Originally posted by F106DeltaDart
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What did you fly today?
Collapse
X
-
But... EDFs are just so much more fun at WOT. :pOriginally posted by crxmanpat View PostWow, I'm getting 4 minutes with 25% left. You do know that the left stick moves both up and down? LOLFF gliders and rubber power since 1966, CL 1970-1990, RC since 1975.
current planes from 1/2 oz to 22 lbs
Comment
-
I'm using Admiral 4000s, so that explains a lot. I think I'll have to order some of those for my Tomcat and A-10.Originally posted by crxmanpat View PostI'm using RoaringTop 5800 35Cs and XPS 5200 45Cs. Both of these are great for the F-14 as they are longer and skinnier than most 5000 packs, weigh less than most 5000s, and fit perfectly in the F-14 without any modifications to the battery bay.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Hey Gibbo. I do not own the Mig21 but since you havnt received any advice on the cg looking at the wing configuration i would balance it upside down. The best thing to do though would be to pm xplaneguy or rcjetdude or deltadart or crcmanpat or TI. All of these gentlemen are quite the experts as well as alot l have failed to mention not because they are not experts in edfs but the list is way to long. One will definatly get you on the right path.Dewey l
Comment
-
He got it on another thread ;)Originally posted by Dewey H Lee View PostHey Gibbo. I do not own the Mig21 but since you havnt received any advice on the cg looking at the wing configuration i would balance it upside down. The best thing to do though would be to pm xplaneguy or rcjetdude or deltadart or crcmanpat or TI. All of these gentlemen are quite the experts as well as alot l have failed to mention not because they are not experts in edfs but the list is way to long. One will definatly get you on the right path.
Comment
-
The only reason you would balance right side up verus upside down is to prevent the model from falling off whatever your are using to balance it.Originally posted by GIBBO View PostHi need advice on free wing mig 21 when carrying out centre of gravity test do you have the plane upside down or right way up thanks Paul
Generally low wings stay on the balancer (or your finger tips if you are like me) better upside down. Likewise, high wings do better right side up.
The finger tip method works. My jets generally come off the boards needing ZERO trim.
But as far as Cg is concerned, the Cg doesn't care either way. Find a way to balance the bird that you can do and get repeatable results. I like the finger tip method.
crxman the twins are more efficient.
Meridian Aeromodelers, Meridian MS
Comment
-
Thats what many dont post about their awesome airplanes. I just could not deal w such little time to fly, not so cool after all.Originally posted by F106DeltaDart View Post
It's a good solid flyer. Steady and easy with wings out, and a bullet with the wings swept. The only downside is the flight time. I get about 2.5-3 minutes maximum right now, landing at 15%.
Comment
-
That appears to be on Admiral 4000's. Did you read the later posts as well? Not so bad after all..... I get bored flying something too long. 4 minutes of adrenaline pumping awesome EDF flying and I am ready for a little break. Notice I said little.... ;)Originally posted by crankestein View Post
Thats what many dont post about their awesome airplanes. I just could not deal w such little time to fly, not so cool after all.
Comment
-
I think there is more to it. The center of gravity has both a horizontal and vertical component. The horizontal component is the balance fore and aft (as well as port and starboard). The reason that high wing aircraft are more stable in the air is that most of the weight (CoG) is below the wings. The opposite is true on a low wing where most of the weight is above the wings. That is why low wings are harder to balance right side up. It's like trying to balance an umbrella on the tip of your finger. It can be done but it's a trick o do it. A lot easier to hold it from above and let it swing until it becomes stable. At least that is how it was explained to me and it makes sense.Originally posted by seaviper View Post
The only reason you would balance right side up verus upside down is to prevent the model from falling off whatever your are using to balance it.
Generally low wings stay on the balancer (or your finger tips if you are like me) better upside down. Likewise, high wings do better right side up.
The finger tip method works. My jets generally come off the boards needing ZERO trim.
But as far as Cg is concerned, the Cg doesn't care either way. Find a way to balance the bird that you can do and get repeatable results. I like the finger tip method.
crxman the twins are more efficient.Aeromaster 35% Extra 260 (under construction), Hanger 9 40 size P51, SIG Somethin' Extra, Hanger 9 40 size Super Stick, Eflite F4U-1A Corsair, Eflite Carbon Z Yak 54, Freewing Panther F9F, 1/5 scale Piper L4 (in box), Addiction XL (in box), Parkzone Super Cub, Eflite UM's F-16, P51, Revolution & Spitfire, Durafly Das Ugly Stick, Twisted Hobbys Crack Yak & Mini Crack Yak, Align T-Rex 600, Motion RC Avanti (under construction)
Comment
-
Extreme power means high demand from the batteries. 3 min is common for EDF models at full throttle.Originally posted by crankestein View Post
Thats what many dont post about their awesome airplanes. I just could not deal w such little time to fly, not so cool after all.
EDF requires 1.5X the watts per lb of aircraft for the same flight performance as the conventional 2 blade prop in the nose (all else being equal... and its not)
The EDF unit itself is a heavier way to mount the motor than the common firewall mounting of a brushless outrunner.
So you are starting with a model that has a weight penalty and a higher power demand. Then we demand that the EDF models fly faster than the conventional prop models, being less than happy with any EDF model that can't exceed 100 mph.
Then lets add that heavy swing wing system to the F-14.
You have the choice at this point of adding a LOT of battery weight to get duration (thus losing maneuverability and increasing minimum speed to maintain controlled flight) or accepting reduced flight time.
Even accepting the appx 3 min average flight time, the Freewing F-14 is a heavy aircraft, requiring a long runway.
The actual mini-turbine powered models suffer similarly from the weight and power requirements to get the performance desired. Those tiny turbines can burn a gallon of kerosene in under 12 minutes (some burn a lot more). Most can't carry more than 4 minutes of full throttle fuel.FF gliders and rubber power since 1966, CL 1970-1990, RC since 1975.
current planes from 1/2 oz to 22 lbs
- Likes 1
Comment
-
DD........I really like the redo on your Razor after the frontal explosion rebuild. :Cool:It's inspiring me to freshen mine up.;)Originally posted by F106DeltaDart View PostHad a great day at the field today, no wind to speak of and 4 hours of fun flying. Brought out the whole lineup, and got 2 flights on each bird and back in time for Turkey!Warbird Charlie
HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190
Comment
-
I got to go flying today with George Baker and some others at JCRC. Brought out the Stinger 90, 90mm A-10, Stinkbug, 70mm Bae Hawk and SU-47.
After a 6 minute flight on my Hawk, this is what was left and the battery was barely warm. RT 5800 35C.
But at the end of the day there was one casualty.... after picking up the pieces there wasn't a single blade left on the fans I have never seen anything like it before. At the end of the runway at lift off it just went crazy. Flew fine the last time it was up and the only thing I did to it was fix the canards so they could not move. Ah well... if you are gonna fly 'em you are gonna crash 'em. She was a perty ship...
Comment











Comment