You must Sign-in or Register to post messages in the Hobby Squawk community
Registration is FREE and only takes a few moments

Register now

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Freewing MiG-29 Fulcrum Twin 80mm Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Airguardian
    replied
    Originally posted by heisteff View Post
    the white stick shows just about the correct lenght of the axle. hope it helps
    Outstanding work!
    Now the stabs deflect in a proper scale fashion!
    Could you please send some pics of the model with the stabs deflected pitch up and pitch down? :D

    That configuration should indeed reduce the stress translated to the airframe, the stress seen by the own stab and the torque around the shaft that a servo would have to overcome. But since you didn't change the servo angle and it still actuates parallel to the airplane's longitudinal axis, that kinda spoils the mechanical advantage of having the correct scale axis.
    Ideally the servo linkage should act perpendicularly to the shaft. That said, the whole thing at least should translate to a more robust construction, more scale looking and more accurate flight dynamics to the full scale jet :)

    Leave a comment:


  • pullupnow
    replied
    [QUOTE=heisteff;n360168]Hi folks

    roughly one year of work, here is my version of the mig

    Wow!!
    Masterful work!
    enjoy flying her.

    Thanks for sharing

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper View Post
    Your airbrake set up is very intricate. I don't have the talent to do it. I was hoping that Motion was going to bring out the airbrake kit when they brought out the vector thrust nozzles.
    Do you know if the airbrakes actually help reduce the ground roll after landing? Being such a heavy plane, my MiG rolls "forever". Airbrakes or reverse would really be of help.
    Hi I don't really know yet if they do slow down the plane, but I would think down to a certain speed they would. She hasn't flown yet, that day was for pics and runway tests. My intensions are more for inflight use of the brakes (we'll see). It has nothing to do with talent it is just about patients making mods like that (about two weeks from the idea to finish, same with the cockpit ore the elevators)

    stefan

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    At least yours can be jogged. Mine is often times in a state of permanent hibernation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Memory jogged…

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D View Post
    I don’t remember FW or Motion saying an airbrakes was in the works.

    the issue with rudder airbrakes is channel count as you need two additional channels just for that, steering and each rudder needs its own channel. Add the additional channels that TV requires and it adds up.
    Not based on anything "in the works". It's based purely on what Alpha, C. MoMo and wolpertinger posted over 2 years ago.
    Originally posted by Alpha View Post
    If enough people order the MiG-29 PNP and ARF and we think the model has legs to support more aftermarket upgrades, we might consider producing other things such as an upgrade air brake set, also Sold Separately, shown below. But candidly, we're waiting to see how to model itself takes off before over-committing to more upgrades. We've seen it in the past where most pilots end up flying/loving the stock PNP model (which is great!) and the upgrade market fizzles.

    We'll see what the community does.

    Click image for larger version Name:	Prototype Air Brake 3DPUP Upgrade Option (not in the PNP).jpg Views:	0 Size:	112.4 KB ID:	267157

    Originally posted by Captain MoMo View Post
    Amazing model. Look forward to my maiden! Would love to get the upgrades for TV and air brakes. Please let us know when and where to order.
    Originally posted by wolpertinger View Post
    I read earlier that air brakes could be an option upgrade. Is this still being considered?

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    I don’t remember FW or Motion saying an airbrakes was in the works.

    the issue with rudder airbrakes is channel count as you need two additional channels just for that, steering and each rudder needs its own channel. Add the additional channels that TV requires and it adds up.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D View Post
    Motion doesn't "bring out" things. Free Wing does.

    I'm 100% sure it helps as when I use crow and rudder air brakes on landing it very much shortens out my roll out.
    You're correct, but the point still remains. That airbrake "kit" was supposed to come about the same time as the VT nozzles. I wonder what happened to the airbrakes.
    I may have to do the rudder brakes in lieu of those airbrakes. I use rudder brakes on my Flex Pirana and they work extremely well but that's on a belly lander, so speed decreases long before touchdown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Motion doesn't "bring out" things. Free Wing does.

    I'm 100% sure it helps as when I use crow and rudder air brakes on landing it very much shortens out my roll out.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Your airbrake set up is very intricate. I don't have the talent to do it. I was hoping that Motion was going to bring out the airbrake kit when they brought out the vector thrust nozzles.
    Do you know if the airbrakes actually help reduce the ground roll after landing? Being such a heavy plane, my MiG rolls "forever". Airbrakes or reverse would really be of help.

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    ok for the airbrakes, it´s a little bit like on t33jetmans pictures. i use one 3.5 kg servo instead and a ballink leverage, printed out some servoarms ( bent forward somemore then normal). the "brakepedals" where shaped / cut out inside to fit the parachutetube (3d of thingivers) and after the hinges where done i glassed them with a 23gr fiberglas. the bottompiece (about 15 cm) that was cut out screws back on so you can access it for maintenance and for my elevators i attached some pics too. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0326.jpg
Views:	632
Size:	121.4 KB
ID:	360264Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0334.jpg
Views:	644
Size:	122.0 KB
ID:	360265Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0332.jpg
Views:	634
Size:	95.8 KB
ID:	360266Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0329.jpg
Views:	707
Size:	103.7 KB
ID:	360267Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0328.jpg
Views:	644
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	360268Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0327.jpg
Views:	612
Size:	93.1 KB
ID:	360269Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0331.jpg
Views:	607
Size:	41.0 KB
ID:	360270Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0333.jpg
Views:	642
Size:	162.1 KB
ID:	360271Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0330.jpg
Views:	612
Size:	124.6 KB
ID:	360272 the white stick shows just about the correct lenght of the axle. hope it helps

    greetings stefan

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    @heisteff​ Can you tell us and show us what you did to get the airbrakes to work?

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    yes thats what i did, i dont know if it really takes any load of the stab, since the axle is at about 25% MAC and there is quiet some more wingarea in the "wind" then at the stocksetup (axle in the middle). so i thought more powerfull servos wont hurt, just by my feeling. most importend improvement by that mod is the stiffnes of the tail i think

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    Originally posted by heisteff View Post
    Thanks happy you like it,

    to Kai; the elevons are comlettly rebuild to scale mechanics so the axel is going halfway into the fuse
    I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. Did you change the angle of the taileron rotation axle to be swept back, like the real thing?

    If so, that should relieve the load on the stab. servos. (See, for example, posts 2712 and 2842 in this thread).

    I believe Airguardian reached the same conclusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    Thanks happy you like it,

    to Kai; the elevons are comlettly rebuild to scale mechanics so the axel is going halfway into the fuse, there are operated by HS 645 MG -Servos, power is supplied by the BEC of the Controllers. but i might give it a external bec since i need a little bit of weight in the nose (due to one 16000 flight battery)

    Stefan

    Leave a comment:


  • sunbeam
    replied
    Brilliant work! It looks excellent! 👍 I just start to setup/rebuild mine, but I think I will not achieve your looks 😄
    Did you change the servos? What about your power supply? I will use a Powebox Pioneer together with two 12A BEC from two ESCs from YGE.

    Greetings, Kai

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    heisteff INCREDIBLE WORK, love the air brake, cockpit, rivet detail and of course the operable canopy. First Rate!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DCORSAIR
    replied
    Originally posted by heisteff View Post
    Hi folks

    roughly one year of work, here is my version of the mig

    greetings stefan Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0486.jpg
Views:	732
Size:	121.6 KB
ID:	360169Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0484.jpg
Views:	688
Size:	101.2 KB
ID:	360170Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0322.jpg
Views:	697
Size:	101.0 KB
ID:	360171Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0324.jpg
Views:	703
Size:	99.2 KB
ID:	360172Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0480.jpg
Views:	677
Size:	145.4 KB
ID:	360173Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0317.jpg
Views:	719
Size:	121.6 KB
ID:	360174Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0485.jpg
Views:	680
Size:	114.8 KB
ID:	360175Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0483.jpg
Views:	702
Size:	138.5 KB
ID:	360176Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0487.jpg
Views:	712
Size:	142.0 KB
ID:	360177Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0323.jpg
Views:	717
Size:	126.7 KB
ID:	360178Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0319.jpg
Views:	715
Size:	117.8 KB
ID:	360179Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0481.jpg
Views:	696
Size:	159.8 KB
ID:	360180Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0318.jpg
Views:	701
Size:	142.3 KB
ID:	360181Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0325.jpg
Views:	694
Size:	118.2 KB
ID:	360182Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0320.jpg
Views:	704
Size:	162.9 KB
ID:	360183Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0321.jpg
Views:	696
Size:	118.7 KB
ID:	360184

    Looks awesome...

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    Hi folks

    roughly one year of work, here is my version of the mig

    greetings stefan Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0486.jpg
Views:	732
Size:	121.6 KB
ID:	360169Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0484.jpg
Views:	688
Size:	101.2 KB
ID:	360170Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0322.jpg
Views:	697
Size:	101.0 KB
ID:	360171Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0324.jpg
Views:	703
Size:	99.2 KB
ID:	360172Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0480.jpg
Views:	677
Size:	145.4 KB
ID:	360173Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0317.jpg
Views:	719
Size:	121.6 KB
ID:	360174Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0485.jpg
Views:	680
Size:	114.8 KB
ID:	360175Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0483.jpg
Views:	702
Size:	138.5 KB
ID:	360176Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0487.jpg
Views:	712
Size:	142.0 KB
ID:	360177Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0323.jpg
Views:	717
Size:	126.7 KB
ID:	360178Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0319.jpg
Views:	715
Size:	117.8 KB
ID:	360179Click image for larger version

Name:	N50_0481.jpg
Views:	696
Size:	159.8 KB
ID:	360180Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0318.jpg
Views:	701
Size:	142.3 KB
ID:	360181Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0325.jpg
Views:	694
Size:	118.2 KB
ID:	360182Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0320.jpg
Views:	704
Size:	162.9 KB
ID:	360183Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0321.jpg
Views:	696
Size:	118.7 KB
ID:	360184

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Why post in this thread?

    Any 6 channel or more DSMX receiver. I like to separate steering from rudder so that’s 7ch. If you want an internal gyro like AS3X that changes what you need. I use Orange receivers and satellites. I don’t use gyros.

    Really if you need to ask there’s a issue.



    Leave a comment:

Working...
X