New Avios Mig 17 ?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xviper
    replied
    Update: FIXED! Squeezed the outer casing a bit out of round where those two side arms are. Inside, I applied a bit of epoxy steel in the two locations where there's a bit of a slot where the side arm pins poke into the sides of the casing. The Mig is hung back up in its storage location, awaiting its turn to be flown again.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    mshagg Thank you so much for the explanation. It makes sense and as it turns out, I had a 1/2 dream, 1/2 awake ponder about it overnight and the images that came to me :sleeping: was similar to what you just described. I'm going to see what can be done to hold firm the internals on the unit. As you say, it is a marvel the way it works and looks and I'd rather not replace them (with "normal" retracts), if that's even possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • mshagg
    replied
    Yes I had the same thing occur, the stepper motor in the retract unit came loose from the housing and spun itself and the wiring around until it failed. This was not that long after release and HK made it right with a new unit. You can probably repair it by fixing the motor into the housing some way. The reason it wont stop spinning is because duing normal operation the external controller stops the motor once the retract reaches the end of its travel and the current draw from the motor goes up. If it's spinning freely like that, the controller thinks all is well.

    I absolutely adore the mechanical construction of the retracts, gold standard, but the external controller for the stepper motors is a very strange configuration.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    First problem during the last flight of the 17. One main retract would not come down for the landing. Landed on 2 wheels, no damage. Did some diagnostics and it turns out that the left retract had no power. The 2 wires going into the retract cylindrical housing was severely twisted up, cause one of the wires going through the hole to strip itself clean and shorted out. I soldered the wires back together after untwisting it all, cover with heat shrink. After hooking it back up, it worked BUT after the gear completed its cycle, the internal mechanism spun inside the casing, twisting the wiring like a pretzel. I had to unplug it or it would just keep going. The other side doesn’t do this, so something inside must have come loose and the internal stuff is not held firm within the housing. It would seem this unit was “repaired” at the factory as 2 of the screws were missing from the side plates. The other good side was completely intact and the wires were not twisted up.
    HobbyKing is “out of stock” and won’t say when it’ll have any. Has anyone replaced the stock retracts with more conventional ones that can be operated directly from the RX? I guess the gear doors will have to go and all 3 would have to be replaced. It’s too bad. I like the stock gear. It’s got that one oddity in that the gear has to work through that sequencer and the power unit - only 2 wires going to each retract.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    I do remember I changed some hardware, pushrods and screws... not many but a few. I did remove the white interconnection box and ran Y's and extensions. But all the servos, retracts, retract board and sequencer are stock.


    Originally posted by Phantom

    Evan, I've been delaying putting this one together due to mods I'd have to do. Your message gives me hope. I'm gonna start on it tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • quitcherbitchen
    replied
    Originally posted by MrSmoothie
    Happy to see a thread on the Avios Mig-17 over here on HS. I'm "done" with the thread on RCG -- every second or third post is from the same jack*** (yes, I mean that) who posts his new videos flying his Mig irresponsibly (the way that is causing, and will continue to cause, all kinds of issues by the FAA for law-abiding AMA member flyers).



    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5830.JPG Views:	0 Size:	160.0 KB ID:	223581Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5831.JPG Views:	0 Size:	156.8 KB ID:	223579Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5778.JPG Views:	0 Size:	99.4 KB ID:	223578Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5774.JPG Views:	0 Size:	123.4 KB ID:	223577Click image for larger version Name:	3020 Best Image Mig 17.jpg Views:	0 Size:	33.5 KB ID:	223582Click image for larger version Name:	Untitled-11.jpg Views:	0 Size:	109.9 KB ID:	223583
    Very nice mr Smoothie. Love the scheme. Any info about that picture of the real plane? looks interesting like it is on an American base. Anyway, I totally agree with the JackSSA on the RC Groups hijacking every thread he is on and ruining it for everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phantom
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    I’m still running all stock without problems.
    Evan, I've been delaying putting this one together due to mods I'd have to do. Your message gives me hope. I'm gonna start on it tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    I’m still running all stock without problems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Porkster
    replied
    Originally posted by Vextren
    Perhaps I'm a little late to the party on this one, but I do not have experience with this bird, but from other HK product experience and testimony from some MIG17 owners I know, they said "the model itself is good. But the electronics are junk, throw them out and grab a set of freewing electronics and Frankenstein them in." Perhaps they have improved the electronics on the newer runs of the model. I am not sure if others have posted this on this thread, but I felt it may be nice to just toss this out there if it wasn't already there.
    I've experienced a few issues with the servos so I replaced them all with savox. Eventually I had the esc fail which caused a dead engine landing, tough ol' bird though as it ended up almost undamaged despite landing in a tree.
    Its a good flyer, not fast but has nice flight qualities.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Vextren, Welcome to Hobby Squawk. Glad you're on board. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Vextren
    replied
    Perhaps I'm a little late to the party on this one, but I do not have experience with this bird, but from other HK product experience and testimony from some MIG17 owners I know, they said "the model itself is good. But the electronics are junk, throw them out and grab a set of freewing electronics and Frankenstein them in." Perhaps they have improved the electronics on the newer runs of the model. I am not sure if others have posted this on this thread, but I felt it may be nice to just toss this out there if it wasn't already there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardway
    replied
    Beautiful!!!! Both the plane and the countryside!!! Love it!! Blessing my Bro!!! Jerry Stay safe over there.

    Leave a comment:


  • WarbirdFan66
    replied
    Originally posted by Elbee

    WF, Great looking MiG, really like that livery. Pictures are worth a 1000 words, outstanding. Best, LB
    Thanks Elbee, i appreciate it :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by WarbirdFan66
    and here a few pictures of my last patrol with my egyptian MIG-17 over the Mark Brandenburg, north of Berlin...enjoy
    WF, Great looking MiG, really like that livery. Pictures are worth a 1000 words, outstanding. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • WarbirdFan66
    replied
    and here a few pictures of my last patrol with my egyptian MIG-17 over the Mark Brandenburg, north of Berlin...enjoy :pop

    Click image for larger version

Name:	01_DSC01987++++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	673
Size:	175.5 KB
ID:	251751Click image for larger version

Name:	02_DSC01954+++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	492
Size:	96.9 KB
ID:	251752Click image for larger version

Name:	03_DSC02056+++.edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	88.6 KB
ID:	251753
    Click image for larger version

Name:	06_DSC02083++ edited 1920_k300.JPG
Views:	587
Size:	39.7 KB
ID:	251755
    Click image for larger version

Name:	08_DSC02018++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	495
Size:	37.9 KB
ID:	251756
    Click image for larger version

Name:	09_DSC02101+++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	583
Size:	28.0 KB
ID:	251757
    Click image for larger version

Name:	10_DSC01984++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	585
Size:	37.1 KB
ID:	251758
    Click image for larger version

Name:	11_DSC02038+++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	647
Size:	160.3 KB
ID:	251759
    Click image for larger version

Name:	12_DSC02120+++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	571
Size:	219.2 KB
ID:	251760
    Click image for larger version

Name:	13_DSC02127+++ edited 1920_k300.jpg
Views:	644
Size:	164.8 KB
ID:	251761
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • t01ga
    replied
    Originally posted by Hardway
    I have the 3d cockpit from Pat, but the brake wells are just neat! Like a plastic scale model!! More work to do. And of course the landing light
    Thanks bud. That 3D cockpit is the best I have seen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardway
    replied
    I have the 3d cockpit from Pat, but the brake wells are just neat! Like a plastic scale model!! More work to do. And of course the landing light

    Leave a comment:


  • t01ga
    replied
    Hardway Thanks buddy, appreciate that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardway
    replied
    Fantastic!!! Love it!! Wow...

    Leave a comment:


  • t01ga
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A385E480-E9C5-4B05-A90C-4A0C3BDD3BD3.jpeg
Views:	875
Size:	79.2 KB
ID:	248582Click image for larger version

Name:	85A688D5-1019-40C6-97EA-46C4F8931B8C.jpeg
Views:	889
Size:	96.3 KB
ID:	248581Click image for larger version

Name:	9B891B33-BF1F-4190-8CE4-15D1FB01A15B.jpeg
Views:	838
Size:	78.4 KB
ID:	248580Click image for larger version

Name:	A6ED28C8-E6E5-4145-9306-D450FA405481.jpeg
Views:	824
Size:	89.9 KB
ID:	248579Click image for larger version

Name:	03E09B69-2258-4B0E-864D-0200FF00D208.jpeg
Views:	841
Size:	42.8 KB
ID:	248578 Some detail work... Some scale, some aren’t

    Leave a comment:

Working...