Originally posted by Twowingtj
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New proposed FAA rule requiring remote identification for SUAVs over .55 lbs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MikeT View Post
Unfortunately terrorists don't play by the rules or follow them.
Guys, What many of you also don't realize, is that much of the push for remote ID was driven by terrorism concerns by the TSA.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RRHandy View Post
I have said it before, small inexpensive transponder, $5.00 x 81 = $405.00 for me Now, let alone future bought planes with it in it and you think that the government don't have their hand out.
Mike\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeT View Post
Theses are supposed to be. Movable from plane to plane.
Mike
Comment
-
I Feel betrayed by the AMA As some of you have stated they are money hungry also. They are hoping this will increase their membership ,and more new clubs for them. I do not see the need for this over reach in regulations in states like Wyo. S.D. N.D. Mt. There is nothing to blow up or attack, Most of these small town Airports in these states may only have two Planes land in days some times weeks The Reg. Should be left up to each individual Sate Take the State of Wyo. There are more oil field, natural gas fields and coal mine vehicles licensed in the state then there are People I see no reason for the larger Class G Airspace States have to put up with such Stupidity. The greatest lie ever told is " we are from the gov. and we are here to help What a joke. Money talks BS walks. Many of the Fliers in Wyo. Montana and SD do not belong to the AMA nor do they ever plan to be. So I hope they leave us alone out here in Gods Country. So do we just shut up and do as told? I feel like a sheep being lead to slaughter. To many just say OH well there is nothing we can do about it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Man View PostI Feel betrayed by the AMA As some of you have stated they are money hungry also. They are hoping this will increase their membership ,and more new clubs for them. I do not see the need for this over reach in regulations in states like Wyo. S.D. N.D. Mt. There is nothing to blow up or attack, Most of these small town Airports in these states may only have two Planes land in days some times weeks The Reg. Should be left up to each individual Sate Take the State of Wyo. There are more oil field, natural gas fields and coal mine vehicles licensed in the state then there are People I see no reason for the larger Class G Airspace States have to put up with such Stupidity. The greatest lie ever told is " we are from the gov. and we are here to help What a joke. Money talks BS walks. Many of the Fliers in Wyo. Montana and SD do not belong to the AMA nor do they ever plan to be. So I hope they leave us alone out here in Gods Country. So do we just shut up and do as told? I feel like a sheep being lead to slaughter. To many just say OH well there is nothing we can do about itHugh "Wildman" Wiedman
Hangar: FL/FW: Mig 29 "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet, F16 Wild Weasel, F4 Phantom & Blue Angel, 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, Olive B-24, Stinger 90, Red Avanti. Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 60" Extra 300 V2, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, MXS Green, & Demonstrator. FMS-1700mm P-51, Red Bull Corsair. E-Flite-70mm twin SU-30, Beast Bi-Plane 60", P2 Bi-Plane, P-51.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Man View PostI Feel betrayed by the AMA A..... I do not see the need for this over reach in regulations in states like Wyo. S.D. N.D. Mt. ....
As far as the rest of your comment about overreach - yeah, I do feel like we get caught up in overreach and irrational policy. The way regulations are settled is very political, and not rational engineering design. It turns into a political mess with stupid results sometimes. Frustrating.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gringotuerto View Post
AMA has been doing a good job
But guess who does...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeT View Post
Comment
-
Shot Chad at the AMA a email on this and his response was quick and pointed out that apparently this "committee" is focused on the commercial aspects and the AMA ( Chad and Rich) are still involved in the other subcommittees ( that meet weekly) on low altitude manned aircraft and UAS operations. I've found it's best to go to the source rather than jump to conclusions.
Mike\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I will not be complying with this FAA “rule” (only elected officials can write laws, the FAA is an unelected association). I absolutely will not be adding a bulky “remote ID thing” to an aircraft that is under 1 meter in wingspan and ABSOLUTELY will not add anything to my ultra micros to comply with a fake law.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JoeM723 View PostI will not be complying with this FAA “rule” (only elected officials can write laws, the FAA is an unelected association). I absolutely will not be adding a bulky “remote ID thing” to an aircraft that is under 1 meter in wingspan and ABSOLUTELY will not add anything to my ultra micros to comply with a fake law.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment