G'day Grossman56,
I mentioned that fact as by my bush math, the improvement was about 12% from the 540 to the 580 and then only about the same from the 560 to the 650. However, if you go from the 540 to the 650 you are looking at a 25% increase and that is noticeable.
It also helps to fit fresh [read new] batteries when you are doing tests like this.
If you are using batteries that have a bit of age on them, the loss of performance in the batteries could mask any increase in motor performance.
I know that my batteries have lost at least 15 to 20% off their best performance from new. They are at the end of their life span so it would be a waste of time trying to compare motors with old and new batteries if that makes sense to you and the rest.
I am absolutely 100% happy with the performance of the 650 motor on 4s batts.
Is it a rocket ship?
No, but the performance with this set up is more than satisfactory.
What I like about the Mustang is that there is room to improve and modify the model to suit the individual pilot. I like the fact that we can change things to make the models our own and stand out from the pack.
I have put balsa over the turtle deck and made new battery boxes on each of my P-51's. The prevents the dreaded gatoring of the foam.
I have nearly six hundred flights between my three Mustangs and, with some minor parts changes [and a wing set change due to my own fault while not flying, read a car door] these model have been very reliable and flyable in nearly all conditions.
I fitted bronze wheel bearings to stop the e clip from wearing through the wheels.
I just need a lot more runway to stop as the friction rate is so low.
Regards and respect
Daryl
I mentioned that fact as by my bush math, the improvement was about 12% from the 540 to the 580 and then only about the same from the 560 to the 650. However, if you go from the 540 to the 650 you are looking at a 25% increase and that is noticeable.
It also helps to fit fresh [read new] batteries when you are doing tests like this.
If you are using batteries that have a bit of age on them, the loss of performance in the batteries could mask any increase in motor performance.
I know that my batteries have lost at least 15 to 20% off their best performance from new. They are at the end of their life span so it would be a waste of time trying to compare motors with old and new batteries if that makes sense to you and the rest.
I am absolutely 100% happy with the performance of the 650 motor on 4s batts.
Is it a rocket ship?
No, but the performance with this set up is more than satisfactory.
What I like about the Mustang is that there is room to improve and modify the model to suit the individual pilot. I like the fact that we can change things to make the models our own and stand out from the pack.
I have put balsa over the turtle deck and made new battery boxes on each of my P-51's. The prevents the dreaded gatoring of the foam.
I have nearly six hundred flights between my three Mustangs and, with some minor parts changes [and a wing set change due to my own fault while not flying, read a car door] these model have been very reliable and flyable in nearly all conditions.
I fitted bronze wheel bearings to stop the e clip from wearing through the wheels.
I just need a lot more runway to stop as the friction rate is so low.
Regards and respect
Daryl
Comment