Irvine RC Tank Club

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DavidN
    replied
    Our Irvine RC Tank Club is invited to be part of the City of Stanton's Teen Night Out Event this Friday. Our tank battle will be one of the programs of their games and activities for teens. If you have teens from 12 to 15 years old, you can sign up at the below website. It is from 6:30PM to 9:00 PM. This is our first time battling in the evening. It will be different. Can't wait to see how this will turn out.





    Click image for larger version

Name:	ANNOUNCEMENT.jpg
Views:	1187
Size:	178.4 KB
ID:	384891

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3370.jpg
Views:	883
Size:	103.1 KB
ID:	384734Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3372.jpg
Views:	347
Size:	93.1 KB
ID:	384735Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3369.jpg
Views:	306
Size:	92.0 KB
ID:	384736

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    I bought this used dollhouse for $20. It is now our Irvine RC Tank Club's first plastic house for our battlefield. Slowly we will replace those cardboard houses​, hehe!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	357354478_6378739668874166_2316297862506064869_n.jpg
Views:	887
Size:	121.0 KB
ID:	384731

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3371.jpg
Views:	333
Size:	99.2 KB
ID:	384732

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    It is confirmed....We are invited to the Spirit of '45 event this Sunday. Looking forward to be there. Anyone would like to come with us, please let me know your full name so I can add you into our group. You won't be charge with admission fee. Please bring tanks that are late in the war. They give us space for 2 EZ Ups and a space 30x60 for our battlefield. It will be on concrete surface.


    surface. Click image for larger version

Name:	363396925_24455404504059237_7001693091567907116_n.jpg
Views:	368
Size:	78.0 KB
ID:	383805Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-08-07 165127.jpg
Views:	373
Size:	140.1 KB
ID:	383806Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-08-07 165159.jpg
Views:	370
Size:	120.2 KB
ID:	383807

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubicon99
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS
    That's why I like the area we use in San Diego; dirt and sand, interesting terrain with dips and berms...

    SD is by far the best tank driving/fighting action in Ca. Definitely worth the drive down. The soil is nearly for RC tanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    That's why I like the area we use in San Diego; dirt and sand, interesting terrain with dips and berms...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tang - RC.Senshado
    replied
    Not fun if a newbies tank de-tracks or gets stuck constantly. We're just talking about making the game fun here.

    Leave a comment:


  • cmdrcody
    replied
    Originally posted by Tang - RC.Senshado

    The people and the battles never get dull! But that terrain was giving us some challenges. We need to find areas with just solid packed dirt or concrete.
    Well, there goes the realism of the battlefield. Deal with it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tang - RC.Senshado
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS
    Love the dirt field!
    The people and the battles never get dull! But that terrain was giving us some challenges. We need to find areas with just solid packed dirt or concrete.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    Love the dirt field!

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8443.jpg
Views:	425
Size:	174.3 KB
ID:	383550Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8435.jpg
Views:	443
Size:	264.2 KB
ID:	383551Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8442.jpg
Views:	457
Size:	246.1 KB
ID:	383552Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8433.jpg
Views:	457
Size:	252.3 KB
ID:	383553

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8423.jpg
Views:	407
Size:	224.5 KB
ID:	383545Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8422.jpg
Views:	403
Size:	241.6 KB
ID:	383546Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8426.jpg
Views:	416
Size:	258.5 KB
ID:	383547Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8430.jpg
Views:	405
Size:	282.7 KB
ID:	383548

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8418.jpg
Views:	423
Size:	198.9 KB
ID:	383540Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8421.jpg
Views:	420
Size:	198.1 KB
ID:	383541Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8417.jpg
Views:	397
Size:	244.8 KB
ID:	383542Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8419.jpg
Views:	437
Size:	196.4 KB
ID:	383543

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8411.jpg
Views:	431
Size:	210.6 KB
ID:	383535Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8410.jpg
Views:	436
Size:	221.0 KB
ID:	383536Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8412.jpg
Views:	390
Size:	265.8 KB
ID:	383537Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8403.jpg
Views:	452
Size:	269.5 KB
ID:	383538

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    More pics from the battlefield... Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8394.jpg
Views:	432
Size:	237.1 KB
ID:	383530Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8401.jpg
Views:	394
Size:	251.3 KB
ID:	383531Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8382.jpg
Views:	428
Size:	265.3 KB
ID:	383532Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8383.jpg
Views:	441
Size:	293.3 KB
ID:	383533

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7780.jpg
Views:	481
Size:	288.0 KB
ID:	383462Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7786.jpg
Views:	462
Size:	260.7 KB
ID:	383463Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7774.jpg
Views:	473
Size:	214.1 KB
ID:	383464Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7795.jpg
Views:	430
Size:	228.1 KB
ID:	383465

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7754.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	294.1 KB
ID:	383457Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7757.jpg
Views:	475
Size:	311.0 KB
ID:	383458Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7764.jpg
Views:	448
Size:	295.0 KB
ID:	383459Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7756.jpg
Views:	470
Size:	193.8 KB
ID:	383460

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Our event st Stanton Central Park today.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7737.jpg
Views:	269
Size:	224.0 KB
ID:	383452Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7742.jpg
Views:	247
Size:	323.0 KB
ID:	383453Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7748.jpg
Views:	260
Size:	245.4 KB
ID:	383454Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7750.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	372.4 KB
ID:	383455

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalBobS
    replied
    Originally posted by DavidN

    Bob, it seems like you prefer the HL 7.1 board over the TK26?
    Hi. With over two dozen tanks in my stable, I need to be consistent with the control systems. The 7.0/7.1's have a lot features I like; the no-spin steering option is high on the list. Adjustable precise steering is good, turning on and off airsoft is another. Smoke on/off of course. Simple volume control. The on/off wifi circuit can be used for any 6V application. My modern tanks have beacons on that circuit. Some other tanks have auxiliary functions on that channel. There are a lot of lighting circuits - muzzle flash, firing alert, brake and tail lights among others. Really the only negatives are the lack of a progressive damage from hits, and limited sound options. Regarding the latter, in outdoor battles one tank sounds like another from a distance. About 2/3 of my tanks only need the 7.0's. The 7.1s I install in tanks that have or I'm adding servo recoil or elevation.

    I have three Mato tanks all of which require servo elevation and recoil. My Vandramodel conversions also use servos.

    I tried a TK26 and the coarse steering control was off-putting. Also, I never did find out how to bind more than one tank to a transmitter. For Heng Longs it's dirt simple. I did love their sound options though.

    I also tried a Clark TK50. After a few weeks it began to malfunction and after hearing the frustrations others have had with them, I decided not to pursue that course. I'm sure they can work well, but if a HL board breaks down, I'm not out $200 plus.

    Just a personal preference.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidN
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalBobS

    I've installed two of these cable sets, on a Pershing and a Sherman. They work fine! I did change the three-wire plug to work with a 7.1 board so I could activate servo operated barrel recoil mechanisms. If others think a 7.1 version is desirable, let us know.
    Bob, it seems like you prefer the HL 7.1 board over the TK26?

    Leave a comment:

Working...