You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Freewing F/A-18C Hornet 90mm EDF Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by Waconut View Post
    Never mind I figured it out
    Not easy. I pulled everything out when I began my build. Can you imagine adding 3 sets of lights on each side and then running the wiring back through those same openings? It was not a pleasant task my friend. I feel your pain, Brother. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Waconut
    replied
    Never mind I figured it out

    Leave a comment:


  • Waconut
    replied
    Hi guys,
    I had a hard landing last fall and jammed the left main gear and it stopped working. I ordered a new gear and I am trying to get it installed. I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out how to get the wiring ran. I can’t even see where to unplug the one that is in the plane. Any tips on gear replacement on this would be appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cape Jets
    replied
    Originally posted by Mizer67 View Post

    The FMS and FW are essentially identical in terms of output in my testing. Within ~3-4%, with the thrust, price, weight, speed and efficiency nod(s) going to FMS. That being said it does take a bit of carving to make the FMS fit, whereas the FW is a drop in replacement.

    If you don't mind the extra 30 min. of work the 1850kv 6S FMS unit would be my pick, but at the same price (and they're typically much closer in price between one another if sourced from China direct), it's essentially close enough to be a non-factor and I'd defy anyone to identify the fan that was in the plane by how it flew alone.

    As it stands, assuming that is the pricing you have, the less expensive FMS unit seems like a no-brainer to me. I hate carving foam, but the pricing delta is significant enough that I'd take the plunge as $158 stings just that much more to me.

    I have no experience with Taft, but good experience with FMS and FW, so I'd pick one of those two.
    Good responses and pretty much what I came up with on choices. I currently have the FW 90mm 12 Blade In-runner in the F-16 Thunderbird (was in my F-15 till I went 8S on her) and loved the performance in the F-15. Currently have a FMS 90mm 8S in the F-15 and also really impressed with the FMS power so I went with the FMS 6S 90mm 12 Blade for the Blue F-18. Seems I am always bouncing power plants around my birds. I know both are really good but the cost savings and weight reduction of the FMS made the choice pretty easy. Carving out some foam is expected since I did the same thing to the F-15 to get the FMS 8S system to fit in her.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mizer67
    replied
    Originally posted by Cape Jets View Post
    So after seeing much debate on power for the F-18 ( 9 Blade vs 12 Blade) I have decided to upgrade the Blue to 12 blade. Question is which one. Here are the choices: Freewing 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1835kv @ $158. ( Hugh Wiedman's favorite 90mm) the FMS 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1850kv @ $116. or just for interest the Taft Hobby 11 Blade 3674-1500kv @ $73. The Freewing weighs in @ 530gr and 3900g thrust, the FMS weighs in at 560gr (the heaviest) 4000g thrust and the Taft weighs in at 430gr and 4400g thrust. On paper the Taft is the way to go. Lighter and more thrust and way less expensive.(but only 11 blade vs 12 blade) So please add some confusion to my decision and pipe in on the pro's and cons for each. Thx.....
    The FMS and FW are essentially identical in terms of output in my testing. Within ~3-4%, with the thrust, price, weight, speed and efficiency nod(s) going to FMS. That being said it does take a bit of carving to make the FMS fit, whereas the FW is a drop in replacement.

    If you don't mind the extra 30 min. of work the 1850kv 6S FMS unit would be my pick, but at the same price (and they're typically much closer in price between one another if sourced from China direct), it's essentially close enough to be a non-factor and I'd defy anyone to identify the fan that was in the plane by how it flew alone.

    As it stands, assuming that is the pricing you have, the less expensive FMS unit seems like a no-brainer to me. I hate carving foam, but the pricing delta is significant enough that I'd take the plunge as $158 stings just that much more to me.

    I have no experience with Taft, but good experience with FMS and FW, so I'd pick one of those two.

