You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's next from Motion RC?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rifleman_btx
    replied
    Yes please!

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Coconut AWSOME analogy. Just do a Hellcat while they are at it also to finish out the Grumman line in 1600

    Leave a comment:


  • Coconut
    replied
    Since there is a Flightline 1600mm Spitfire to protect lil brother Flightline 1200mm Spitfire. How about a 1600mm Flightline Bearcat to protect lil brother Flightline 1200mm Bearcat?

    Leave a comment:


  • T-CAT
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • rifleman_btx
    replied
    Ah! Someone is always one step ahead of me. Lol

    Leave a comment:


  • T-CAT
    replied
    Originally posted by rifleman_btx View Post
    I was thinking of a suggestion for the next plane. But thought of something that could benefit the longevity of the planes around the hatch, would it be possible to have a plastic shell around the area of the foam down the lenght where the hatch and and fuselage meet? The reason I asks is, first it would reduce the flex of the hatch (less cracks in the finish of the hatch over time) and second add rigidity to the hatch sections of the fuselage. If you brought the plastic up about a half inch up the sides of the hatch and down the outsides of the hatch space, I feel like that area of wear would be reduced significantly. Anyway just a thought.
    This is basically what E-Flite has done on two of their new planes, the FW 190 and the F-16 80mm EDF jet. I like the idea and implementation because I’m picky and I like to keep my planes looking nice even after hundreds of flights.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    RM, Acknowledged and Agreed. I have used epoxy (F-4) between the hatch and fuselage. Kind of like we did in the olden days where we used silicone in the wing saddle to better match the wing to the fuselage. The gap on some of these models is 'not attractive' to say the least. Great suggestion, Bro. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • rifleman_btx
    replied
    I was thinking of a suggestion for the next plane. But thought of something that could benefit the longevity of the planes around the hatch, would it be possible to have a plastic shell around the area of the foam down the lenght where the hatch and and fuselage meet? The reason I asks is, first it would reduce the flex of the hatch (less cracks in the finish of the hatch over time) and second add rigidity to the hatch sections of the fuselage. If you brought the plastic up about a half inch up the sides of the hatch and down the outsides of the hatch space, I feel like that area of wear would be reduced significantly. Anyway just a thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • Biff767
    replied
    AVENGER Please!

    Leave a comment:


  • CF-105
    replied
    Would love an Avenger! Preferably balsa tho, I'd need two... one in military colours, and another I'd redo in the markings of one of the forestry planes I worked beside about 30 years ago (I was just a lowly Cessna pilot).

    Leave a comment:


  • Gringotuerto
    replied
    Originally posted by SanExup View Post
    ... youtube enthusiasts aren't the NTSB,....
    I sometimes type youtube comments, but if I ever run across a video on my actual field of expertise, I take one glace at the comment section and read all the idiocy and just think...."nope." No way am I going to engage and type a comment. It's much easier to summarize my impression when I don't actually understand the underlying details.

    Anyway, whatever the reason, the end result is that youtube comment sections show a negative correlation between confidence and competence.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    As I watched that news clip, I was thinking, "Heads are going to go flying everywhere". He just missed a few by mere feet.

    Leave a comment:


  • SanExup
    replied
    Or it's just the good part, a positive outcome of that story. I agree that he nailed the water landing part. After seeing more footage and different angles, he was pretty close to people in the water. I doubt he had a life vest, so that was probably a component of his decision. He didn't cartwheel, but he could have. And then I also saw that someone presented footage of him trailing smoke at altitude with other airfields nearby. But youtube enthusiasts aren't the NTSB, I think we have snippets of the whole story. The thing I have always appreciated about aviation and incident evaluation, is that the outcome, positive or negative, doesn't negate all of the details and possibilities when analyzing a crash. Some people do everything right and die, some people do everything wrong and live. The water landing itself looked text book to me but he didn't get shot down. And I'm not part of the accident investigation. Just saying. I'm impressed. And I think the story just started really when he hit the water.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Originally posted by TangoVector View Post

    Yeah, let's land near this populated beach with people in the water, not a further 100m out where the risk of hitting anyone is zero. It's the same as landing on highways, bad judgement. If you're flying a warbird you have signed up for some risk, bathing at a beach not so much.
    He nailed it. End of story.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • TangoVector
    replied
    Originally posted by SanExup View Post
    It was impressive! Bad enough you have to do a water landing. But also to contend with a populated beach.
    Yeah, let's land near this populated beach with people in the water, not a further 100m out where the risk of hitting anyone is zero. It's the same as landing on highways, bad judgement. If you're flying a warbird you have signed up for some risk, bathing at a beach not so much.

    Leave a comment:


  • SanExup
    replied
    It was impressive! Bad enough you have to do a water landing. But also to contend with a populated beach.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wild Man
    replied
    Originally posted by 406PIlot View Post

    You mean as it water landed?? It was pretty crazy to see the video of it.. the pilot was good!
    I just watch the landing in the water on the news tonight. WOW he made a great emergency landing

    Leave a comment:


  • 406PIlot
    replied
    Originally posted by dahawk View Post
    Well the full scale flys good slow as shown at the Cocoa Beach air show.
    You mean as it water landed?? It was pretty crazy to see the video of it.. the pilot was good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Gringotuerto
    replied
    Originally posted by Gilatrout View Post
    An avenger is on my must have.
    The real one has a reputation of being a horrible flyer. It was nicknamed the "Turkey", and here is an example article of a modern pilot's impression of "Turkey Wrestling". Sounds harrowing.

    http://warbirdsnews.com/warbirds-new...m-avenger.html

    Of course there is no reason an electric foam model would have these same characteristics. I agree it would be a great model. Lots of opportunity to add things.

    Leave a comment:


  • dahawk
    replied
    Well the full scale flys good slow as shown at the Cocoa Beach air show.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X