You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Share Your Pics and Videos for the Live Show

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Evan D
    replied
    No problem for me. They may not be available... weekend and world cup???

    Leave a comment:


  • WarbirdFan66
    replied
    just a Question, does anyone else have problems to get into the F-22 Forum or is it just me...asking because the Admin for the site does not react to my e-mails...at all

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Outstanding job Stuwe!!!
    You never disappoint! :D

    ...Also time for me to post some serious FPV work too ^^

    Leave a comment:


  • stuwe
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post

    Outstanding as usual. The only "somewhat odd" thing I caught was the occasional shadow of the aircraft to the right and below (which lends to the accuracy), implying that the sun is above to the left. But the shadows on the scenery are from the sun directly ahead. So I've concluded that the flight is real and not faked, although you are flying on a planet with 2 suns! Sign me up for a trip!
    Haha, good one Hugh :) thanks for the nice compliment. i twisted the camera view a bit where the shadow was close - thought it looks cool with the shadow next to the plane as you can kinda say what plane it is. glad you've liked it. keep up your gorgeous builds!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by stuwe View Post
    Hello James and fellow pilots and Motion RC fans. it's this time of the year again when i try to enter the competition with a humble video from Switzerland. (this time not via support ticket). I hope I can encourage the discussion on the show a bit on "how did he fake it this time" :) enjoy the flight!

    Outstanding as usual. The only "somewhat odd" thing I caught was the occasional shadow of the aircraft to the right and below (which lends to the accuracy), implying that the sun is above to the left. But the shadows on the scenery are from the sun directly ahead. So I've concluded that the flight is real and not faked, although you are flying on a planet with 2 suns! Sign me up for a trip!

    Leave a comment:


  • stuwe
    replied
    Hello James and fellow pilots and Motion RC fans. it's this time of the year again when i try to enter the competition with a humble video from Switzerland. (this time not via support ticket). I hope I can encourage the discussion on the show a bit on "how did he fake it this time" :) enjoy the flight!

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by Didonat View Post
    Painted for visibility. "Protector of the Nile"
    Didonat, Excellent repaint. Well done, Sir. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Didonat
    replied
    Painted for visibility. "Protector of the Nile"
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    After the crashes, the Gripen is back in the air and kickin' ass!




    Although the repairs made her nose heavy again, duh! :'(

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    This should provide some entertainment... lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by paulrkytek View Post
    It has been a big week here in the UK as we said goodbye to the Queen. A typical grey September day here in Yorkshire, 3mph wind, maybe not an ideal day for flying or filming a grey plane but here is my maiden flight of of my Belgian Airforce Tiger themed 70mmF16. No trimming was required, first landing a bit hot but I got it slowed down and a bit more nose up for a gentle touch down on the second( why is it that always happens when the camera is not there



    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220917_210336_991.jpg
Views:	440
Size:	101.1 KB
ID:	357104
    Great Looking F-16 and nice flight. I'm sure the Queen would have approved of your "salute" to her rein!

    Leave a comment:


  • paulrkytek
    replied
    It has been a big week here in the UK as we said goodbye to the Queen. A typical grey September day here in Yorkshire, 3mph wind, maybe not an ideal day for flying or filming a grey plane but here is my maiden flight of of my Belgian Airforce Tiger themed 70mmF16. No trimming was required, first landing a bit hot but I got it slowed down and a bit more nose up for a gentle touch down on the second( why is it that always happens when the camera is not there



    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220917_210336_991.jpg
Views:	440
Size:	101.1 KB
ID:	357104

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Yep, not really. The fields surrounding the runway are not really smooth and you don't even have proper visibility to land on them so heading back to the runway was the right call. Though I probably should have aimed straight for the center of the runway and begin to turn sooner.

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Airguardian View Post
    Thank you! :)

    Here's the continuation to my little viking saga:



    Could be alternatively titled: 'When things in the North go down South' ROFL
    Was there any other place to land straight ahead,?? surprised you tried to bring it back, glad not much damage..

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Thank you! :)

    Here's the continuation to my little viking saga:



    Could be alternatively titled: 'When things in the North go down South' ROFL

    Leave a comment:


  • Cecil
    replied
    Originally posted by Airguardian View Post
    Taking Frode's F-16 out for a few rides during my trip to Norway...


    Very impressive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    More so when the plane isn't even yours!


    As for maneuverability, this one was less maneuverable but that was because of CG setting and control surface throws, nothing to do with the powerplant! :)
    In fact it was lighter and more powerful, so we could say it was much more capable in general, depending on how you set it up.
    Otherwise, it felt pretty much the same in the air, only much more powerful and you don't actually feel bad with yourself when you throttle up, thinking that you are killing a battery pack.

    It also had a bit of a pitch-up thrustline (which the EDF version doesn't) so while not dramatic, it allowed the plane to perform kulbits without thrust vectoring. (The EDF can't, though the right way to achieve this is to install vectored thrust, of course).

    The throttle delay in response makes it a bit trickier to fly though, so it's harder to time the throttle for the maneuvers, but you get used to it eventually, I guess. ^^

    Plane was overall much faster, retained energy better and could climb forever if you wished so.
    Plus, if using the throttle sparingly, you can easily get 6-8min of mixed aerobatic flight, which is totally bonkers. :D

    Leave a comment:


  • Marco Polo
    replied
    Originally posted by Airguardian View Post
    w00t



    Always a huge pucker factor when you have that much money flying through the air.

    We know turbines sound amazing, but how did it compare to an EDF in terms of flight performance (thrust, maneuverability, etc.)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    This one got more interesting... :p

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X