Roban - World Class Scale Helicopters

Official FlightLine RC 1600mm P-38 Lightning Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Oxotnik
    Actung, Spitfire!

    • Mar 2016
    • 931
    • Huntsville, AL
    • Send PM

    #3041
    The upgrade struts are awesome. I fly on grass and the MRC upgrade struts are great on a grass field. I love them.
    ---
    Warbirder

    Comment

    • Lon
      HobbySquawk Accomplished Pilot

      • Jul 2014
      • 1201
      • Miles, Iowa
      • Send PM

      #3042
      Originally posted by dkalwishky
      Since I own both sets of struts I've thought about using the RC Castle on the mains and the MRC set on the nose.

      Anyone else doing that?
      I own and have many flights on both the RC Castle and FL struts. With my experience, the FL upgrade struts are alot stronger/better than the Castle.
      Lon

      EFlite F-16 80mm, EFite DRACO, EFlite Night Radian, E-Flite P51 1.5m
      Freewing A-10 80mm, F-86 80mm, F-15 90mm, F-16 90mm. Avanti. FMS DHC-2 Beaver, Fliteline P-38L ,HSD HME-262, HSD F86.

      Comment

      • TiredIronGRB
        Post-Apocalyptic Tactical Consultant

        • Jan 2016
        • 3986
        • Church Hill, Tennessee
        • Send PM

        #3043
        Originally posted by OV10

        Make it 97% LOL for us modders that used the FMS 1400 P-51 port main gear on the nose and the FMS 1400 P-40B gear on the mains.
        And the Freewing P-51 struts...which were the first to be adapted ;)
        TiredIron Aviation
        Tired Iron Military Vehicles

        Comment

        • downwindleg
          Hobby Squawk intermediate pilot

          • Apr 2016
          • 1279
          • Friday Harbor, Washington
          • Send PM

          #3044
          Originally posted by dkalwishky
          Since I own both sets of struts I've thought about using the RC Castle on the mains and the MRC set on the nose.

          Anyone else doing that?
          Yeah dkalwishky, that's exactly what I do. It looks and acts great, especially on an uneven field. Often thought about grinding down that offset fork to make it rounder on the corners and more scale looking but haven't yet. I was surprised that the MRC main struts were lacking the scissor detail......especially as an upgrade! Every body has an opinion on this but I think the "price point" gets in the way of scale quality sometimes....I'm actually sick of hearing that word!!!!!! No offense toward my friends at MRC...they can't please everyone, Brad

          Comment

          • Wesnc

            • Dec 2016
            • 52
            • Orange NSW Australia
            • Send PM

            #3045
            Quick question guys.....I am about to invest in some good batteries and am trying to get my hangar/Lipo strategy sorted. I have the FL p-38,Tigercat & am waiting to hit order on the 1600mm spitfire. Can I run a 6s battery in the twins with a parallel adapter? That way I have a suite of 6s batteries I can use in any of the planes.

            Comment

            • TiredIronGRB
              Post-Apocalyptic Tactical Consultant

              • Jan 2016
              • 3986
              • Church Hill, Tennessee
              • Send PM

              #3046
              Originally posted by Wesnc
              Quick question guys.....I am about to invest in some good batteries and am trying to get my hangar/Lipo strategy sorted. I have the FL p-38,Tigercat & am waiting to hit order on the 1600mm spitfire. Can I run a 6s battery in the twins with a parallel adapter? That way I have a suite of 6s batteries I can use in any of the planes.
              No, 6S would be too much on the P-38 and F7F ESCs.
              TiredIron Aviation
              Tired Iron Military Vehicles

              Comment

              • pmisuinas
                Member

                • Mar 2016
                • 35
                • Send PM

                #3047
                Not so for the P-38 per the rcg thread. Just need to prop it accordingly, see these posts: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=5978



                He didn't change the ESCs, but did go to a MAS 11x7x3 prop, and he stated overall current went down....

                Comment

                • TiredIronGRB
                  Post-Apocalyptic Tactical Consultant

                  • Jan 2016
                  • 3986
                  • Church Hill, Tennessee
                  • Send PM

                  #3048
                  Originally posted by pmisuinas
                  Not so for the P-38 per the rcg thread. Just need to prop it accordingly, see these posts: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=5978



                  He didn't change the ESCs, but did go to a MAS 11x7x3 prop, and he stated overall current went down....
                  I'm referring to the stock configuration...
                  TiredIron Aviation
                  Tired Iron Military Vehicles

                  Comment

                  • OV10
                    >>>Twins are 2X the Fun<<< (Squawk Moderator)

                    • Sep 2014
                    • 4264
                    • Owego, NY
                    • Send PM

                    #3049
                    Originally posted by pmisuinas
                    Not so for the P-38 per the rcg thread. Just need to prop it accordingly, see these posts: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=5978

                    https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=6496

                    He didn't change the ESCs, but did go to a MAS 11x7x3 prop, and he stated overall current went down....
                    I respectfully have to disagree and backup TiredIron's affirmation that 6S is way too much for the stock 3748-600kV motor on the P-38 as well as the F7F.
                    Your reference to the Dec2016 and Mar2017 postings by only one individual(smdub on RCG) where no concrete math evidence is presented to support the ability of this motor being able to handle the amperages is not a strong recommendation for using a 6S configuration on this model.
                    First it would be nice if FlightLine had published it's motor specs but since there are none one can only speculate what it can handle.
                    In speculation, if one where to use a comparable 600kV motor with known specs like the FMS 3648-600kV which has a max amperage rating of 48A with a max voltage of 18V, it is an easy conclusion that the FlightLine can't support the 6S power system. To further that conclusion, a 3648 can sized motor doesn't have the physical mass to dissipate the heat that would be generated.
                    Power requirements are exponential when dealing with voltage increases versus prop diameter/pitch/blade count.
                    That stock motor on 4S nominal voltage of 16V(4v per cell) per the math would be turning 9600 RPM whereas on 6S nominal voltage of 24V would be 14400 RPM
                    As I mentioned, the exponential rise of power required to turn the stock prop is considerably more than the ESC and motor can handle safely on 6S.
                    As you mention that in the posting you reference of smdub, he indicated he used a 1 inch smaller prop diameter MAS 11x7x3 which is a help towards achieving the goal of using 6S but is still highly questionable.
                    So in summary, just because one individual may have had questionable success does not mean that it would be a reliable recommendation to the masses.
                    Best regards,
                    Warbird Charlie
                    HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190

                    Comment

                    • pmisuinas
                      Member

                      • Mar 2016
                      • 35
                      • Send PM

                      #3050
                      Rather than "concrete math evidence", what is better is actual recorded data. smdub did some measurements and posted the data here: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=5893

                      My earlier post was to indicate 6S seemed viable, with the thought others would search the thread for more info if interested. As indicated by actual measurement (given that smdub knows what he is doing), since the 11x7x3 MAS prop draws less current on 6S than the original prop on 4S, I think it is not unreasonable at all to believe the motor can handle it. In addition, if you check the thread, there are at least 3 people reporting success on 6S, although one did indeed indicate the motors were a bit hot using the FW props.

                      Besides, doesn't any recommendation to the masses start out as one individual having "questionable" success? Pete M

                      Comment

                      • downwindleg
                        Hobby Squawk intermediate pilot

                        • Apr 2016
                        • 1279
                        • Friday Harbor, Washington
                        • Send PM

                        #3051
                        Originally posted by Wesnc
                        Quick question guys.....I am about to invest in some good batteries and am trying to get my hangar/Lipo strategy sorted. I have the FL p-38,Tigercat & am waiting to hit order on the 1600mm spitfire. Can I run a 6s battery in the twins with a parallel adapter? That way I have a suite of 6s batteries I can use in any of the planes.
                        I'd say just buy the 4s batteries.......it'd be great if you could run all your planes on 6s but IMHO it is not worth reinventing the wheel or prop when you already have a well established power/prop combination. Also, the increased weight of those 6s bricks would be a big problem. You could compensate by lowering the mah but then you've defeated the purpose of changing to 6s. Brad

                        Comment

                        • WW2rcpilot
                          Expert Crasher

                          • Apr 2017
                          • 19
                          • Kempton, PA
                          • Send PM

                          #3052
                          Just got back from Joe Nall with mine, absolutly awesome flyer and their golf green field was perfect for this baby.Will post some pics later.

