You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What did you fly today?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    IR is but once parameter that comes into play. Certainly, a consistent low IR can be an indicator of how well a battery will accept a charge and how evenly the cells will charge up. However, there's something else that can contribute to what has been talked about here. This has to do with power loss after take off, be it sudden or very early in the flight. I'm talking about "sag", something that I'm not completely well versed in but have noticed myself. I have batteries that have acceptable IR and charge up as they should - even cell voltages. Some are even not very old (a year or 2). I believe this sag is related to the "C" rating of the battery. We all know that C ratings are very often over-exaggerated with almost all brands of batteries. One brand's C rating may say 50C on the label but when loaded, they may only be 20C (as an example) and as they age, this discrepancy gets worse. Another brand's C rating may say the same 50C but when under load, may only 35 or 40C. Guess which one might sag worse. The interesting thing about some of these "high sag" batteries, is that when the power drops off, you land right away. Once down and disconnected for a minute, they can still read 70% or more. At times too, I've noticed these same batteries, after landing, would have very hot connectors. That becomes another tell tale sign of something amiss - haven't quite figured out precisely what that might be - maybe degrading soldering?
    Brands that I have that don't seem to exhibit this (early) "sag", even older ones, are high C Admirals, SMC and ChinaHobbyLine.
    Good stuff there, XViper! Makes a lot of sense. I usually "baby" my batteries both in storage and flying, and they usually last a long time with faithful service. I'm glad and relieved that my problems the other day with my Cougar were limited to a slightly puffing out battery that was probably on its last legs, anyway. All is well, now.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    As always thanx viper.. I believe HRB 50c r way lower than that.. it did fly well at 50 percent..
    I do normally fly older batteries in props. Which makes sense.... Need some more new lipos and planes and just more stuff . B safe thanx again

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by f4u ausie View Post
    Good work Dave. Just bit of trivia 4 U.. my (bad battery). Has the same resistance as all my 8s batteries. Except the 2 brand new ones...which r way lower.. the 8s r working flawlessly. There must b other thing at play. Time Will tell. The new battery resistance between 2 and 3. Older ones between 4 and 5
    IR is but one parameter that comes into play. Certainly, a consistent low IR can be an indicator of how well a battery will accept a charge and how evenly the cells will charge up. However, there's something else that can contribute to what has been talked about here. This has to do with power loss after take off, be it sudden or very early in the flight. I'm talking about "sag", something that I'm not completely well versed in but have noticed myself. I have batteries that have acceptable IR and charge up as they should - even cell voltages. Some are even not very old (a year or 2). I believe this sag is related to the "C" rating of the battery. We all know that C ratings are very often over-exaggerated with almost all brands of batteries. One brand's C rating may say 50C on the label but when loaded, they may only be 20C (as an example) and as they age, this discrepancy gets worse. Another brand's C rating may say the same 50C but when under load, may only 35 or 40C. Guess which one might sag worse. The interesting thing about some of these "high sag" batteries, is that when the power drops off, you land right away. Once down and disconnected for a minute, they can still read 70% or more. At times too, I've noticed these same batteries, after landing, would have very hot connectors. That becomes another tell tale sign of something amiss - haven't quite figured out precisely what that might be - maybe degrading soldering?
    Brands that I have that don't seem to exhibit this (early) "sag", even older ones, are high C Admirals, SMC and ChinaHobbyLine.

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    Good work Dave. Just bit of trivia 4 U.. my (bad battery). Has the same resistance as all my 8s batteries. Except the 2 brand new ones...which r way lower.. the 8s r working flawlessly. There must b other thing at play. Time Will tell. The new battery resistance between 2 and 3. Older ones between 4 and 5

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    The wind died down this evening so I went out to the field to test my F9F Cougar to confirm its problems yesterday were with a recalcitrant battery and not something tougher to determine the cause of the sudden power loss after takeoff. Turns out, it looks as I thought; with a new battery, it flew its best, as usual. No problems whatsoever. I did the first test flight with no ordnance, and when I got it back on the ground, I put all the bells and whistles on it to see if that might cause any problems. They didn't, both flights were great. XViper, I appreciate your helpful comments regarding what might have been wrong with my airplane. It was a battery, all right!

    Photo taken after the second test flight with all the ordnance and refueling probe installed.


    Cheers

    Davegee

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3594.jpg Views:	0 Size:	178.8 KB ID:	447693

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by davegee View Post

    Thanks for that info, XViper. I hope to improve my knowledge on batteries and power systems, going forward.

    Cheers

    Davegee
    For me, batteries is still a learning in progress kind of thing. It's taken me years just to figure out some of the intricate details on the subject. New information still come to light that squashes old ideas and make me scratch my melon and wonder how I ever thought that to be right. There's still a lot of "magic" and oddness to battery tech in my mind. It's sometimes hard to stop listening to "old wives".

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    The easiest way to check IR (internal resistance) is to let your LiPo charger do it for you. Of course, this is contingent upon your charger having this feature, which most modern chargers do. Once you get a LiPo started charging (it takes between 15 to 30 seconds for it to measure and display the IR, you should be able to scroll or flip through the various menu items without interfering or interrupting the charging process. (Or you can buy an Internal Resistance meter that will take a reading on its own. These can be purchased in places like Amazon or a hobby shop. They run around 30 US bucks, give or take, depending on how fancy you want to go.)
    Here is a photo of my charger in action, showing the IR of one of my 5 year old 3 cell LiPos. The measurement shown tells me that this particular battery has very good IR. When the numbers start to get into double digits, you are looking at a LiPo that may be on it's final legs.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image0.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	106.2 KB
ID:	447649
    Thanks for that info, XViper. I hope to improve my knowledge on batteries and power systems, going forward.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by f4u ausie View Post
    Dave I had that Sunday morning with my 90 fms Avanti 6s. I had a flight with an almost new 5000 HRB all good.. second flight. A 5 year old same HRB.. got off ground good but under continued load burbs and hesitation.. so landed... All cells equal... And checks as u would expect.. last flight. An almost new again. Not any trouble at all.
    So think battery is capushca. Must learn how to check resistance. I will b honest 5 years is a good go at it... Have fun b safe
    Thanks, Craig. It appears to me that my battery is going bad, especially when I tested it and another 6S battery of equal power and the suspect battery duplicated what I saw in the air on two flights when I exercised the flaps. The other new battery did not have any issues doing the same thing. If I had had another charged battery I would have taken it up again for the "acid test" of nailing the suspect battery and pull it out of the rotation.

    Too windy today, so I'll try later in the week for the tests. .Everything is waiting in my truck for a good, calm, morning to test this.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    Thanx viper. Have 3 charger's.. I'm sure 1. Will do it and I guess comparing new lipos. To that old 1. Will also give a hint

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by f4u ausie View Post
    Must learn how to check resistance.
    The easiest way to check IR (internal resistance) is to let your LiPo charger do it for you. Of course, this is contingent upon your charger having this feature, which most modern chargers do. Once you get a LiPo started charging (it takes between 15 to 30 seconds for it to measure and display the IR, you should be able to scroll or flip through the various menu items without interfering or interrupting the charging process. (Or you can buy an Internal Resistance meter that will take a reading on its own. These can be purchased in places like Amazon or a hobby shop. They run around 30 US bucks, give or take, depending on how fancy you want to go.)
    Here is a photo of my charger in action, showing the IR of one of my 5 year old 3 cell LiPos. The measurement shown tells me that this particular battery has very good IR. When the numbers start to get into double digits, you are looking at a LiPo that may be on it's final legs.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image0.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	106.2 KB
ID:	447649

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    Dave I had that Sunday morning with my 90 fms Avanti 6s. I had a flight with an almost new 5000 HRB all good.. second flight. A 5 year old same HRB.. got off ground good but under continued load burbs and hesitation.. so landed... All cells equal... And checks as u would expect.. last flight. An almost new again. Not any trouble at all.
    So think battery is capushca. Must learn how to check resistance. I will b honest 5 years is a good go at it... Have fun b safe

    Leave a comment:


  • jetfool
    replied
    Two Beautiful aircraft plus the surrounding view. Good job.

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by davegee View Post
    After taking the winter off, my Freewing F9F Cougar took to the skies again today. I only got one flight in as the wind picked up after my first flight. What a great airplane! I maidened it last summer and today was my 47th successful flight so far. It has lots of ordnance, nose refueling boom, drop tanks, etc., but I left them at home today.

    I'll attach a pic of it after the flight. If you look carefully under the nose you'll see the deployed printed speed brakes that I added from an STL that someone had. They work great, very functional and welcome at this alititude of 5000 feet MSL. I use them on every landing and sometimes to help slow it down during maneuvering.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3557.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	172.4 KB
ID:	447012
    I flew two planes today. One is the F9F-7 Cougar and the other is my Flightline B-25J, Cactus Kitten. Even though I had not flown CK since last fall, everything went pretty well. I overcontrolled the steering on the first takeoff, but settled down after that. I made up several semi-scale "parafrag" bombs lowered by parachutes. I just installed two today for a general test. These are flown in scale fashion, very low to the ground, with the parachutes giving the bomber just enough time to get away before they explode on contact with the ground. I was happy with this first outing of the year for the B-25.

    Regarding the Cougar, I had some issues I have not experienced before. I used a 6S SMC 5000 battery. I have 57 flights on this aircraft already and have used this battery on many of the flights. Today, however, things were a bit different. Normal takeoff using takeoff flaps and full power takeoffs. Things were normal until I started to turn downwind and retract my flaps. When I did that, the power sagged quite a bit. I thought at first it might be a flameout, but it was still flying. I very carefully set up for a quick landing and that went well. I wasn't sure what happened. so I did a quick rebind of the receiver. Everything seemed ok, so I made another attempt at a quick flight. Same thing happened, and when it got on the ground the ESC made three "beeps" in quick succession and repeated until I disconnected the battery. Nor sure what that was all about, except some sort of warning.

    I did a ground test with my battery from the B-25 flights. I ran it up to full power and then retracted the flaps. It stayed strong, but when I tried it with the SMC battery, it sagged again when the flaps were retracted. The battery was "puffed out" a bit, and I suspect it is no longer a flyable battery.

    Tomorrow I will do another test with a new battery and see what happens. I have not had any difficulties with this airplane in all the flights I have put on it so far. so I'm hoping it will behave normally again.

    I'll attach some pics of the B-25 after putting several flights on it this morning.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3592.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	122.7 KB
ID:	447643 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3590.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	173.4 KB
ID:	447644 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3591.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	220.2 KB
ID:	447645

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    After taking the winter off, my Freewing F9F Cougar took to the skies again today. I only got one flight in as the wind picked up after my first flight. What a great airplane! I maidened it last summer and today was my 47th successful flight so far. It has lots of ordnance, nose refueling boom, drop tanks, etc., but I left them at home today.

    I'll attach a pic of it after the flight. If you look carefully under the nose you'll see the deployed printed speed brakes that I added from an STL that someone had. They work great, very functional and welcome at this alititude of 5000 feet MSL. I use them on every landing and sometimes to help slow it down during maneuvering.

    Cheers

    Davegee

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3557.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	172.4 KB
ID:	447012

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Thanks Elbee and f4u ausie , always appreciate the compliments. Would love to have you both at next years electric event. I'll ask my "buddy" DJT to send Air Force One around to pick you guys up! If they can send it for the USA Hockey Team, both of you should be a Shoo In!

    I'm lucky to be able to fly at an outstanding field. We have an East/West runway (prevailing Easterly Winds) of 70 Feet by 1000 Feet (which I still sometimes miss ) as well as a 60 feet by 500 foot North/South runway for those unusual winds where mostly the Heli's get to fly. We also have electric hookups, 5 pilot stations and covered pit areas to setup our aircraft and stay somewhat cool in the 90 degree summer heat with 15 large benches. Our runways are cut to 1/2" height making take-off for electrics a breeze. What more could you ask for! We do have the occasional alligator and herds of deer show up at the field, but now that I'm the New Field Security Officer, we've found that gator indeed takes like chicken and there's nothing like a fresh venison steak on the barbi!

    Click image for larger version  Name:	AMPS Field 3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	71.6 KB ID:	444840

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    As always great pics hugh. Yours are of course the best paint jobs on the planet

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Hugh Wiedman,

    WOW!

    Great Event, Sir.

    Envious, obviously, as I would have loved to have been there.

    You own a great stable my friend.

    And that ambush pass through the trees.... "Gutsiest move I ever saw, Mav."

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    And a few others to round out the field:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Mig 29.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	55.1 KB
ID:	444758 Click image for larger version

Name:	BAE Hawk 1.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	77.8 KB
ID:	444759 Click image for larger version

Name:	A10.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	60.2 KB
ID:	444760 Click image for larger version

Name:	Beaver 1.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	77.7 KB
ID:	444761 Click image for larger version

Name:	Beaver 4.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	52.3 KB
ID:	444762 Click image for larger version

Name:	BeGee.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	55.8 KB
ID:	444763 Click image for larger version

Name:	Bushman.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	68.4 KB
ID:	444764 Click image for larger version

Name:	C130 1.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	64.7 KB
ID:	444765 Click image for larger version

Name:	F14.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	68.7 KB
ID:	444766 Click image for larger version

Name:	F22 C.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	444767 Click image for larger version

Name:	B-190.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	37.5 KB
ID:	444768 Click image for larger version

Name:	Civilian.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	56.0 KB
ID:	444769 Click image for larger version

Name:	Gilmore 1.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	65.6 KB
ID:	444770 Click image for larger version

Name:	Heli 1.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	81.6 KB
ID:	444771 Click image for larger version

Name:	Heli 2.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	278.2 KB
ID:	444772 Click image for larger version

Name:	Hellcat.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	49.2 KB
ID:	444773 Click image for larger version

Name:	Hercules 1.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	201.7 KB
ID:	444774 Click image for larger version

Name:	ME 262 1.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	76.5 KB
ID:	444775 Click image for larger version

Name:	P51- 3.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	186.4 KB
ID:	444776 Click image for larger version

Name:	SkyHawk 1.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	72.7 KB
ID:	444777

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Let's see some other great electrics!! The next few are Jorge Valverdi's large scale balsa electric, with wing spans of over 6 feet. He flies them on either 2 6S 10,000's (single engine) or 4 6S 10,000's for close to 15 minutes. Who needs those noisy gas engines and the associated clean up!.

    His incredible B17:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B17 10.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	274.3 KB
ID:	444742 Click image for larger version

Name:	B17 9.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	141.7 KB
ID:	444743 Click image for larger version

Name:	B17.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	146.6 KB
ID:	444744 Click image for larger version

Name:	B17 3.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	69.8 KB
ID:	444745 Click image for larger version

Name:	B17 5.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	65.1 KB
ID:	444746 Click image for larger version

Name:	B17 6.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	57.9 KB
ID:	444747

    Now His Magnificent F4U Corsair:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	FU Corsair.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	248.1 KB
ID:	444748 Click image for larger version

Name:	FU Bombs2.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	77.3 KB
ID:	444749 Click image for larger version

Name:	FU Bombs3.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	81.0 KB
ID:	444750 Click image for larger version

Name:	P40 3.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	59.2 KB
ID:	444751 Click image for larger version

Name:	P40 2.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	50.1 KB
ID:	444752 Click image for larger version

Name:	P47 1.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	61.5 KB
ID:	444753 Click image for larger version

Name:	FW 190 1.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	128.8 KB
ID:	444754 Click image for larger version

Name:	FW 190 2.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	63.1 KB
ID:	444755 Click image for larger version

Name:	Tiger Cat2.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	70.1 KB
ID:	444756

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Last Group of Mine, Thank God!!!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Corsair 3.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	75.0 KB
ID:	444736 Click image for larger version

Name:	Corsair 2.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	93.4 KB
ID:	444738 Click image for larger version

Name:	Corsair 1.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	74.9 KB
ID:	444737 Click image for larger version

Name:	Corsair Tiger Cat.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	58.7 KB
ID:	444739 Lets Shoot down a Tiger Cat for Fun!!! Click image for larger version

Name:	FW 190 6.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	444740

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X