When you look at this it doesnt seem that much speed wise, but then again its not really in perspective because its not in real life. i think motionrc would not just say random stuff like it is way faster in 6s.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Freewing 90mm F-16 V2 EDF Jet Thread
Collapse
X
-
The V1 with a modern 6S fan and good batteries flies very well and I expect my V2 8S to do the same. Should be faster than my other 90mm FW EDFs except the Zeus and maybe my JetFan powered F/A18C. The Eurofighter and J-10 as deltas have pretty high drag. Probably close to the F-22. My F-4 even with a 8S JetFan is not super fast.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I guess the F-16 V2 has enough power to start from gras, maybe even longer gras. I guess the height from the front gear door will be enough for taking off from gras.
But what about landing on gras? Will the plane emmediately drop on the nose due to the resistance of gras after touch down? I had these problems with the 70mm F-16 V2. That is the only concern that keeps me from ordering.
Comment
-
You know what I'm going to ask, based on the videos I post up. How does the canopy compare to the old v1 in clarity? Man the v1 canopy was second to none for absolute perfection out of the box for fpv use.Originally posted by Aros View PostGood question, I am sure someone in the forum can answer. Plenty of stat junkies out there. This is actually going to be my first 8S 90mm EDF Jet. I've always flown 6S. It will be fascinating to see what difference I can tell when the time comes.
Comment
-
The V1 was underpowered based on most posts in different threads. The landing gear also needed beefing up. Basically what was improved were considered shortfalls of the V1. Considering when the jet came out it was great for its time, only after all the improvements in EDF did the shortfalls become more noticeable.
Comment
-
Noted and agreed. I bought mine almost 10 years ago and as I’ve said in multiple threads it was under powered and had a high wing loading. Even upgrading to the inrunner available then batteries were heavy and battery space limited. I fly off pavement and never had a issue with the gear on the V1. The F-104 had the same gear and I did break the plastic mounting on it (still have that gear set in a drawer). The V2 looks to have the same plastic mount.
the V2 may be even heavier loaded, smaller wing and heavier by the specs… at least we have better fans and batteries now.
Comment
-
I don't disagree. I regret being simplistic in my statement. I fully expect this model to come in at a higher speed and perhaps have a higher stall speed. You're correct, more power isn't an end all solution to a high wing-loaded model. But I stand by my statement...It does help. It most certainly does not hurt.Originally posted by Evan D View PostThe V2 has a smaller wing span and is heavier by the published numbers. That means the V2 will probably land faster than the V1 and probably have a higher stall speed.
More power may help overcome some issues caused by higher loading but I expect that higher power will really cause more crashes because more power really has a tendency to get you in trouble when you are stalling. Having airbrakes and reverse thrust will be a bigger plus landing than overall thrust for this plane.
All my opinion of course. And yes, I ordered one first thing yesterday.My YouTube RC videos:
https://www.youtube.com/@toddbreda
Comment
-
Agree with all of that! I still have my V1 and fly it quite often, especially after converting it to 8S earlier this year. A huge difference from 6S. Flies on a SMC 8S HiV 5900, weighing 900gr giving me almost 5 minutes of flight time. So much better than on 6S, especially being on grass (the kind you mow, not blow-although that might help me relax). 🤯Originally posted by handyman220 View PostThe V1 was underpowered based on most posts in different threads. The landing gear also needed beefing up. Basically what was improved were considered shortfalls of the V1. Considering when the jet came out it was great for its time, only after all the improvements in EDF did the shortfalls become more noticeable.
I'll eventually get the V2, always loved the F16, but will absolutely get it in 8S. And the Spektrum RX upgrade to "plus" has made a huge difference. Also turned my F18's from an adventure in flying to incredibly rock solid and a breeze to land perfectly every time (something I've never been able to do before).
Hugh "Wildman" Wiedman
Hangar: EDF's: Mig 29 TV "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, SU-27 90mm 8S:F22 Red Lion/EuroFighterBronzeTiger/F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet/F16/F4 Jolly Rodgers & Blue Angel, 80&90 TV Avanti, Viper, Stinger 90. Props: 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, B-24, 1700 P-51, 60" Beast & P2 Bipe, Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 62" Extra 300, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, 62" Edge
- Likes 2
Comment
-
With this new"Plus" upgrade to the Spectrum receivers, can you use all of it's features and benefits even if you pair it with a non-Spektrum ESC and a RadioMaster TX16s transmitter? Or do the Spectrum "Plus" receivers require a Spectrum ESC and Spectrum transmitter to take full advantage of all it's functions ?Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post
The Spektrum RX upgrade to "plus" has made a huge difference. Also turned my F18's from an adventure in flying to incredibly rock solid and a breeze to land perfectly every time.:
Comment








Comment