                          Comment

                          • OV10
                            >>>Twins are 2X the Fun<<< (Squawk Moderator)

                            • Sep 2014
                            • 4264
                            • Owego, NY
                            • Send PM

                            #3053
                            pmisuinas,
                            Again to TiredIrons comment of "stock setup". Did you not notice that he did not test the stock 12x7x3 prop on 6S for pull and amp.
                            I have been doing this a long time too and have an electrical engineering background and can say that the 'stock' motor with 'stock' prop will not handle 6S.
                            Yes recommendations to the masses are good as long as the results are sound and not hazardous.
                            In the case of Wesnc asking if he can use 6S the answer would be NO for a stock configuration.
                            Best regards,
                            Warbird Charlie
                            HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190

                            Comment

                            • Wesnc

                              • Dec 2016
                              • 52
                              • Orange NSW Australia
                              • Send PM

                              #3054
                              Thanks Guys, I appreciate your help :Cool:

                              Comment

                              • miatateer
                                Hobby Squawk Student Pilot

                                • Dec 2016
                                • 33
                                • Fredericksburg, VA
                                • Send PM

                                #3055
                                FWIW: Strut upgrade back in stock at motion :Cool:

                                Comment

                                • pmisuinas
                                  Member

                                  • Mar 2016
                                  • 35
                                  • Send PM

                                  #3056
                                  OV10,
                                  Yes, I did notice he did not test the stock setup with 6S, probably because he knew it wouldn't take it. But my initial response was to address TiredIron's comment "6S would be too much on the P-38 and F7F ESCs". The P-38 ESC can handle 6S, which is what I said. I also stated the prop was changed to allow that operation. TI's comment did not have a qualifier on it (i.e., in stock configuration), that came later--and if it had been in the first post, I would have completely agreed with it, but would have still noted the ESC can indeed handle 6S. Likewise, your comment the stock motor can't handle 6S is not completely correct, unless you add the caveat "with the stock prop", which again, I agree with. But prop down, and the motor certainly can take 6S, as smdub has demonstrated (and measured). Oversimplifying to one line, it's not the voltage that kills, it's the current...

                                  So yes, I agree the answer is NO for the stock configuration, but again, my comment was strictly focused on "can the ESC handle 6S", and while you may think the "in a totally stock configuration" was clearly implied, it wasn't to me--my brain was in engineering detail mode when I replied. I took it as a comment on whether the ESC was capable of working with a 6S battery, and it is--not always the case as other models designed to fly on 4S could very well have a ESC that would smoke on 6S.

                                  And I too have an electrical engineering background and experience (I have a bachelor's and master's in EE), as well as my years of flying electrics like you and so many others. So in my opinion, the better response to Wesnc is "NO, you cannot use 6S for a stock configuration, but YES, you can use 6S if you adjust accordingly (in this case, go to a smaller prop)."

                                  All of us saying the same thing, only in different ways :-) Pete M

                                  Comment

                                  • Aros
                                    Lead Adminstrator / Warbirdaholic

                                    • May 2013
                                    • 8211
                                    • Astoria, OR
                                    • Send PM

                                    #3057
                                    Nice clarification pmisuinas and good job everyone for keeping the debate from turning sideways. :Cool:
                                    My YouTube RC videos:
                                    https://www.youtube.com/@toddbreda

                                    Comment

                                    • OV10
                                      >>>Twins are 2X the Fun<<< (Squawk Moderator)

                                      • Sep 2014
                                      • 4264
                                      • Owego, NY
                                      • Send PM

                                      #3058
                                      Originally posted by Aros.MotionRC
                                      Nice clarification pmisuinas and good job everyone for keeping the debate from turning sideways. :Cool:
                                      You know we don't turn things sideways on the Squawk....that's why I hang and participate here versus over 'there' where it sometimes gets ugly. ;)
                                      Warbird Charlie
                                      HSD Skyraider FlightLine OV-10 FMS 1400: P-40B, P-51, F4U, F6F, T-28, P-40E, Pitts, 1700 F4U & F7F, FOX glider Freewing A-6, T-33, P-51 Dynam ME-262, Waco TF Giant P-47; ESM F7F-3 LX PBJ-1 EFL CZ T-28, C-150, 1500 P-51 & FW-190

                                      Comment

                                      • Aros
                                        Lead Adminstrator / Warbirdaholic

                                        • May 2013
                                        • 8211
                                        • Astoria, OR
                                        • Send PM

                                        #3059
                                        Exactly! Squawk is an ego-free community. Well, as much as an R/C airplane forum community can be! LOL
                                        My YouTube RC videos:
                                        https://www.youtube.com/@toddbreda

                                        Comment

                                        • rifleman_btx
                                          me

                                          • Dec 2016
                                          • 5246
                                          • West Point TX
                                          • Send PM

                                          #3060
                                          That's why I like it here. And keeping up with Motion projects is a plus.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...