Official FlightLine F4U-1A Corsair 1600mm (63") Wingspan

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by jetfool
    Elbee,

    Mine weighs 8.5 with your cockpit, struts, tw and Robart wheels. Good luck on first flight. Will be waiting to hear of successiveful flight

    Best Regards, Rex
    Whoa, that's light. Is that dry weight or with battery?

    That only leaves the primer and paint, faux P&W, cowl flap mechanism with micro servo, Canopy mechanism with 2 micro servos, and pilot figure.:grimacing:

    But that weight adds up quickly.:astonished:

    Where is your rudder servo?

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • jetfool
    replied
    Elbee,

    Mine weighs 8.5 with your cockpit, struts, tw and Robart wheels. Good luck on first flight. Will be waiting to hear of successiveful flight

    Best Regards, Rex

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    That seems excessively heavy to me.
    Plane weighs 9.55 lbs dry with the extra OEM weights in the Cowl; an unmodified airframe is 6.3 lbs, a 51% increase over a stock airframe.

    Add the 35c/6250Mah + 6 volt LiFe to run the lights at 2.1 lbs puts her at a chunky 11.5+.at suggested CG versus a <9 lb airframe at CG.

    Considering the heaviest mods, Robart Wheels/Tires, 85% Cockpit with full pilot, Pratt&Whitney faux motor, Main Gear mods, primer & paint I figured she'd beef up some.

    But she's so pretty.

    Best, Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    That seems excessively heavy to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by Elbee
    Evan D davegee

    She weighs in at 11.75 lbs 'wet' with the correct CG of 100mm aft of the LE.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	pngtree-animated-pig-in-helmet-flying small.jpg
Views:	375
Size:	8.3 KB
ID:	411048
    That's 38+ ounces per square foot of wing loading using a trapezoid equation for the wing shape. +/- for the rounded tip (700sq in).

    Feel free to check my math. :flushed:

    I've flown heavier but not at this wingspan.

    Same calculations for OEM equals an 8+lb airframe and 26.3+ oz/sq, roughly 44% lighter :astonished:

    Whoa, this'll be fun.

    Taxi test today in the driveway to avoid any temptation.

    Lighter winds forecasted for tomorrow, so "God willin' and the creek don't rise," first flight test on Sunday somewhere.

    Best, Steve
    Hi Steve: I just weighed my Corsair. With an Admiral 6S inside, the "all up" weight for mine is 9 pounds, 13 ounces, the same weight I have been flying it for years. Add another 5 ounces for the "Authentic Elbee Brewster bomb rack and bomb" that I have flown several times which puts it over 10 pounds.So you're only about a pound and a three quarters more than my standard flying weight, without all the details you have added on yours. I've never had any issues with mine when I've flown it in a scale manner, which I always do.I never attempt any maneuver that the full sized plane would not have tried or was unable to accomplish.

    I don't think you'll have an issue with your plane at your weight provided you don't get too slow in turns or pull too many g's in maneuvers. You should be fine.

    Good Luck!!!

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Evan D davegee

    She weighs in at 11.75 lbs 'wet' with the correct CG of 100mm aft of the LE.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	pngtree-animated-pig-in-helmet-flying small.jpg
Views:	375
Size:	8.3 KB
ID:	411048
    That's 38+ ounces per square foot of wing loading using a trapezoid equation for the wing shape. +/- for the rounded tip (700sq in).

    Feel free to check my math. :flushed:

    I've flown heavier but not at this wingspan.

    Same calculations for OEM equals an 8+lb airframe and 26.3+ oz/sq, roughly 44% lighter :astonished:

    Whoa, this'll be fun.

    Taxi test today in the driveway to avoid any temptation.

    Lighter winds forecasted for tomorrow, so "God willin' and the creek don't rise," first flight test on Sunday somewhere.

    Best, Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    I'm going to say you are okay. You could tape a weight to the front of your battery if worried.
    I agree with Evan. You should be able to tape a little weight onto the battery to ensure it is within CG limits, and give you some comfort knowing that CG won't be an issue with this plane. On my Corsair, I've always just shoved it forward to the stop (Admiral 5000 6S) and it has never been an issue.Of course, I don't have all the wonderful additions that you have added on your plane, but I would think it would be fine with this adjustment to be within the CG envelope.

    With my F/A-18C when flying with the Deluxe Elbee Cockpit, I had to move the battery forward close to an inch to accommodate the additional weight of that cockpit over the stock one. Whatever it takes, there is a way, I'm sure!

    davegee

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    commented on 's reply
    Thanks, Evan. Much appreciated. Best, Steve

  • Evan D
    replied
    I'm going to say you are okay. You could tape a weight to the front of your battery if worried.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Hey Corsair Crew,

    Cable management done, CG is slightly tail heavy (aft) from recommended, say 5mm+tail heavy.

    Is there a problem here at that CG, 105mm+?

    Due to all the mods up front, I have very limited space for more weights, though I will do what needs to be done.

    Suggestions/recommendations.

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Thanks f4u ausie,

    I have always poked a bit of the antenna out of the fuselage, homage to my early RC days of the 'long' antennae.

    I have not had an issue ever before but I had always gone by the diagrams in my Futaba Owners Manual.

    Not going to sweat it, but will do all the range checks, twice.

    Thanks again, Brother.

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    Hi lb hope u r well.. my 2 cents worth, with my minimal years, take it with a grain of salt.... i have used dynam (detrum) radio since day dot.. never had signal loss.... the rx has 2 wires good length.. only use 1 rx (sr86) gyro 8 chanel.. always have (consistancy).. anyway b4 i saw people doing the 90 dgree thing i always did 180 dgree.. left side right side,, but small hole in foam to expose the wire.. most wont want holes and visual eyesores, i get that.. but works 4 me.. point dont no if they need to b 90.... that may or maynot make it easier 4 u.. and as u no i have an f4 that i LOVE ,,and i upgrded to spectrum.. its a single wire ar631 gyro as3x etc. Dx7 buts its also exposed at the top ... dont if any of this helps.. but hope it does,, b safe and heres couple pics Click image for larger version

Name:	17257473819425782734568861883948.jpg
Views:	465
Size:	115.5 KB
ID:	410002 Click image for larger version

Name:	17257475161065130509462221668058.jpg
Views:	444
Size:	110.6 KB
ID:	410003

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Hey Gang,

    Question about RX antenna placement.

    I fly Futaba R2008SB Rx's with duel antennae.

    I have not had a problem with antenna placement with any other airframe, but due to the abundance of extras I have a great deal of wiring, servos, and whatnot with very limited free space to run the antennae at 90o to one another.

    My solution is to split the leads one going one way and down to the fuselage bottom (all good) though the other will run across the fuselage width opposite the Rx body by some length.

    By doing that, the antennae ends are now 6" plus apart, but running at 90o.

    The question: Is this acceptable radio reception procedure, am I good to run these leads this way?

    Any assist is immensely appreciated.

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    Originally posted by Elbee

    DG, I could take out the two (2) extra OEM nose weights, too. Best, LB

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.jpg
Views:	486
Size:	100.5 KB
ID:	409912
    I hadn't thought of that, but Yes, you could do that!! Ha!

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by davegee
    If you need a bit more power, here's a possibility! Maybe a bit large, but it would probably get your airplane into the air!...
    DG, I could take out the two (2) extra OEM nose weights, too. Best, LB

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.jpg
Views:	486
Size:	100.5 KB
ID:	409912

    Leave a comment:


  • davegee
    replied
    If you need a bit more power, here's a possibility! Maybe a bit large, but it would probably get your airplane into the air!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by Elbee
    I was planning on adding a 6 volt RX pack to assist in powering the additional lights.
    Best, LB
    Suggest you just use a 12 V car battery to power all those lights and operating mods.

    Leave a comment:


  • jetfool
    replied
    Sounds like your almost there for the first test ride. Elbee. May the sky gods smile down on you. After 2 years of looking at mine and flying the heck out of sport planes I finally got two test flights on my E-Flite FW-190 and the Corsair is next in line. Plan to add a pilot and your cowl flaps this winter.

    Best Regards, Rex

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by f4u ausie
    Ever inventive steve,, im thinking its a little heavier, with all those exquiset mods,, might b in the air soon😀
    Oh, it is heavier.

    The 'good news' :partying_face: is I was planning on adding a 6 volt RX pack to assist in powering the additional lights.

    So, I think I am going to spot on the recommended C of G with the 2 extra weights.:champagne_glass:

    Fingers crossed. :fingers_crossed:

    Yes, 1st check flight soon. :white_check_mark::pop

    Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • f4u ausie
    replied
    Ever inventive steve,, im thinking its a little heavier, with all those exquiset mods,, might b in the air soon😀

    Leave a comment:

Working...