Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman
View Post
Sorry to see that, but not uncommon. Since you already have a DX7, suggest you use the Spektrum RX as well. The new AR637T/8370T/10360T Plus recievers have served me well. Not a huge fan of Horizon Hobby aircraft anymore (Freewing/FlightLine/FMS Fan Boy), but their RX's IMO are great, but a little expensive (not as expensive as losing an aircraft and battery though).
Since I converted everything to one of those RX's with Plus, my signal reception has been nothing short of spectacular. 0 frame losses (unheard off) and of course 0 holds (the demon of signal loss). Use their satellite RX's as well in all EDF's so I have 4 antennae's oriented in every possible directional plane (forward and backward of an antennae is it's blind spot). And the Plus upgrade has made landings incredibly easy. On prop planes I don't add a satellite, as it seems RX interference is greater with the EDF's and the prop motor and ESC are usually up front allowing the 2 antennae from the RX to go back and be clear of the battery (another big RX signal interferer) and ESC. I used to battle with frame losses and holds (even with Spektrum's older RX's) and lost a couple where I had the antennae too close to either the battery, carbon fiber tubes or ESC and it's cables. No issues anymore.
Every plane you have will have a slightly different issue with RX reception, based upon antennae placement, carbon fiber tubes, ESC and cable interference and battery placement. So you cannot compare one to another, which will only tell you if you have a problem with the TX signal. Hey, look at Chris Wolfes (RC Geek) loss of his new huge gasser T-28 he's been building, an IX 20 TX and using the wrong older "park flyer" RX from spektrum he had laying around. Saving a hundred bucks on a RX he destroyed thousands in an aircraft he spent 4 months building, all in a matter of seconds. If it can happen to him, we have no chance! In the past I had a hell of a time getting a decent signal with an older AR636 Spektrum gyro RX in my B-24's, getting more than 150 frame losses per flight and sometimes several holds
. Since going to a newer AR637T with a satellite, problems solved. One of my first EDF's was a Stinger 90. At that time, I had no knowledge of "signal Interference" and placed the RX (an AR636) in the easiest place I could find and ran the single antennae along the fuse over a carbon fiber tube next to the battery.
My older TX had no call outs on frame losses or holds, so completely unaware of impending disaster even after doing a range check. After maybe 40 successful flights, on the downwind leg getting read to land, it just kept going, never to be seen by me again. Ended up out in the Everglades eaten by gators and pythons (that's a long story on how I know). After, got another and sat with a knowledgeable RC guy and he showed me that my antennae placement was the worse possible solution I could have come up. Since then, I've found that your RX location and especially the antennae orientation is the single biggest issue on building out a new aircraft. Do it right, you're OK, wrong and it's gone!I'm sure there are other excellent RX's out there, but I can vouch for the new Spektrum Plus RX's. The gyro capabilities are incredible and the included telemetry of in-flight pack voltage callouts/warnings have unfortunately exposed the only flaw left-My poor flying skills!

Hang in there!
Davegee

.png)

so at the end, no idea really.. mayb my dynam detrum finally let me, down need to replace, all rx in remaing planes,, i fly my f4 phantom on dx7,, but hav only 1 rx, 4 that.. all ln all it can b tuff b safe hav fun

I think he knows as much or more than anyone about these things.
"So get the lead out" as they used to say on the radio before playing Led Zeppelin
Leave a comment: