The T33 has been mentioned. Maybe in "Hot Red". Project Foil is apparently not bare aluminum....
Ah the Red Knight! I saw his performance years ago. It was pretty cool. He took off while another act was in the air. Some time went past and the announcer was talking keeping us all distracted. He paused and then said ,"Ladies and Gentlemen, The Red Knight" BOOM, he does a low high speed pass, scared the :Poo: out of me and thousands of others who were there. I've never forgot that !
Raptor is what I keep hoping for. I just hope it isn't a single 90. (I've taken a real dislike to thrust loss on those bifurb exhausts) 80 mm twin would be sweet though.
[QUOTE=wolpertinger;n157196]Man the project names are really fodder for the mind. Project Hoot was an L39; Project Bond was the F4; Project Virtue was the A4; Project Tennyson50 was the liberator. How did the names really tell what the plane was.
[/QUOTE
That's the thing about project names... they're created for Internal Use for security purposes, so the names aren't supposed to clearly tell what the plane is. There is a logic to the names I designate, but even with the clues I've given it's clear that they could be interpreted in a variety of ways, which is the point. Spies everywhere. :)
Yea the 80 mm F-5 is great flying jet, I have two of them but I still want a T-38, preferably single 70 mm 6s set up just like the V2 F-16.... Another great flying jet.. So smooth and the arctic paint scheme looks great in the air...
That's an old Sebart kit, that got a Freewing revamp recently. Not being sold in the US, and is not one of the planes being developed in conjunction with MRC.
Leave a comment: