Official Freewing MiG-29 Fulcrum Twin 80mm Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kallend
    replied
    OK, thanks, guys. Chokes on order.


    Incidentally, it's not for a MiG. I'm using the PWM feature of an Arduino to drive a high power LED and want to avoid noise on the power line feeding back into the Rx.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    I have had several Eflite planes and I recall that on a couple of them, rather than using those green rings (like wedding rings), they use those "chokes" on the throttle lead. Even when using those chokes, they wrapped the lead in and out of the choke several times just like on the green rings.

    Leave a comment:


  • GliderGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by kallend

    Thanks, but I was hoping for something more specific than a range from 3mm to 13mm, most of which would be redundant.
    You will use 2 of the 13 mm near the ESC body. Then I added a 3 or 5 mm by each FFS servo…not much room back there.

    I ordered a multi-pak and have dipped into it on several occasions…and will again when my PJ50 gets here. Handy to have redundantly on hand.

    -GG

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    EDIT: Site (or my browser) went berserk and posted same thing 3 times.

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    Thanks, but I was hoping for something more specific than a range from 3mm to 13mm, most of which would be redundant.

    Leave a comment:


  • jasmith41
    replied
    Originally posted by kallend
    To those (GG?) who have put ferrite rings on the long servo leads, do you have a link to a source?
    Amazon.com: Ceedmon 20 Pieces Clip-on Ferrite Ring Core RFI EMI Noise Suppressor Cable Clip for 3mm/5mm/7mm/9mm/13mm Diameter Cable, Black : Industrial & Scientific

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    To those (GG?) who have put ferrite rings on the long servo leads, do you have a link to a source?

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Pretty sure people have posted it before in both this and the RCG thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ironside
    replied
    Anyone know the total thrust (in newtons and/or lbs) the Mig 29 is pushing on two 6S batteries?

    Leave a comment:


  • Luqman Khan
    replied
    Many thanks for sharing your experience - i guess I'll have to start with process of elimination as you suggested.

    Its good that i'm able to easily reproduce the issue on bench so I'll know for sure when it works.

    Originally posted by Evan D
    In MY experience what you are describing is normally caused by feedback in the servo leads caused by resistance. Normally a bad connection at an extension connection or something similar. Remember the MCBe is basically a bunch of Y connectors. I think when you increase the supply voltage it’s pushing through this extra resistance causing the feed back.

    What you need to do is track down the source of the resistance and correct or eliminate it. It may be dirty connections, bad solder joints in the MCBe, servo wires that are close to other wires (the chokes are a great fix if this is the cause but also twisting the servo wires can help if this is the issue ), or what ever.

    The thing is that you still have an issue even though you are reducing the symptoms by increasing the voltage. If it was me I would bypass the MCBe with standard extensions and Y’s as a first step.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    In MY experience what you are describing is normally caused by feedback in the servo leads caused by resistance. Normally a bad connection at an extension connection or something similar. Remember the MCBe is basically a bunch of Y connectors. I think when you increase the supply voltage it’s pushing through this extra resistance causing the feed back.

    What you need to do is track down the source of the resistance and correct or eliminate it. It may be dirty connections, bad solder joints in the MCBe, servo wires that are close to other wires (the chokes are a great fix if this is the cause but also twisting the servo wires can help if this is the issue ), or what ever.

    The thing is that you still have an issue even though you are reducing the symptoms by increasing the voltage. If it was me I would bypass the MCBe with standard extensions and Y’s as a first step.

    Leave a comment:


  • GliderGuy
    replied
    Hi crxpatman,

    Sorry for the confusion whereby I mixed in a different topic as an FYI. The RF chokes are not meant to address your chattering servo issue...which I gather was happening without the EDF fans running.

    The info on the RF chokes was presented for your edification regarding RF noise generated by the ESCs when the fans are running. This "may' cause a complete loss of control as the noise may upset the pointer in the look-up table that the TX and RX are using when the binding/linking process takes place.

    So to make things absolutely clear: (1) I don't have any inputs or suggestions for your chattering servo issue. (2) The RF choke info is to potentially prevent you from having a loss of control event due to the RF noise generated by ESCs during flight.

    Hope that clears it up.

    -GG

    Leave a comment:


  • Luqman Khan
    replied
    Thanks Evan - makes sense that its the individual components connecting to MCBe that have different tolerances for voltage.

    Any idea about why my control surfaces attached to blue box (rudder, flaps, ailerons) would start automatic deflections (minor deflections but visible) when I switched from stock BEC to Castle BEC - here're my observations:

    1. Stock BEC - no issues.
    2. Switched to Castle 10amp BEC set at 5.1v: started getting servo chatter + surface deflections for anything connected to MCBe. Stock elevator servos were direct to receiver and no problems there. I also checked the telemetry data and receiver was outputting 5v to 4.9v (it kept oscillating between this range).
    3. I changed Castle output to 5v and then 4.9v and 4.8v: with each drop the chatter and servo movements became more pronounced.
    4. Finally I changed to 5.2v and everything went to normal and then for peace of mind I changed to 5.3v output at Castle BEC -- and no issues since then. I checked the telemetry and I get readings of 5.2 to 5.3v for receiver output.



    Originally posted by Evan D
    The MCBe (blue box) isn't the issue with voltage, it's the items connected to the MCBe. The stock servos are okay up to 6 volts easy. The retracts are good to about 5.5. There is a sequencer in the MCBe and it's probably okay to over 5.5 but it doesn't matter because the retracts aren't. Last is the LED output slots. The LEDs themselves are 3-3.3V and there is a tiny resistor on each LED output that cuts the voltage the BEC supplies down a fraction. If you increase the input voltage the resistors reduction may not be down to the 3-3.3V the LED can handle and you may blow a LED. All that said 5.5 is the max you want to supply to the MCBe but it's because of the retracts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    The MCBe (blue box) isn't the issue with voltage, it's the items connected to the MCBe. The stock servos are okay up to 6 volts easy. The retracts are good to about 5.5. There is a sequencer in the MCBe and it's probably okay to over 5.5 but it doesn't matter because the retracts aren't. Last is the LED output slots. The LEDs themselves are 3-3.3V and there is a tiny resistor on each LED output that cuts the voltage the BEC supplies down a fraction. If you increase the input voltage the resistors reduction may not be down to the 3-3.3V the LED can handle and you may blow a LED. All that said 5.5 is the max you want to supply to the MCBe but it's because of the retracts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luqman Khan
    replied
    Thanks crxmanpat ... so I am well within limits at 5.3v (good to know).

    GG,
    In my case increasing the voltage increase (from 5.1 to 5.3v) fixed the servo chatter & automatic deflection of control surfaces that I was experiencing. I do have a choke on Bec cable but it seems my issue might not be related to interference else increasing output voltage from BEC (going to receiver and blue box) won't have fixed it (everything else being equal).

    Originally posted by GliderGuy

    I found this article / additional information.

    https://www.promodeler.com/caseSTUDY...reewing-Mig-29

    FYI..I am using two MKS HV69 in my MiG-29 to drive the FFSs. The downside is that MKS doesn't offer a reverse version (or they didn't at the time I ordered). Rather than open one up and rewire it, I decided to install a servo reverser. The Futaba SR-10 was ordered. It has performed flawlessly for several thousand flights** and is very stable to ambient temperature changes. Some folks shy away from reversers, but the SR-10 has served me well.

    For the hardware: heavy duty DUBRO connectors and a threaded 4-40 rod cut to length.

    Also, you may wish to search the forum for RF chokes or ferrite chokes or just chokes. Read and learn. I use several of these on all my high-current ESC EDF birds. The MiG has 7 of them. Overkill? Maybe. But how many individual MiGs are flying that have several thousand flights logged w/o a single radio glitch? Here are the locations:

    One small choke near each FFS servo (as close to the MKS HV69 as possible). There's a nice pocket ahead of each servo.
    One larger choke on each ESC mounted as close to the ESC as possible on the battery side.
    The green ferrite ring that comes stock.
    I added another small one near the green ring.
    The SR-10 came with its own.

    Yep...that's a total of 7 chokes. Like I said...probably overkill, but the set-up is extremely flight proven.**

    I'm gun shy after crashing an A-10 twice and an F-4 twice from loss of control events which a HAM Radio friend said was likely due to the noise generated by the high-current ESCs. Zero loss of control events since I started using the extra RF chokes on my high-current ESC EDFs.

    -GG

    **Estimated somewhat more than 2500 flights.

    Leave a comment:


  • GliderGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by crxmanpat
    Motion has said 5.5v max.
    I found this article / additional information.

    https://www.promodeler.com/caseSTUDY...reewing-Mig-29

    FYI..I am using two MKS HV69 in my MiG-29 to drive the FFSs. The downside is that MKS doesn't offer a reverse version (or they didn't at the time I ordered). Rather than open one up and rewire it, I decided to install a servo reverser. The Futaba SR-10 was ordered. It has performed flawlessly for several thousand flights** and is very stable to ambient temperature changes. Some folks shy away from reversers, but the SR-10 has served me well.

    For the hardware: heavy duty DUBRO connectors and a threaded 4-40 rod cut to length.

    ***SOAPBOX TIME***

    Also, you may wish to search the forum for RF chokes or ferrite chokes or just chokes. Read and learn. I use several of these on all my high-current ESC EDF birds. The MiG has 7 of them. Overkill? Maybe. But how many individual MiGs are flying that have several thousand flights logged w/o a single radio glitch? Here are the locations:

    One small choke near each FFS servo (as close to the MKS HV69 as possible). There's a nice pocket ahead of each servo.
    One larger choke on each ESC mounted as close to the ESC as possible on the battery side.
    The green ferrite ring that comes stock.
    I added another small one near the green ring.
    The SR-10 came with its own.

    Yep...that's a total of 7 chokes. Like I said...probably overkill, but the set-up is extremely flight proven.**

    I'm gun shy after crashing an A-10 twice and an F-4 twice from loss of control events which a HAM Radio friend said was likely due to the noise generated by the high-current ESCs. Zero loss of control events since I started using the extra RF chokes on my high-current ESC EDFs.

    -GG

    **Estimated somewhat more than 2500 flights.

    Leave a comment:


  • crxmanpat
    replied
    Motion has said 5.5v max.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luqman Khan
    replied
    Does anyone know what's the voltage range for bluebox that comes installed in mig29? I tried to look around but could not find any official figures.

    Reason I ask (and apologies for long read):

    My stock elevator servos (and the replacement sent by motion) were vibrating big times and after motion sent me a replacement for the originals I didn't even want to go back.... I replaced stock elevator servos with hitec 5245mg (drop-ins) and problem solved (replacements servos are as smooth as it gets).
    While I was trying to figure out elevator vibrations (and before swapping out stock servos) i replaced stock BEC with basic Castle 10amp v1 BEC and set the output voltage to 5.1v but I noticed that caused chattering and (minor) deflections in control surfaces (ailerons, flaps, rudders)... but when I increased the output voltage to 5.3v all chatter/minor vibrations went away and I was even able to do an uneventful maiden today. I am using Spektrum AR637T receiver.

    I'm afraid that I might fry the blue box at 5.3v - anyone knows the real voltage numbers bluebox can support? also, any idea why I would have gotten the servo movements on 5.1v but not with 5.3v?

    Leave a comment:


  • GliderGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by lusek_pl
    Nothing in this model offends me as much as the main gear. How it is solved by Freewing is profanation;). If they had done it from the fuselage and not from the wings, it would have looked better.
    LOL - After several thousand flights on it, the FW MiG-29 remains the favorite of all my birds to fly...scale gear or not.

    This is one well designed "wear tolerant" airframe....no fatigue cracks...nada/zip. Other than the occasional landing gear servo replacement, when one becomes intermittent, or a control servo replacement, when one begins to chatter...she's one tough bird.

    As an update to prior posts, I've made a large number of landings after the replacement of the not-designed-to-be-replaced main gear plastic mounting box...some post-repair landings were not so good. It's holding up extremely well / better than I expected.

    If you missed the details, below is a link to the prior post / how to do it.

    #5186
    Dec 12, 2021, 08:43 PM

    Followed with more info in post 5187

    -GG

    Leave a comment:


  • KevinMar
    replied
    I just wanted to share that I had a dream last night that I owned this Mig-29. That is all

    Leave a comment:

Working...