FMS 80MM Dassault Rafale

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    It's physics... Or so I've been told.
    With the latest discoveries by CERN (and others) about the new muon particles changing how we view physics, UP will soon become DOWN. Gravity won't be the same anymore. Ours eyes will no longer capture color as they once did. An invisible cape will attract a bull more than a bright red one. Model airplanes will be made to defy the laws of physics far easier than full size ones due to less influence of muons on a smaller body.
    Oh, and Canada and the northern USA will become "down under".

    Leave a comment:


  • SanExup
    replied
    It's about light reflection and absorption, if you watch YouTube videos of the real jets, you'll notice the colorful ones all fly way better than than the grey ones, so it's for better performance. That's why Ferraris and Ducatis are red.

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    It's physics... Or so I've been told.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    It's physics... Or so I've been told.

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by kallend

    Whatever floats your boat. I have enough plain grey planes already.

    Airshow schemes are designed to be seen, not designed to be hard to see.
    Wow, I didn't know air show schemes were meant to be seen, learn something new every day...:face_with_hand_over

    So that's why the Blue Angels is a beautiful blue and bright yellow, and the T-Birds a gloss white with bright red/blue..​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    Originally posted by DCORSAIR

    Looks nice, makes you wonder who was thinking that more people were going to like that stock ugly yellow scheme over a real front line fighter scheme...
    Whatever floats your boat. I have enough plain grey planes already.

    Airshow schemes are designed to be seen, not designed to be hard to see.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    I've all but fallen off the fence on this one. Might be a slim chance I'll reconsider when summer gets here and I get rid of a couple more planes. However, on the subject of the paint scheme, I prefer the bright colored ones. If I had the same, drab, military grey color on all my modern EDFs, I would have a hard time seeing the difference when I walk into the hanger. It would be wall to wall (ceiling to ceiling) grey - pretty boring. Then there's the visibility thing when flying them. If I was in the real thing in a combat mission, trying to hide from the bad guys, that's a different story. I have a few military grey planes at the moment and that's a few too many. I won't buy any more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Same person that did the Arrows twin 64 F-15!

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Flanker271
    I just can't stand the factory paint scheme so ended up repainting mine. I want my war-birds to represent front line fighters, not some airshow plane. Spent the better part of the afternoon painting panel lines. For base gray I used Tamiya gray surface primer spray can. Panel lines are done with Tamiya acrylic flat black. Still WIP.

    I really wish MRC can bring back the original Mirage 2000 without the Tiger Meet.
    Looks nice, makes you wonder who was thinking that more people were going to like that stock ugly yellow scheme over a real front line fighter scheme...

    Leave a comment:


  • Flanker271
    replied
    I just can't stand the factory paint scheme so ended up repainting mine. I want my war-birds to represent front line fighters, not some airshow plane. Spent the better part of the afternoon painting panel lines. For base gray I used Tamiya gray surface primer spray can. Panel lines are done with Tamiya acrylic flat black. Still WIP.

    I really wish MRC can bring back the original Mirage 2000 without the Tiger Meet.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • RudyD54
    replied
    Well I finally got around to uploading the video of my maiden flight off our grass field. She's definitely not the fastest in my fleet, but she's by far the most relaxing to fly. I was able to get 3 flights on her before the winds began gusting to 30mph and a torrential downpour came through. I got 3:15 on a 4500mah SMC lipo which I may be able to extend a bit more as a become more used to it and I get the CG shifted further back to shorten the take-off run. Setup was as easy as I could ask for using a Spektrum AR637t. Once I get my setup perfected I'll go ahead and post it.


    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by Icarus the 2nd
    Here's probably the world's first vid of the new FMS Rafale 80mm EDF flying on real grass runway !!!

    Enjoy the vid

    If RudyD54 would get on the ball, he'd upload his flight video of his FMS Rafale also flying off of grass recently. I know it did, I saw it!!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20210401_122902.jpg
Views:	1271
Size:	259.5 KB
ID:	307119

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogo
    replied
    Some in-flight fueling footage, starts around 1:30

    Tom

    Leave a comment:


  • Icarus the 2nd
    replied
    Here's probably the world's first vid of the new FMS Rafale 80mm EDF flying on real grass runway !!!

    Enjoy the vid

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    LIVE flight demo on FB

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    ^

    Leave a comment:


  • JLambCWU
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper
    @JLambCWU My dipomacy (or lack thereof) is not always well received over on that "other" forum so I'll say it here. Yours is the "REAL" review that we've been missing till now, so thanks for all this. So far, it's only been infomercials to sell product (or at the very least, to NOT lose sales). Your review says things that "reviewers" don't dare say in an infomercial for fear of losing sales. Where you issued CAUTIONS, we've only seen a long pause before the next video and the words "tweaks" added to the monologue.
    The "flaps" on this plane (or crow in reality) aren't really flaps but as you already said ...................... "speedbrakes" (something I would prefer to use after touchdown). Actual flaps on a delta would simply make the thing take a nose dive into the dirt if nothing else is done. We all know that the mixing board does the crow for you, but in your last picture of the flaps menu, you show % for ELE compensation. Does this mean that the outer "elevators" can be adjusted for different deflections by the user for each "flap" setting?
    The flap deflection and trim are indeed controlled by the numbers you set in for “flaps.” The confusion of what they technically are and how they function/we control them especially on Spektrum, led me to write it how I did. So I did my best to try to not confuse people with words.

    Changing the flap settings elevator compensation controls how much the outer elevon deflects up.
    Also the outer elevon and canard reflect how much elevator compensation you add. This of course needs to be a positive or UP elevator compensation.

    (Corrected after reading my previous explanation.
    The mid and full “flap” values are set by the board but you can change the outer elevon and canard with the elevator compensation.) On Spektrum.

    I started with a previous aircraft configuration I had saved and then tweaked them to what looked about right to me for the maiden. I found that i initially had a tad too much elevator compensation as I was holding down elevator with them deployed at full to descend without slowing too much. It looks really scale in the air at my current settings and takes minimal pitch inputs once on glideslope with them where I posted the settings. Mainly just power for glideslope control now, much like the real jets I fly. Again this is affect by CG and I was flying around 125mm with 4000-5500mah RTs, it was difficultly to get that aft with Admiral 6000 HDs as they wouldn’t go quite as far back.

    I appreciate the diplomacy. We can agree to disagree at times. I spend a fair amount of coin and always post my actual findings. So when I say the 70C 4400mah RT is the sweet spot, I truly mean it. 3:30 was mixed flying on a 5500 and you get around 3:00 with a 4400mah. Of course if you’re out doing a power show, or dragging it around the pattern with the “flaps” out, adjust accordingly.
    All about bettering the hobby right?

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by JLambCWU
    with a Roaring Top 5000mah 70C pushed all the way back, she flew perfectly. Flight time was 3:30 with 3.7v/cell.
    I can live with 3:30. The first couple of videos indicated around 2:20 flight time. That, among other things, was a real downer. I may revisit this plane later this summer. That will give time for more "reveals" to come along, like this ..........................................
    One QA thing on his and another friends is the inner hinge on both flaps is loose and you can move the surface fore and aft a good 2-3mm. It's not a glue thing, it looks like the holes in the flap that the pins/ balls on the hinge are supposed to go into are way too big.
    For now, it's been replaced with the new Draco. HH didn't lose anything in terms of overall sales from me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    When I set one up last night I found that flaps settings responded basically to off, half and full. The owner initially had 0-50-100 for flaps and brought it to me since he couldn't get a no flaps position. He had thought he was on a new fresh model in his radio but had used a prior model with subtrims, some odd travels and the above flap set points. once I zero'ed out everything and made the flaps -100 0 +100 (no elevator numbers in the flap screen) and readjusted the wings push rods everything worked as it should.

    To me it almost seemed like the mixer has specific set points and tries to make it fool proof. I like how it worked. My only concern is that to me it looked like there was no way to have different pitch trim with the flap settings but maybe that's what J was able to achieve.

    I really like the look of the plane, especially the curves under the fuselage at the intakes. The top decals are not water slides, they are printed vinyl. The landing gear is really nice with bearing'ed wheels. My biggest gripe is that of a lot of FMS/ EFlite planes with the hard plastic ball links. I also don't like the little sheet metal screws that hold them to the flap control horns.

    I like how you can remove the one screw that hold the tray the mixing board is mounted to and pull it out to check it. It would also be a good spot to place a separate gyro if you need a spot.

    One QA thing on his and another friends is the inner hinge on both flaps is loose and you can move the surface fore and aft a good 2-3mm. It's not a glue thing, it looks like the holes in the flap that the pins/ balls on the hinge are supposed to go into are way too big.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    @JLambCWU My dipomacy (or lack thereof) is not always well received over on that "other" forum so I'll say it here. Yours is the "REAL" review that we've been missing till now, so thanks for all this. So far, it's only been infomercials to sell product (or at the very least, to NOT lose sales). Your review says things that "reviewers" don't dare say in an infomercial for fear of losing sales. Where you issued CAUTIONS, we've only seen a long pause before the next video and the words "tweaks" added to the monologue.
    The "flaps" on this plane (or crow in reality) aren't really flaps but as you already said ...................... "speedbrakes" (something I would prefer to use after touchdown). Actual flaps on a delta would simply make the thing take a nose dive into the dirt if nothing else is done. We all know that the mixing board does the crow for you, but in your last picture of the flaps menu, you show % for ELE compensation. Does this mean that the outer "elevators" can be adjusted for different deflections by the user for each "flap" setting?

    Leave a comment:

Working...