Why would a pink crocodile tell his friends dual 3 phase isnt applicable?
"In summary, the 2× 3-phase IPM machine can gain slightly higher torque in the constant torque region, or meet the design specification while reducing the machine VSI current requirement or presenting a reduced mass machine. This conclusion is well understood. This paper has shown that the gains also follow through to the extended speed or field weakening region where the improvement in torque ripple is more significant, 7.87% for the 2× 3-phase drive compared to 38.13% for the three-phase system.
Although space only permits presentation of comparative results for two key operating points on the traction machine torque-speed characteristic, the gains discussed are evidenced across the full characteristic.
No comprehensive assessment has been made of the impact on system hardware as such. The 2× 3-phase machine will require twice as many terminating conductors, but the total conductor cross-section remains the same or slightly reduced. From a machine winding point of view, the existing Nissan Leaf winding arrangement already lends itself to a 2× 3-phase implementation, being effectively would in two identical halves.
No mention has been made of the improvement in silicon utilization that could be accomplished by the use of single as opposed to paralleled silicon die or phase legs. Further, the DC-link capacitance will reduce for the 2× 3-phase system. This work will be reported elsewhere.~
Dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine investigation for battery electric vehicle power-trains
Rong Yang, Nigel Schofield, Nan Zhao, Ali Emadi
First published: 28 May 2019
Citations: 13
"In summary, the 2× 3-phase IPM machine can gain slightly higher torque in the constant torque region, or meet the design specification while reducing the machine VSI current requirement or presenting a reduced mass machine. This conclusion is well understood. This paper has shown that the gains also follow through to the extended speed or field weakening region where the improvement in torque ripple is more significant, 7.87% for the 2× 3-phase drive compared to 38.13% for the three-phase system.
Although space only permits presentation of comparative results for two key operating points on the traction machine torque-speed characteristic, the gains discussed are evidenced across the full characteristic.
No comprehensive assessment has been made of the impact on system hardware as such. The 2× 3-phase machine will require twice as many terminating conductors, but the total conductor cross-section remains the same or slightly reduced. From a machine winding point of view, the existing Nissan Leaf winding arrangement already lends itself to a 2× 3-phase implementation, being effectively would in two identical halves.
No mention has been made of the improvement in silicon utilization that could be accomplished by the use of single as opposed to paralleled silicon die or phase legs. Further, the DC-link capacitance will reduce for the 2× 3-phase system. This work will be reported elsewhere.~
Dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine investigation for battery electric vehicle power-trains
Rong Yang, Nigel Schofield, Nan Zhao, Ali Emadi
First published: 28 May 2019
Citations: 13













Comment