OK, in the spirit of helping, here is a picture of the tailpipe of the SR-71 at the SAC museum in Nebraska, that you can use as a reference for color matching. The nozzle was made of Hastelloy X (a nickel alloy), which suffers minor surface discoloration due to the high temperature of the jet exhaust.
This SR-71 looks grey even on the outside in this picture... I think the exposure is not very good and much too bright. Because even with real jets without bright interior lighting and incorrect image exposure, the inside looks black, except for the rearmost slats of the nozzle outlets with the coatings... but inside a "cave" has always been black. ;-)
I don't really care... I like black and I'll keep doing it like that. But with the SR-71 from Freewing I'm pretty sure I'll install an afterburner, then I can even imagine aluminum foil in the innermost part, but not all the way to the back, it has to be black there for me, that's perfect for me.
I'm a major "scale" guy and I think your black thrust tubes look great. Light absorption could be an issue if you did choose to add afterburners but I think the black thrust tubes look better than the white stock ones personally.
Thanks, I like that much better than bright and if you don't use the flash of the camera to illuminate the inside of the real jets, it looks black, except for the rearmost slats of the nozzle outlets with the coatings... but the inside of a "cave" has always been black. ;-)
I haven't tried the reverse thrust yet, I was going to use the extra channel for separate nose steering but waiting to get more flights on mine before I do anything else. The chute works way better than I expected but it is a pain to pack if you have big hands and fingers like I do, I use my pinky finger to hold the chute in while closing the hatch and it still wants to pop out. It is a cool factor for sure but very effective. I have tried reverse thrust on other jets and it makes a mess inside the fuselage, I fly off pavement and it gets to dusty and sucks all that into the fan, besides I have plenty of runway so I don't need reverse anyway so the chute works for me. I now have 6 flights on mine and its a very nice flyer so far.
I will…but I will probably use the chute only on occasion. Repacking it every flight might get tiresome. Maybe not. Gotta buy a totally new radio set-up first.
Post build impressions…drum roll please…and I am not affiliated with MRC LOL…here goes…
The quality of this PNP plane is excellent. I did not run into any snags getting her ready. The Admiral 6000 needed to be slid to the aft of the front battery bay to get the CG spot on (gear down). If one were to go with 2 batteries, some tail weight would be needed.
The range check was great. All quadrants. I have yet to taxi her, so I cannot comment on how well the nose gear is centered straight.
I added RF Chokes right at both ESCs on the lines that head back into the fuselage and an additional RF Choke between the UBEC and the RX. There is a green toroid ferrite choke already installed. I added another. RF Chokes are SOOO important to help prevent RF noise from the ESCs from disrupting your receiver.
A majority of the screws are Torx. I liked that! The inner main doors came default to “not scale”. They close after gear extension. I liked that that, too. It gets them out of harms way.
All the factory-installed screws were tight! The gyro was default “normal” (steady green light), and test “flying” in my hands proved that the gyro configuration is correct. There is an App you can download to configure the gyro, should you need to.
With the magnetic nose off, there is ample room in the bed of my Titan. Her right main fit into the tie down for the B-2…nice.
There is a seam line in the tail cone. I lined up the inner control surface with this seam. Then I lined the outer control’s trailing edge to the inner control’s trailing edge. I’m gonna start with about 3-5 mm of “trailing edge up”. Most of my birds require up elevator in cruise.
Rain for the next several days. Ugh.
Overall, I am VERY well pleased with the quality and design features. I’m ready to see how she holds up to her first 1,000 landings.
Next up…pilot flight reports as soon as the weather permits. Not going with any EXPO and will maiden on low rate. 6 ch gear, so no chute, no gyro settings changes, and no reverse thrust. I do plan to upgrade radios, so these other “neat’ features will be enabled soon. Timer is set for 3 minutes, and I will maiden at 50% throttle cruise. I anticipate 4-5 minutes at 50% throttle plus some full power acro (loops) and fast low passes…leaving 3.8V is my goal.
I think I speak for more than myself when I say a less abrasive bedside manner would be warranted and is always appreciated in this forum community.
OK, in the spirit of helping, here is a picture of the tailpipe of the SR-71 at the SAC museum in Nebraska, that you can use as a reference for color matching. The nozzle was made of Hastelloy X (a nickel alloy), which suffers minor surface discoloration due to the high temperature of the jet exhaust.
I'm retired, it's 13 degrees F outside, all my chores are done, all my model winter maintenance is done. I don't watch TV. My "hangar" is full to overflowing. . .
SR-71 Blackbird Twin 70mm EDF Jet With Gyro from Freewing - PNP - FJ32211PG
The Freewing SR-71 Blackbird pays tribute to one of the most legendary aircraft in aviation history. Developed in the 1960s for high-altitude reconnaissance, the SR-71 set records with its unparalleled speed, cutting-edge engineering, and futuristic
"Always" is not the same as ""sometimes"
"Very few" is not the same as "none".
Incidentally, the last several FW models I have bought did not have unfinished white EPO inside the tailpipe. They were painted grey.
I'm a major "scale" guy and I think your black thrust tubes look great. Light absorption could be an issue if you did choose to add afterburners but I think the black thrust tubes look better than the white stock ones personally.
Your model, your choice, but don't pretend it's scale.
Okay, thanks. Let's see if I want to try an "afterburner" after all. Since it reduces the jet power rather than increases it, I'm just not a fan of this whole afterburner thing so far.
Even that statement is disputable, since some designs (but not all) actually do a good job of fairing in the blunt rear end of the motor.
You're right, I think the EPO thrust tubes are ugly, cheap... they look like toys. Black is good for me, I've never used these afterburners in any jets that partially glow when idling, I don't think they're particularly realistic. But as you say, to each his own, they're not real jets.
I'm a major "scale" guy and I think your black thrust tubes look great. Light absorption could be an issue if you did choose to add afterburners but I think the black thrust tubes look better than the white stock ones personally.
Since it can drive two tailpipes independently it would be perfect for this SR-71.
Okay, thanks. Let's see if I want to try an "afterburner" after all. Since it reduces the jet power rather than increases it, I'm just not a fan of this whole afterburner thing so far.
I've never used these afterburners in any jets that partially glow when idling, I don't think they're particularly realistic. But as you say, to each his own, they're not real jets.
There's only one brand that glows while idling (and even there the fix is simple). The good ones do not. You should get out more.
Photos of real jets show otherwise. The pictures I posted were of real F-104, F-14, F-15, F-16, F/A-18, F-35, Mig-29 and SU-35 none of which are black inside. Actual B-1B nozzles below - not black inside either. Jet exhaust stopped being sooty sometime in the 1960s. Afterburners burn off any soot anyway.
But if if floats your boat to paint them black because you like it and think the authentic coloration is ugly, that's your prerogative. They're your models and you can paint them anyway you like.
(Black wouldn't help with any simulated afterburners.)
You're right, I think the EPO thrust tubes are ugly, cheap... they look like toys. Black is good for me, I've never used these afterburners in any jets that partially glow when idling, I don't think they're particularly realistic. But as you say, to each his own, they're not real jets.
Leave a comment: