New to the forum with a UH1-D 800 series

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Astronome
    replied
    Yes I installed the tail rotor on the left side (like the real helicopter).
    With part VARIO 97/20
    Click image for larger version  Name:	8TlNMm (1).jpg Views:	0 Size:	76.6 KB ID:	346594

    There is also the spare part ROBAN:

    Leave a comment:


  • sfcfury
    replied
    Well the actual servo horn is what I meant- it looks like you flipped the tail over?

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Hi sfcfury,
    I using a SAVOX DIGITAL SC-1258TG 12kg-0.08s for the tail
    and 3 SAVOX DIGITAL SA-1256TG 20Kg.cm/6v for the head.

    Leave a comment:


  • sfcfury
    replied
    What are you using for the tail servo horn?

    Leave a comment:


  • sfcfury
    replied
    Looking good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    It's true DC, my old UH-1D weighed 23kg (50lbs) and the flight is totally different.

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome
    Hi,
    After the tests of the mechanics alone, I installed this one in the fuselage.
    8.4 kg on the scale, without model accessories.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5873_01.JPG
Views:	519
Size:	193.5 KB
ID:	346481

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5875_01.JPG
Views:	478
Size:	138.0 KB
ID:	346484

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5876_01.JPG
Views:	542
Size:	155.3 KB
ID:	346490



    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5885.JPG
Views:	498
Size:	97.8 KB
ID:	346487

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5887_01.JPG
Views:	473
Size:	91.6 KB
ID:	346489
    Looks awesome and yes you will be up over 20lbs when your done with it, I was worried about the weight on all the ones I have owned, not an issue when your flying them, makes it very scale........

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Hi,
    After the tests of the mechanics alone, I installed this one in the fuselage.
    8.4 kg on the scale, without model accessories.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5873_01.JPG
Views:	519
Size:	193.5 KB
ID:	346481

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5875_01.JPG
Views:	478
Size:	138.0 KB
ID:	346484

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5876_01.JPG
Views:	542
Size:	155.3 KB
ID:	346490



    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5885.JPG
Views:	498
Size:	97.8 KB
ID:	346487

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5887_01.JPG
Views:	473
Size:	91.6 KB
ID:	346489

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Hello PawPAw,

    Without the blades there were still some vibrations, but I think it was normal.
    I tightened the belt, there is now less vibration

    Leave a comment:


  • PawPaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome

    Hello F106DeltaDart
    That's exactly what I did.
    Balanced blades
    Verified Center of Gravity: Vibrations still present blades removed.
    Head removed: ditto
    I’m confused. How did blade angle fix vibrations that were present when the blades were removed and when the head was off?

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Yes sfcfury

    Leave a comment:


  • sfcfury
    replied
    It definitely happens to us all! So getting the blade pitch corrected- did that solve the issue?

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Yes I agree

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome
    Yes DC,

    but we must not forget that even after more than 30 years of model making we still make beginner mistakes.

    I really suck. Click image for larger version

Name:	943800.gif
Views:	522
Size:	6.9 KB
ID:	344515
    Yes sir, you got that one right, sometimes I'm like, why did I not check this or that first, we all do it......​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Yes DC,

    but we must not forget that even after more than 30 years of model making we still make beginner mistakes.

    I really suck. Click image for larger version

Name:	943800.gif
Views:	522
Size:	6.9 KB
ID:	344515

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome
    Hello DC,

    No, but I found where the great vibrations came from.
    A big difference of pitch between the 2 blades because a problem of one my 2 Digital Pitch Gauge.
    3 degree of difference :thumbsdown:
    Yep, that's the problem, don't forget this and I think a few people don't know this, you need to use a flat edged pitch gauge for the stock flat botton Roban blades, you get a true reading when the gauge is flat against the blade.

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Hello DC,

    No, but I found where the great vibrations came from.
    A big difference of pitch between the 2 blades because a problem of one my 2 Digital Pitch Gauge.
    3 degree of difference :thumbsdown:

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome
    Yes sfcfury, that's what I think too, but 5/100th of a millimeter is perhaps normal for machining the rotor shaft.

    Don't forget to pick me up if my English is too bad :pensive:

    Daniel
    Did you try it with head on but no tail shafts or tail blades or anything else hooked up??? Can you get us a video of the vibration??

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronome
    replied
    Yes sfcfury, that's what I think too, but 5/100th of a millimeter is perhaps normal for machining the rotor shaft.

    Don't forget to pick me up if my English is too bad :pensive:

    Daniel

    Leave a comment:


  • sfcfury
    replied
    Originally posted by Astronome

    Hello F106DeltaDart
    That's exactly what I did.
    Balanced blades
    Verified Center of Gravity: Vibrations still present blades removed.
    Head removed: ditto
    Well at this point, if you still that much vibration with the head off... either one of the torque drive shafts is caddy wompus, or just the main shaft is bent?

    Leave a comment:

Working...