You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Freewing Su-35 Twin 70mm 12 blade

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • radfordc
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewF View Post
    I’m deciding between this, the free wing F-14, or the E-flite Su-30.
    Asking about the Su-30 in the Su-35 thread confuses folks. I fly an Su-30 and it's a dog in stock condition out of the box. I've mod'ed mine so that it flys very nice. It's a heavy beast....mine is 11 lbs now!.

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewF View Post
    Except weight isn’t the only factor.
    YOU asked if there are any "major differences".

    Weight IS the major difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    When one weighs 2600g and the other two are well over 4000g (4200g - 4400g) and you’re talking performance, yeah, weight is pretty much the only factor. The SU-30 and F-14 both fly HEAVY, no two ways about it. The SU-35 will fly rings around the other two. It’s also the cheapest. Don’t like the foam? Well, it’s light for a reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewF
    replied
    Originally posted by kallend View Post

    Take a look at the weights and draw your own conclusions.
    Except weight isn’t the only factor.

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewF View Post
    fair enough lol. How about the performance between them? Are there any major differences?
    Take a look at the weights and draw your own conclusions.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewF
    replied
    Originally posted by Airguardian View Post
    If you crash them all will turn into pieces.
    Being EPS means you get a lighter frame that performs much better.

    Plus, the thrust vectoring (and the stock Su-35 now ships with a better powerplant apparently).
    fair enough lol. How about the performance between them? Are there any major differences?

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    If you crash them all will turn into pieces.
    Being EPS means you get a lighter frame that performs much better.

    Plus, the thrust vectoring (and the stock Su-35 now ships with a better powerplant apparently).

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewF
    replied
    Hey guys, I’m looking at getting a new EDF war bird and I’m deciding between this, the free wing F-14, or the E-flite Su-30. Does anyone have any recommendations on why one is better than the other? This one is cool because of thrust vectoring, but is made from EPS foam which slightly concerns me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Those square loops came out tidy!



    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Awesome, this is great news!

    Leave a comment:


  • haljennings
    replied
    I called Motion and they said the new version came with twin 100 amp esc's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    That's going to be a great upgrade for this model!

    Leave a comment:


  • aamz13
    replied
    Originally posted by haljennings View Post
    Has anybody tried the new high speed version?
    I am wrapping up my F-22 this week . the Outgoing SU-35 or the mirage 2000 will be next.
    I am tempted to go for the new inrunners and use the 80A HOBBYWING ESC's I have. I do not remember if the outgoing version has 80A ESCs or 65 as the sight says.
    Not I feel the new high performance model justifies the price update in the SU. I got mine in April did not get a chance to put it together yet. I like the overall offering of the new HP Version

    Leave a comment:


  • haljennings
    replied
    Has anybody tried the new high speed version?

    Leave a comment:


  • paulrkytek
    replied
    Originally posted by aamz13 View Post

    Is that nose wheel strut from a Freewing F -22 ?
    no, its from Hobbyking, as are the mains struts( 60 to 90 size with adjusted spring strength). I replaced the normal brace and slider on the nose wheel with 8mmsq hollow cf burried in the fuselage acting as a body reinforcement and backstop to the nose leg when the gear is down along with a ply slotted nose guide hidden. by the gear doors which are now glued in. There are also backstops to the mains in ply wedges. The nose gear gives me a nice slightly upward angle of attack for take off.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by aamz13 View Post

    Is that nose wheel strut from a Freewing F -22 ?
    Originally posted by TangoVector View Post
    All that is left now is the nose-gear changed to Avanti version. Not scale but I prefer good grass capability since the grass is a little tall at the club sometimes.

    Leave a comment:


  • aamz13
    replied
    Originally posted by paulrkytek View Post

    I have the same fans and servos and they both work fine. I fly off grass and have slightly bigger mains wheels but with upgraded oleos. Good luck with fitting the big wheel without a bit of re sculpturing or catching the doors or door servos on opening. I gave up on the doors and added small ventrals and landing lights to hide the line of the hole left.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210611_000246_2CS[1].jpg
Views:	654
Size:	78.4 KB
ID:	315607Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210611_000259_3CS[1].jpg
Views:	666
Size:	46.2 KB
ID:	315608

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SU35 landing gear view.jpg
Views:	700
Size:	235.6 KB
ID:	315606
    Is that nose wheel strut from a Freewing F -22 ?

    Leave a comment:


  • paulrkytek
    replied
    Originally posted by TangoVector View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	2CE57408-C790-4379-9CC4-02C3E53E35D6.jpeg
Views:	881
Size:	79.3 KB
ID:	315600 It ain’t gonna be pretty…
    I have the same fans and servos and they both work fine. I fly off grass and have slightly bigger mains wheels but with upgraded oleos. Good luck with fitting the big wheel without a bit of re sculpturing or catching the doors or door servos on opening. I gave up on the doors and added small ventrals and landing lights to hide the line of the hole left.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210611_000246_2CS[1].jpg
Views:	654
Size:	78.4 KB
ID:	315607Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210611_000259_3CS[1].jpg
Views:	666
Size:	46.2 KB
ID:	315608

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SU35 landing gear view.jpg
Views:	700
Size:	235.6 KB
ID:	315606

    Leave a comment:


  • TangoVector
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	2CE57408-C790-4379-9CC4-02C3E53E35D6.jpeg
Views:	881
Size:	79.3 KB
ID:	315600 It ain’t gonna be pretty…

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Have a few of those DMC809 but never got to try them in flight yet... they should be quite an improvement over the stock ones! ;)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X