    Leave a comment:


  • The43rdHammer
    replied
    I don't know how it compares, but I had a Taft Hobby 90mm Cobra a few years ago (maybe 2018) .... I wasn't impressed and sold it on . Wouldn't buy another one and the stock power setup was 💩

     - High Performance EPO Electric Ducted Fan Jet.- With Flap System Installed.- With 90mm EDF (11 Blade) Installed.- With 11 x 9g Digital Metal Gear Servo Installed.- With New Version Full Metal Electric Servoless Retract Landing Gear With Suspension Leg Installed.  &nbs


    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by Cape Jets View Post
    So after seeing much debate on power for the F-18 ( 9 Blade vs 12 Blade) I have decided to upgrade the Blue to 12 blade. Question is which one. Here are the choices: Freewing 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1835kv @ $158. ( Hugh Wiedman's favorite 90mm) the FMS 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1850kv @ $116. or just for interest the Taft Hobby 11 Blade 3674-1500kv @ $73. The Freewing weighs in @ 530gr and 3900g thrust, the FMS weighs in at 560gr (the heaviest) 4000g thrust and the Taft weighs in at 430gr and 4400g thrust. On paper the Taft is the way to go. Lighter and more thrust and way less expensive.(but only 11 blade vs 12 blade) So please add some confusion to my decision and pipe in on the pro's and cons for each. Thx.....
    WOW, interesting choices. The FW is only my favorite because I haven't tried the FMS or Taft Hobby and I replaced much less powerful EDF's with the FW, so the difference was off the charts. But for the price (1/2 FW), the weight (100 g less) and the thrust (10% more), not sure you could do anything but try the Taft Hobby EDF. Interesting that it weighs so much less than the other 2. I kinda stuck with FW because I'm comfortable with their product and know their customer service-sometimes it's tough to teach old dogs new tricks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cape Jets
    replied
    So after seeing much debate on power for the F-18 ( 9 Blade vs 12 Blade) I have decided to upgrade the Blue to 12 blade. Question is which one. Here are the choices: Freewing 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1835kv @ $158. ( Hugh Wiedman's favorite 90mm) the FMS 90mm 12 Blade 4068-1850kv @ $116. or just for interest the Taft Hobby 11 Blade 3674-1500kv @ $73. The Freewing weighs in @ 530gr and 3900g thrust, the FMS weighs in at 560gr (the heaviest) 4000g thrust and the Taft weighs in at 430gr and 4400g thrust. On paper the Taft is the way to go. Lighter and more thrust and way less expensive.(but only 11 blade vs 12 blade) So please add some confusion to my decision and pipe in on the pro's and cons for each. Thx.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Aros
    replied
    LOL!

    Leave a comment:


  • The43rdHammer
    replied
    Aros meant to say, great job on the Friday Cameo ... guest starring Todd Breda the Viper Dunkin' Raider... 👍

    Andy

    Leave a comment:


  • Aros
    replied
    Originally posted by The43rdHammer View Post
    I loved this.... all you needed was some white smoke 👍 Cameo performance from the pesky wheel stuck down, I think it wanted to be the star of the video. Never work with children, animals or retracts!
    LOL, right? I just wanted a nice view for folks and as I upload the video I was like, "Ah, come on!!"

    Leave a comment:


  • The43rdHammer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman View Post
    The43rdHammer Andy, you hit the nail on the head, just checked my DX9, same thing, looks pretty simple to set up. Thanks for your investigations, Mr. Holmes!

    Just not sure if I'm ready to give it a try and maybe Aros has an idea of trying it out on a "disposable" aircraft (hmmm, now which one is going to be the guinea pig?)
    🤣 absolutely, nobody should do anything they feel uncomfortable doing, just following up on my previous email(s).

    I suspect this is more relevant for those of us out there with 9-blade inrunner setups (80mm or 90mm).

    Things were twitching that shouldn't have twitched when I tried it, but then again I felt like I had nothing to lose at the time and had at least had some experience with it on other fixed wing aircraft.

    I did try it on my trusty L-39 beforehand.

    Andy

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    The43rdHammer Andy, you hit the nail on the head, just checked my DX9, same thing, looks pretty simple to set up. Thanks for your investigations, Mr. Holmes!

    Just not sure if I'm ready to give it a try and maybe Aros has an idea of trying it out on a "disposable" aircraft (hmmm, now which one is going to be the guinea pig?) Only concerned that I'm so used to throttle placement with my fingers (my visual judgement of actual airspeed kinda sucks in windy conditions), especially on landing approach and landing that I'll be too slow at the lower end of the throttle curve that I'll end up with a wing stall, and the F-18 is not a fun airframe to wing stall at low altitudes. Obviously it worked great for you on battery management but doubt I have the same skills. Interested to hear how it works on your A-10, but since I'm already getting 5 minutes on that and 4 minutes on the F-18, will probably just leave those as is. I used to be able to get an additional indication of EDF "speed" with the older fans from their whining noise, but since I've converted all my 90 mm to the 12 blade inrunner, it's not quite as noticeable.

    Leave a comment:


  • The43rdHammer
    replied
    Hi all, so I was messing around with my (old) DX6 and came up with this curve, which I think is similar to the one I have on my Futaba, for Futaba users an EXP2 curve of 50% worked best for me, lower curves reduced the benefit exponentially (pun intended):

    Click image for larger version

Name:	01.jpg
Views:	519
Size:	112.0 KB
ID:	308386

    Click image for larger version

Name:	02.jpg
Views:	519
Size:	178.3 KB
ID:	308387

    Click image for larger version

Name:	03.jpg
Views:	526
Size:	175.1 KB
ID:	308388

    Click image for larger version

Name:	05.jpg
Views:	523
Size:	176.2 KB
ID:	308389

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8243.jpg
Views:	534
Size:	145.2 KB
ID:	308390

    I think I'd maybe try something around 30% throttle @ 50% stick to begin with:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	04.jpg
Views:	522
Size:	182.4 KB
ID:	308391

    Andy


    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • The43rdHammer
    replied
    Originally posted by Aros View Post
    Perfect!

    Nice sorties today...

    I loved this.... all you needed was some white smoke 👍

    Cameo performance from the pesky wheel stuck down, I think it wanted to be the star of the video. Never work with children, animals or retracts!

    Andy

    Leave a comment:


  • Elbee
    replied
    Originally posted by Hawk4me View Post
    Anyone able to tell me if the carbon fiber rails in the battery bay will affect RX/TX signal at all? I relocated my receiver to the front just above the gear and I can't seem to get a good spot to put the antenna of my receiver without getting it close to that rail in the fuse. Got a satellite for it that will go up in the nose section and face the same problem up there.
    You won't have any issues with the CF rods the way you described your install. Do remember, though, CF will conduct electrons. So be aware of wire abrasion or open connectors. Best, LB

    Leave a comment:


  • Hawk4me
    replied
    Anyone able to tell me if the carbon fiber rails in the battery bay will affect RX/TX signal at all? I relocated my receiver to the front just above the gear and I can't seem to get a good spot to put the antenna of my receiver without getting it close to that rail in the fuse. Got a satellite for it that will go up in the nose section and face the same problem up there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aros
    replied
    Perfect!

    Nice sorties today...

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by Aros View Post
    My buddy Perry showed me throttle curves today...It's stupid easy to set up but I still need to see it in action so I will try it out on a model I don't worry about if something happens to it just to see the effect in action. I love the idea of it and I can totally see how it can help manage battery life.
    Yeah, I might try it also, I have a 3 yr old 80mm F-86 beater jet I might just try it on...

    Leave a comment:


  • Aros
    replied
    My buddy Perry showed me throttle curves today...It's stupid easy to set up but I still need to see it in action so I will try it out on a model I don't worry about if something happens to it just to see the effect in action. I love the idea of it and I can totally see how it can help manage battery life.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X