mr.frankenjet frankenjet
Grossman56
f4u ausie
Thanks for the nice wishes, guys, that's sweet. Rest assured though, I'm built into the walls so I ain't going anywhere! We've been interviewing for several weeks for several roles to add to our global team, not dilute it. Onward and upward :b787:
What's next from Motion RC?
Collapse
X
-
Alpha has done so much to raise the bar,best planes in the industry, say it aint so...........................Leave a comment:
-
-
With this thread now hitting it's 4000th post as of this one, I guess it may not be in vogue much longer on this forum due to the most recent Motion job postings I happened to see.Product Manager - Aircraft Productshttps://motionrc.zohorecruit.com/rec...rce=CareerSiteProduct Manager - Surface Productshttps://motionrc.zohorecruit.com/rec...rce=CareerSite
It by all appearances may be we are going to lose our favorite Alpha as the single point new product manager for which we have all for years enjoyed his poetic riddles regarding all the fantastic releases he has overseen.
I personally hope this is not the case and that it is a matter that he is spreading the wealth of responsibolity about and is rising to even a higher calling in the Motion organization.
My best wishes for Alpha and with best regards,Leave a comment:
-
BTW, the Dynam Bf-110 is still available, if you need a 110. I actually really like mine. Zero trouble ever. Large and informative discussion thread over on RCG.
What do you think of a BF-110? Quite a few years ago Dynam made one (1500mm), and you still see them around once in a while. But the difference between having a Dynam model and not having a model at all is, well, a very small difference. Flightline could do a lot better, and it would be a nice addition to the twins, P-38, Tigercat, OV-10....and I guess the A-12 (half of a B-24).
While Dynam models often need a little extra work, the distance from no model to a Dynam model is much, much further than from a Dynam Model to a FW or FMS. I have really enjoyed my Bf-110, Me-262, PBY, B-26 and Cessna 310 and all have been nearly trouble free.
The color scheme choices that a Dynam makes for their warbirds usually inspire me to do a repaint....:)
Getting back to the topic, the next twin warbird that I desire the most is an A-26! Seems to be popular as a next warbird in these sort of threads.
I would rather see FW fill in some important missing subjects like the A-26 before duplicating a warbird available from another source.Leave a comment:
-
I think an A26 invader would be a winner, I have never seen one offered to us in foam. About 1500 mm will be just right.Leave a comment:
-
S2,+1...From your post to Alpha's drafting table. Yes, please and the livery wouldn't matter, even a gray version, though Berlin Express would be perfect. Best, LBLeave a comment:
-
-
Spitfire, I demand
For my Mustang,
850 mm
With a Flightline demeanor.Leave a comment:
-
OK, Here's my lovely poem, containing a subtle hint at the plane I would like to see in 1600mm:
Roses are red
Violets are blue
The 20mm cannon on a Bf-109 can destroy anything, including both rhyme and meter.
Leave a comment:
-
Its might will impress
The roar will deafen
Showing off with grace
Unique and special
Blue canvas pierced
By the queen of Heavens
Please bring us all
a big Su-57!


Leave a comment:
-
-
Poem?
This much is true
And you know it too
That you
Need to
Do a Voodoo!
(not quitting my day job!)Leave a comment:
-
I miss the old Viet Nam era, "Iron Bird" known as the Douglas A1 Skyraider. There have been a handful of RC models produced, long out of production. Perhaps too old, too slow, too ugly and irrelevant at this point. I still fly the old Durafly 1100mm that I have saved from destruction. Switched it to a 4S system and it really moves out. A 1200mm or 1400mm properly built and set up would look good out there....
Leave a comment:
-
It's about time 4 a poem. Mmmm. AsLong As it's a ZzzEeroo. And has a meatball. James was just practiceing. 4 a 1600. Zero
Leave a comment:
-
Oh sorry, I was just making a dumb joke....Flightline has made several twins and then also B-24, so I thought half of a B-24 should count as another twin, and should be called an A-12 :stuck_out_tongue_cl. But I like both those posted by Valkpilot - especially that second one could make for very efficient use of a shipping container, lol. By the way, the wikipedia article on the A-12 is interesting, I didn't realize it saw significant operation before being replaced by SR-71. It was not just a one-off prototype on the way to the SR-71.Leave a comment:
-
Which A-12?
What do you think of a BF-110? Quite a few years ago Dynam made one (1500mm), and you still see them around once in a while. But the difference between having a Dynam model and not having a model at all is, well, a very small difference. Flightline could do a lot better, and it would be a nice addition to the twins, P-38, Tigercat, OV-10....and I guess the A-12 (half of a B-24).
This one?

Or this one?
Leave a comment:
-
Hmmm. The A-12 was the Curtiss Shike, a single engine pre-WWII aircraft.
What do you think of a BF-110? Quite a few years ago Dynam made one (1500mm), and you still see them around once in a while. But the difference between having a Dynam model and not having a model at all is, well, a very small difference. Flightline could do a lot better, and it would be a nice addition to the twins, P-38, Tigercat, OV-10....and I guess the A-12 (half of a B-24).
Did you mean the Douglas A-20 Havoc? Or?
Leave a comment:


ll mo
Leave a comment: