What did you fly today?
Collapse
X
-
-
Flew the 10th flight on my Hairless Joe P-47D the other day, and tested the scale rectangular drop tank that was designed by Danger Dan and printed by CraftCloud due to the size being a bit more than my mini Prusa could handle. Came out pretty well, did a lot of sanding, filling, painting, etc. Finished in a neutral Grey USAAF color by Tamiya spray paints, and also weathered it with oil and fuel stains. Came out pretty well, flew well on the airplane, and dropped perfectly when jettisoned to a soft landing in the field with no damage at all.
Today, I flew my Flightline Cougar on its 56th flight, and my FMS P-47 Penrod and Sam on its 80th flight. Did a tank drop with it using the foam drop tank that comes with the kit. It's now a non-event to do this demonstration. Looks pretty cool and realistic when I punch if off as it passes by my position. Looking forward to receiving my new Flightline 1600mm P-51D later this week!
Leave a comment:
-
Got my 5th flight in today with my modified FMS 1.5M P-47 razorback, converted to a bubbletop. This one has a powered canopy, droppable centerline stores for drop tank, 3D printed cockpit and pilot, and some other details. Flies as well or better than the original razorback version. This airplane painted in the colors of P-47D-25 Hairless Joe flown by Col. David Schilling, 56th FG in 1944. Some pics taken from this morning. I believe that this modified 1.5M foamie P-47D is the only type in existence at this time.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Wow! Sounds like a GREAT time!! Of course, I love the P-47! Glad you guys had a good day for the fly-in as the weather cleared. Nice you guys have grass. We have lots of tumbleweeds, brambles, and sticky sagebrush that loves to eat model airplanes up here in northwestern Wyoming, but we have fun.Scale club day was fuuun.. overall
weather looked nasty early but cleared ,, i flew f4 and al37... but mooooorre importantly saw some awsome gas scale stuff a 90 inch p47 taking the cake(just 4 u dave) a nice decathalon,, seafury i think,,, a yak 54 3d plane.. with a 5 cy. 250 cc radial, what a sound and a 1930 s streamliner type not zure.. all large scale some pics
Thanks for posting the pics!
Cheers
DavegeeLeave a comment:
-
Scale club day was fuuun.. overall
weather looked nasty early but cleared ,, i flew f4 and al37... but mooooorre importantly saw some awsome gas scale stuff a 90 inch p47 taking the cake(just 4 u dave) a nice decathalon,, seafury i think,,, a yak 54 3d plane.. with a 5 cy. 250 cc radial, what a sound and a 1930 s streamliner type not zure.. all large scale some pics
4 PhotosLeave a comment:
-
Good stuff there, XViper! Makes a lot of sense. I usually "baby" my batteries both in storage and flying, and they usually last a long time with faithful service. I'm glad and relieved that my problems the other day with my Cougar were limited to a slightly puffing out battery that was probably on its last legs, anyway. All is well, now.IR is but once parameter that comes into play. Certainly, a consistent low IR can be an indicator of how well a battery will accept a charge and how evenly the cells will charge up. However, there's something else that can contribute to what has been talked about here. This has to do with power loss after take off, be it sudden or very early in the flight. I'm talking about "sag", something that I'm not completely well versed in but have noticed myself. I have batteries that have acceptable IR and charge up as they should - even cell voltages. Some are even not very old (a year or 2). I believe this sag is related to the "C" rating of the battery. We all know that C ratings are very often over-exaggerated with almost all brands of batteries. One brand's C rating may say 50C on the label but when loaded, they may only be 20C (as an example) and as they age, this discrepancy gets worse. Another brand's C rating may say the same 50C but when under load, may only 35 or 40C. Guess which one might sag worse. The interesting thing about some of these "high sag" batteries, is that when the power drops off, you land right away. Once down and disconnected for a minute, they can still read 70% or more. At times too, I've noticed these same batteries, after landing, would have very hot connectors. That becomes another tell tale sign of something amiss - haven't quite figured out precisely what that might be - maybe degrading soldering?
Brands that I have that don't seem to exhibit this (early) "sag", even older ones, are high C Admirals, SMC and ChinaHobbyLine.
Cheers
DavegeeLeave a comment:
-
As always thanx viper.. I believe HRB 50c r way lower than that.. it did fly well at 50 percent..
I do normally fly older batteries in props. Which makes sense.... Need some more new lipos and planes and just more stuff
. B safe thanx again
Leave a comment:
-
IR is but one parameter that comes into play. Certainly, a consistent low IR can be an indicator of how well a battery will accept a charge and how evenly the cells will charge up. However, there's something else that can contribute to what has been talked about here. This has to do with power loss after take off, be it sudden or very early in the flight. I'm talking about "sag", something that I'm not completely well versed in but have noticed myself. I have batteries that have acceptable IR and charge up as they should - even cell voltages. Some are even not very old (a year or 2). I believe this sag is related to the "C" rating of the battery. We all know that C ratings are very often over-exaggerated with almost all brands of batteries. One brand's C rating may say 50C on the label but when loaded, they may only be 20C (as an example) and as they age, this discrepancy gets worse. Another brand's C rating may say the same 50C but when under load, may only 35 or 40C. Guess which one might sag worse. The interesting thing about some of these "high sag" batteries, is that when the power drops off, you land right away. Once down and disconnected for a minute, they can still read 70% or more. At times too, I've noticed these same batteries, after landing, would have very hot connectors. That becomes another tell tale sign of something amiss - haven't quite figured out precisely what that might be - maybe degrading soldering?Good work Dave. Just bit of trivia 4 U.. my (bad battery). Has the same resistance as all my 8s batteries. Except the 2 brand new ones...which r way lower.. the 8s r working flawlessly. There must b other thing at play. Time Will tell. The new battery resistance between 2 and 3. Older ones between 4 and 5
Brands that I have that don't seem to exhibit this (early) "sag", even older ones, are high C Admirals, SMC and ChinaHobbyLine.Leave a comment:
-
Good work Dave. Just bit of trivia 4 U.. my (bad battery). Has the same resistance as all my 8s batteries. Except the 2 brand new ones...which r way lower.. the 8s r working flawlessly. There must b other thing at play. Time Will tell. The new battery resistance between 2 and 3. Older ones between 4 and 5Leave a comment:
-
The wind died down this evening so I went out to the field to test my F9F Cougar to confirm its problems yesterday were with a recalcitrant battery and not something tougher to determine the cause of the sudden power loss after takeoff. Turns out, it looks as I thought; with a new battery, it flew its best, as usual. No problems whatsoever. I did the first test flight with no ordnance, and when I got it back on the ground, I put all the bells and whistles on it to see if that might cause any problems. They didn't, both flights were great. XViper, I appreciate your helpful comments regarding what might have been wrong with my airplane. It was a battery, all right!
Photo taken after the second test flight with all the ordnance and refueling probe installed.
Cheers
Davegee
Leave a comment:
-
For me, batteries is still a learning in progress kind of thing. It's taken me years just to figure out some of the intricate details on the subject. New information still come to light that squashes old ideas and make me scratch my melon and wonder how I ever thought that to be right. There's still a lot of "magic" and oddness to battery tech in my mind. It's sometimes hard to stop listening to "old wives".
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for that info, XViper. I hope to improve my knowledge on batteries and power systems, going forward.The easiest way to check IR (internal resistance) is to let your LiPo charger do it for you. Of course, this is contingent upon your charger having this feature, which most modern chargers do. Once you get a LiPo started charging (it takes between 15 to 30 seconds for it to measure and display the IR, you should be able to scroll or flip through the various menu items without interfering or interrupting the charging process. (Or you can buy an Internal Resistance meter that will take a reading on its own. These can be purchased in places like Amazon or a hobby shop. They run around 30 US bucks, give or take, depending on how fancy you want to go.)
Here is a photo of my charger in action, showing the IR of one of my 5 year old 3 cell LiPos. The measurement shown tells me that this particular battery has very good IR. When the numbers start to get into double digits, you are looking at a LiPo that may be on it's final legs.
Cheers
DavegeeLeave a comment:
-
Thanks, Craig. It appears to me that my battery is going bad, especially when I tested it and another 6S battery of equal power and the suspect battery duplicated what I saw in the air on two flights when I exercised the flaps. The other new battery did not have any issues doing the same thing. If I had had another charged battery I would have taken it up again for the "acid test" of nailing the suspect battery and pull it out of the rotation.Dave I had that Sunday morning with my 90 fms Avanti 6s. I had a flight with an almost new 5000 HRB all good.. second flight. A 5 year old same HRB.. got off ground good but under continued load burbs and hesitation.. so landed... All cells equal... And checks as u would expect.. last flight. An almost new again. Not any trouble at all.
So think battery is capushca. Must learn how to check resistance. I will b honest 5 years is a good go at it... Have fun b safe
Too windy today, so I'll try later in the week for the tests. .Everything is waiting in my truck for a good, calm, morning to test this.
Cheers
DavegeeLeave a comment:
-
Thanx viper. Have 3 charger's.. I'm sure 1. Will do it
and I guess comparing new lipos. To that old 1. Will also give a hint
Leave a comment:
-
The easiest way to check IR (internal resistance) is to let your LiPo charger do it for you. Of course, this is contingent upon your charger having this feature, which most modern chargers do. Once you get a LiPo started charging (it takes between 15 to 30 seconds for it to measure and display the IR, you should be able to scroll or flip through the various menu items without interfering or interrupting the charging process. (Or you can buy an Internal Resistance meter that will take a reading on its own. These can be purchased in places like Amazon or a hobby shop. They run around 30 US bucks, give or take, depending on how fancy you want to go.)
Here is a photo of my charger in action, showing the IR of one of my 5 year old 3 cell LiPos. The measurement shown tells me that this particular battery has very good IR. When the numbers start to get into double digits, you are looking at a LiPo that may be on it's final legs.
Leave a comment:
-
Dave I had that Sunday morning with my 90 fms Avanti 6s. I had a flight with an almost new 5000 HRB all good.. second flight. A 5 year old same HRB.. got off ground good but under continued load burbs and hesitation.. so landed... All cells equal... And checks as u would expect.. last flight. An almost new again. Not any trouble at all.
So think battery is capushca. Must learn how to check resistance. I will b honest 5 years is a good go at it... Have fun b safeLeave a comment:
-
I flew two planes today. One is the F9F-7 Cougar and the other is my Flightline B-25J, Cactus Kitten. Even though I had not flown CK since last fall, everything went pretty well. I overcontrolled the steering on the first takeoff, but settled down after that. I made up several semi-scale "parafrag" bombs lowered by parachutes. I just installed two today for a general test. These are flown in scale fashion, very low to the ground, with the parachutes giving the bomber just enough time to get away before they explode on contact with the ground. I was happy with this first outing of the year for the B-25.After taking the winter off, my Freewing F9F Cougar took to the skies again today. I only got one flight in as the wind picked up after my first flight. What a great airplane! I maidened it last summer and today was my 47th successful flight so far. It has lots of ordnance, nose refueling boom, drop tanks, etc., but I left them at home today.
I'll attach a pic of it after the flight. If you look carefully under the nose you'll see the deployed printed speed brakes that I added from an STL that someone had. They work great, very functional and welcome at this alititude of 5000 feet MSL. I use them on every landing and sometimes to help slow it down during maneuvering.
Cheers
Davegee
Regarding the Cougar, I had some issues I have not experienced before. I used a 6S SMC 5000 battery. I have 57 flights on this aircraft already and have used this battery on many of the flights. Today, however, things were a bit different. Normal takeoff using takeoff flaps and full power takeoffs. Things were normal until I started to turn downwind and retract my flaps. When I did that, the power sagged quite a bit. I thought at first it might be a flameout, but it was still flying. I very carefully set up for a quick landing and that went well. I wasn't sure what happened. so I did a quick rebind of the receiver. Everything seemed ok, so I made another attempt at a quick flight. Same thing happened, and when it got on the ground the ESC made three "beeps" in quick succession and repeated until I disconnected the battery. Nor sure what that was all about, except some sort of warning.
I did a ground test with my battery from the B-25 flights. I ran it up to full power and then retracted the flaps. It stayed strong, but when I tried it with the SMC battery, it sagged again when the flaps were retracted. The battery was "puffed out" a bit, and I suspect it is no longer a flyable battery.
Tomorrow I will do another test with a new battery and see what happens. I have not had any difficulties with this airplane in all the flights I have put on it so far. so I'm hoping it will behave normally again.
I'll attach some pics of the B-25 after putting several flights on it this morning.
Cheers
Davegee
Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: