LOL Nothing but high brow, first class name calling here!!! ;):P Have a great day all!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's next from Motion RC?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Oxotnik View Post
And I’m just the opposite. Small warbirds that have flimsy fixed gear is repugnant to me. I rip that gear off and hand-launch, belly-land them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evoman View Post
Size is not much of deterrent for me but no landing gear is. I usually fly at a wide open lot with rocky dirt with light grass surrounded by streets that I use as my runway. So landing a plane with no gear on either would tear it up. Besides I have had enough bad experiences with hand launching that I just avoid it all together. I have a Dynam Hawksky that I use as my warm up plane and I have only ever hand launched a few times. But even though the wire wheels are flimsy and I can only steer it with the rudder when it picks up speed it does a good enough job for me and it really does not bother me. So at the very least a plane has to have fixed wire gear for me to consider it.
But from personal experience, the T-45 can handle a rough runway. The one at my airfield was bad until they resurfaced it a few years ago, but that was when I started.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AirHead View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by Valkpilot View Post
Well, they're two different aircraft. The top one is a AVRO Canada CF-100, which I believe you're talking about. Also called "The Clunk" after a comment made by one of the test pilots during it's first flights, the way the B-52 is called "The BUFF". The lower is a Lockheed T-33.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skyboom View PostI wonder what the clunk noise was? T33 such a cool aircraft. Think their comming out in a turbine model.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by AirHead View Post
Valkpilot once mentioned that the "Clunk" noise was the front landing gear clunking up into the aircraft fuselage. The CF100 was the only aircraft Canada ever made at the time that actually flew in service....Canada gave up building any more military planes after the 50's...
Particularly when your neighbors to the south are determined to spend that money anyway, and you can just decide whether to buy some of the finished product after it's been proven to be worth the investment. :Cool:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hoomi View Post
Definitely not a cheap proposition at best, and if the plane turns out to not live up to the requirements, that's an awful lot of money spent for nothing.
Particularly when your neighbors to the south are determined to spend that money anyway, and you can just decide whether to buy some of the finished product after it's been proven to be worth the investment. :Cool:
destroyed so that AVRO couldn't export it, including what may have been the first "supercruise" jet engine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Valkpilot View Post
Actually, it was the Arrow project that was the last hurrah for AVRO Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Diefenbaker not only cancelled the program for the RCAF, he ordered EVERYTHING involved in the program
destroyed so that AVRO couldn't export it, including what may have been the first "supercruise" jet engine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Valkpilot View Post
No it's two. When discussing it in proper company it's Big Ugly Fat Fellow. Though in the real name coined by aircrews, the second "F" represents a certain expletive which isn't supposed to be used here.:)
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment