was all over the sky. When he lowered the gear, it almost crashed. Oh, and he had a gyro in it. Landed it with great difficulty and broke more stuff. IMO, the F-5 was a failure, so if a T-38 would have similar flight characteristics, well .................................................. ....
    Bigger would be better as far as the T-38 goes there are several scratch builds out there that fly extremely well.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X