You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Freewing 80mm MiG-21 Fishbed Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by MeyerVW View Post
    Here it is. Love the look I got and I am very happy so far. Waiting on a nose brace and fire booty. When flap are deployed is there any need for elevator trim?
    I have not found elevator trim with flaps necessary on mine.

    Comment


    • Need more time with this bird. Not to bad but work is needed for better flying on my end.
       

      Comment


      • Don't be afraid to slow her down.. Not like when I almost hit the trees :} but you know what I mean

         

        Comment


        • I like your North Vietnam and the Polish schemes. Nice job guys.
          Don't just fly--WREAK HAVOC!!!

          Comment


          • Can anybody comment about the low speed handling of this model? What happens in an accelerated stall? Any bad traits in a normal power on/off stall?

            Comment


            • I am always amazed by the flight envelope of this jet. It can fly as slow or slower than any Freewing jet I own, does bat turns, if it stalls I didn't even notice! Seriously, why stall it? You can bring it to a stop in high alpha and fly right out. It goes where it is pointed and does great 4 point rolls, KE, the works. Only fault IMHO is it is draggy and eats batteries pretty quick, it's no glider. Of course it is on the "hard to see" side, I use a gyro and think it helps to lock it in to any flight attitude. Oh, it is great in high winds and is truly great in a crosswind, it will land as slow as you dare, I would choose it for the shortest runways. Just looking at it it doesn't make sense, but there you are.

              Comment


              • Its a fun aircraft. Flew it some more. FUN FUN.
                 

                Comment


                • Is there a mod to make the drop tanks removable? I assume I could just use magnets, but I would worry about loosing one under "G" and I bet that is not fun!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Husafreak View Post
                    I am always amazed by the flight envelope of this jet. It can fly as slow or slower than any Freewing jet I own, does bat turns, if it stalls I didn't even notice! Seriously, why stall it? You can bring it to a stop in high alpha and fly right out. It goes where it is pointed and does great 4 point rolls, KE, the works. Only fault IMHO is it is draggy and eats batteries pretty quick, it's no glider. Of course it is on the "hard to see" side, I use a gyro and think it helps to lock it in to any flight attitude. Oh, it is great in high winds and is truly great in a crosswind, it will land as slow as you dare, I would choose it for the shortest runways. Just looking at it it doesn't make sense, but there you are.

                    How is it without the gyro? I have thought about one, but that is just one more thing to go wrong....

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Dave Wave View Post
                      Is there a mod to make the drop tanks removable? I assume I could just use magnets, but I would worry about loosing one under "G" and I bet that is not fun!
                      They are removeable and come with magnets. The only time I've had them come off was on a hard landing.

                      Comment


                      • I just glued the rear fuselage on mine and have a bit of an issue. I used BSI foam-cure, but did not realize that it bubbles a bit as it cures. Given the large surface area being glued, it pushed the two parts apart as the glue cured. I have a gap of about 1.2mm at the top and .8mm at the bottom. It was out enough that it cause the holes for the rudder mount screws to be mis-aligned by about 1/8 th inch.

                        Did anybody else run into this before? Did it create trim issues?

                        I would normally just run with it , but I am doing a turbine conversion, so the stakes are higher. A new fuselage is $100 plus a couple days of work lost.

                        I am not worried about the strength of the joint, but the mis-alignment of the tail assembly creating a control problem.

                        Any thoughts?

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	Mig Gap.jpg Views:	0 Size:	228.1 KB ID:	339248

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Dave Wave View Post
                          I just glued the rear fuselage on mine and have a bit of an issue. I used BSI foam-cure, but did not realize that it bubbles a bit as it cures. Given the large surface area being glued, it pushed the two parts apart as the glue cured. I have a gap of about 1.2mm at the top and .8mm at the bottom. It was out enough that it cause the holes for the rudder mount screws to be mis-aligned by about 1/8 th inch.

                          Did anybody else run into this before? Did it create trim issues?

                          I would normally just run with it , but I am doing a turbine conversion, so the stakes are higher. A new fuselage is $100 plus a couple days of work lost.

                          I am not worried about the strength of the joint, but the mis-alignment of the tail assembly creating a control problem.

                          Any thoughts?

                          Click image for larger version Name:	Mig Gap.jpg Views:	0 Size:	228.1 KB ID:	339248
                          Is the gap just top to bottom or top to bottom and a bit of left to right/right to left. Wider at the top means you are about 1mm down at the back of the thrust tube which is not a lot but might lead to a small amount of nose down thrust as you throttle on. If this is the case you may be able to correct with throttle to elevator trim mix so that the elevator trim goes up in proportion to the thrust if it becomes critical. Also a touch of normal elevator up trim might be required on maiden flight as wing to horizontal tail incidences may have changed a fraction also inducing a touch of down into the calculation affecting normal angle of attack/stance of the model in the air. Difficult to judge without setting the model up on the bench and taking offset measurements from parallel lines both side of the fuselage for left to right but again this could be trimmed out. When you consider that the Dynam ME262 had a thrust line way below the wings and I got that to work with some throttle/elevator trim ( around 10percent ) and resetting the horizontal tail incidence to a better position then I would have thought that the amount of difference in thrust line you have could be trimmed out. I do not know anything about turbines but if you are using a thrust tube liner perhaps you might look at fitting and re aligning a suitable thrust tube to bring the trust line back on course so to speak depending on the thrust tube dia calcs. Well, right or wrong those those are my thoughts and no doubt others will give you more. Good luck..

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Dave Wave View Post
                            Is there a mod to make the drop tanks removable? I assume I could just use magnets, but I would worry about loosing one under "G" and I bet that is not fun!
                            Just double the number of magnets, you are more likely to loose the drop tanks on landing than flying

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	F86 drop tank.jpg
Views:	827
Size:	95.2 KB
ID:	339278

                            Comment


                            • Quick question...do both current versions of the MIG come with ribbon connectors for the wings? I hate dealing with spaghetti at the field before flying.

                              TIA!!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by southernmd_man View Post
                                Quick question...do both current versions of the MIG come with ribbon connectors for the wings? I hate dealing with spaghetti at the field before flying.

                                TIA!!
                                My silver one did....

                                Comment


                                • Comment


                                  • Originally posted by dr.Tom View Post
                                    was thinking of getting one of those, but decided on the SU35 instead...

                                    Comment


                                    • My Mig 21 Fishbed with full armament right before the maiden. She flew beautifully.


                                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Mig 21 at 114th - 2.jpg
Views:	463
Size:	193.3 KB
ID:	344898

                                      Comment


                                      • Hello everybody!

                                        The MiG-21 is my first edf jet and the threads here and on rcgroups have been very helpful in preparing my MiG-21 for the first flights. It's a great model, much fun and thrill to fly, especially with other jets in the air. My brother has built a FlyFly Mirage last summer and persuaded me to buy an edf model, too. I like the classic jets and the MiG has always been one of my favourites. Since October last year I count 60 flights. No need to be nervous anymore but I'm still improving my landings on our narrow landing strip.


                                        First flights have been in silver with a bad visibility in winter weather but silver is a good basis to apply a different colour scheme. I installed the Multiplex lights which are great for sunset flights. Landing lights are installed in the wheel bay in a slight downward angle and I can switch them on/off via the transmitter.
                                        When doing research on the internet I found a huge variety of colours and the decision what to choose was difficult. In the end I came up with the rather simple but rare Finnish version. The advantage is a simple pattern (easy to apply) and huge markings so it's possible to recognise details in a low flyby, even reading the aircraft number on the fuselage.
                                        The story about how Finland got their MiG-21 is interesting and I found a nice interview from one of their pilots:


                                        Kind regards, Timo

                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9557.JPG
Views:	932
Size:	470.2 KB
ID:	347026
                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9560.JPG
Views:	889
Size:	287.7 KB
ID:	347027
                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9564.JPG
Views:	864
Size:	275.5 KB
ID:	347028
                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6014.JPG
Views:	874
Size:	452.0 KB
ID:	347029
                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	HEMS6499[1].jpg
Views:	871
Size:	30.8 KB
ID:	347030

                                        Comment


                                        • Nicely done Timo. One of the more aggressive color schemes for what is anyway, an aggressive design shape. Should be a very good scheme for orientation purposes.

                                          Almost makes me go out and buy another silver version before they stop production .

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X