Good job! She can bite with her heavy wing load but if you get her figured out, especially landing profile, she will reward you with awesome sorties!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Freewing 90mm F-16 Falcon Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cape Jets View PostAfter 2 years as my prize hanger queen my 90mm F-16 Thunderbird had her maiden flight. Was nerve racking on first flight till I got her dialed in with some trims. 2nd & 3rd flights she was on point and flew great. Wondering why it took me so long to get her in the air? Only been flying a couple years so wanted to get my landings down on these big jets. She has a 8s FMS 1500Kv EDF, Spectrum AR8360T receiver, Castle Creations 130amp ESC and Hitec D85MG servos for the elevators. Have some mixes added in , but will wait to try them out.
Flying weather is finally here on Cape Cod so the birds are in the air where they belong....Hugh "Wildman" Wiedman
Hangar: FL/FW: Mig 29 "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet, F16 Wild Weasel, F4 Phantom & Blue Angel, 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, Olive B-24, Stinger 90, Red Avanti. Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 60" Extra 300 V2, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, MXS Green, & Demonstrator. FMS-1700mm P-51, Red Bull Corsair. E-Flite-70mm twin SU-30, Beast Bi-Plane 60", P2 Bi-Plane, P-51.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eric Gottwald View Post
Dear Hugh,
very well said👍. Have fun with the new CG😉.
after I have flown my F-16 with a CG of 115 mm (without flaps and/or tailerons), I didn't notice any much better landing behaviour and the first flight ended up with a broken main gear suspension. However, for the next flight I programmed tailerons and flaps and it landed much smoother and easier. The next flight will be with flaperons and usual elevators. We will see what works best 😉. Did you fly yours with the 115 mm CG meanwhile?
Best, Eric
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eric Gottwald View Post
Dear Hugh,
after I have flown my F-16 with a CG of 115 mm (without flaps and/or tailerons), I didn't notice any much better landing behaviour and the first flight ended up with a broken main gear suspension. However, for the next flight I programmed tailerons and flaps and it landed much smoother and easier. The next flight will be with flaperons and usual elevators. We will see what works best 😉. Did you fly yours with the 115 mm CG meanwhile?
Best, Eric
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DCORSAIR View Post
I know your asking Hugh but I thought I would jump in, I have owned and flown 6 of these F-16's and I found 118-120mm to be the sweet spot for getting a good landing, 115mm is a bit much nose heavy but I did use that measurement for awhile when I bought my first one and flew it, then I worked my way back as I got used to it, I never used flaps so I can't say anything on that, my buddy installed a gyro in his F-16 after having trouble landing, I did fly his with a gyro and it does help on landings but I never installed one in my jets, just lots and lots of practice landings...
Comment
-
Eric,
I'm still flying mine balanced between 122-125mm. Tried it at 115mm and like DCORSAIR, found it too nose heavy. I'm now using a slightly lighter battery, the new SMC HiV 5900 which weighs only 740 gr, vs the SMC HiV 6200 I was using at 840 gr. Actually get more flight time and it seems to fly much more nimble (if that's even a thing). Actually now using that 5900 in almost all my EDF's, Mig/F4/F18/A-10 etc. I love it! Additionally, I've found that I still have to keep a little power on when landing with the nose up, in fact give it a little bump in throttle just before the mains touch to get the landing right, unlike other military jets I have (like the Mig/F4/A10).
BTW, your F16 is outstanding, love the job you did on it. Makes me want to get another and copy you.Hugh "Wildman" Wiedman
Hangar: FL/FW: Mig 29 "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet, F16 Wild Weasel, F4 Phantom & Blue Angel, 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, Olive B-24, Stinger 90, Red Avanti. Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 60" Extra 300 V2, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, MXS Green, & Demonstrator. FMS-1700mm P-51, Red Bull Corsair. E-Flite-70mm twin SU-30, Beast Bi-Plane 60", P2 Bi-Plane, P-51.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eric Gottwald View Post
Dear DCORSAIR, thx for your post. As you said: one will need lots and lots of landing practice. However, there must be a reason for this! The E-Flite F-16 is landing so easily, what is different compared to the Freewing one? I haven't worked it out yet but I know as sure as hell that I will not buy 7 ones to practice it😝. BTW: I painted my first one in the Belgian Air Component Solo Display Team like yours in the AVATAR picture. This is one of the best air show liveries ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View PostEric,
I'm still flying mine balanced between 122-125mm. Tried it at 115mm and like DCORSAIR, found it too nose heavy. I'm now using a slightly lighter battery, the new SMC HiV 5900 which weighs only 740 gr, vs the SMC HiV 6200 I was using at 840 gr. Actually get more flight time and it seems to fly much more nimble (if that's even a thing). Actually now using that 5900 in almost all my EDF's, Mig/F4/F18/A-10 etc. I love it! Additionally, I've found that I still have to keep a little power on when landing with the nose up, in fact give it a little bump in throttle just before the mains touch to get the landing right, unlike other military jets I have (like the Mig/F4/A10).
BTW, your F16 is outstanding, love the job you did on it. Makes me want to get another and copy you.
Oh, you're flying larger batteries, I am flying mine with just 5000 mAh packs which is why you would move the CG backwards. However, your packs are interesting since they are obviously much lighter compared to mine. However, I with the X-Tiger I hope I get used to the landings this time. And: thx for the flowers regarding the Belgian Air Component Solo Display Team livery F-16. 🤙
Comment
-
The weight or size of your battery does not change where you should have your CG. I may change the placement of the battery within the aircraft to achieve the CG.
Originally posted by Eric Gottwald View Post
Dear Hugh,
Oh, you're flying larger batteries, I am flying mine with just 5000 mAh packs which is why you would move the CG backwards. However, your packs are interesting since they are obviously much lighter compared to mine. However, I with the X-Tiger I hope I get used to the landings this time. And: thx for the flowers regarding the Belgian Air Component Solo Display Team livery F-16. 🤙
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan D View PostThe weight or size of your battery does not change where you should have your CG. I may change the placement of the battery within the aircraft to achieve the CG.
Comment
-
Heres the new fpv setup for my 90mm f16. You can tell the vacuum effect on the altimeter from the edf. Im working on ways to fix that. Otherwise enjoy the flight! The upgrades include the HUD, auto flaparons activated by airspeed, and full elevon flying tail as well as auto trim to 1g.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by rifleman_btx View PostHeres the new fpv setup for my 90mm f16. You can tell the vacuum effect on the altimeter from the edf. Im working on ways to fix that. Otherwise enjoy the flight! The upgrades include the HUD, auto flaparons activated by airspeed, and full elevon flying tai as well as auto trim to 1g.I solemnly swear to "over-celebrate" the smallest of victories.~Lucky B*st*rd~
You'll never be good at something unless you're willing to suck at it first.~Anonymous~
AMA#116446
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment