Official Freewing MiG-29 Fulcrum Twin 80mm Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GliderGuy
    replied
    We’re being forthcoming!

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    Yes but if you get the TVs you won't.
    Originally posted by GliderGuy
    And if you don’t get the TV, it may not last you long.
    -GG
    These are the greatest "one-two punch" replies I've ever seen here.

    Leave a comment:


  • GliderGuy
    replied
    And if you don’t get the TV, it may not last you long.

    -GG

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Yes but if you get the TVs you won't.

    Leave a comment:


  • ElCid
    replied
    Rumor has it Santa is bringing me one to add to the hanger. It appears that between MotionRC and most of the mods seen on this forum, it's become a very nice airplane. My question is can you just cruse around with it like i do with my F22?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wild Man
    replied
    I knew if I started, I would be up all night. I started with the tail, ( Horizontal stabilizer's ) So far, so good. I was up all night.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	D2C1B007-752F-48E9-BF8D-0ADA54607F9C.jpg Views:	0 Size:	102.6 KB ID:	361603Click image for larger version  Name:	1A45CA37-9735-4533-B484-36FFBA7B983C.jpg Views:	0 Size:	104.5 KB ID:	361604Click image for larger version  Name:	4B03AD20-4FB0-4969-BE60-20EFC641EB5E.jpg Views:	0 Size:	88.1 KB ID:	361605




    Leave a comment:


  • Wild Man
    replied
    Well I finally decided to go ahead and get one. After getting it out of the Box and Inspection done. All I have to say is What did I wait so long ?? Plan on painting this one RED' WHITE & BLUE. I have already started sanding the horizontal stabs

    Leave a comment:


  • fredmdbud
    replied
    But would he be willing to do the powered-descent-with-flaps scenario?​

    Leave a comment:


  • fredmdbud
    replied
    Originally posted by Airguardian

    Outstanding work!
    Now the stabs deflect in a proper scale fashion!
    Almost - there's some anhedral to the stabilators, too.

    There's a "stump" portion towards the front to provide clearance due to this angle.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    Hi
    here are some pics of the stabs (maximum deflection/way to high for in flight of course). yes the servo is not positioned optimal, but the problem is the space in the tailsection, the two balllinks help a lot to keep the "pushforce" straight (see pics). For the maingeardoors i have not had a idea to make it work without "wheelscratching" them, but who knows.

    Stefan

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0339.jpg
Views:	766
Size:	113.5 KB
ID:	360843Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0342.jpg
Views:	707
Size:	101.5 KB
ID:	360844Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0345.jpg
Views:	724
Size:	136.7 KB
ID:	360845Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0341.jpg
Views:	711
Size:	126.7 KB
ID:	360846Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0344.jpg
Views:	710
Size:	129.1 KB
ID:	360847Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0340.jpg
Views:	769
Size:	133.5 KB
ID:	360848Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0343.jpg
Views:	760
Size:	123.6 KB
ID:	360849

    Leave a comment:


  • Airguardian
    replied
    Originally posted by heisteff
    the white stick shows just about the correct lenght of the axle. hope it helps
    Outstanding work!
    Now the stabs deflect in a proper scale fashion!
    Could you please send some pics of the model with the stabs deflected pitch up and pitch down? :D

    That configuration should indeed reduce the stress translated to the airframe, the stress seen by the own stab and the torque around the shaft that a servo would have to overcome. But since you didn't change the servo angle and it still actuates parallel to the airplane's longitudinal axis, that kinda spoils the mechanical advantage of having the correct scale axis.
    Ideally the servo linkage should act perpendicularly to the shaft. That said, the whole thing at least should translate to a more robust construction, more scale looking and more accurate flight dynamics to the full scale jet :)

    Leave a comment:


  • pullupnow
    replied
    [QUOTE=heisteff;n360168]Hi folks

    roughly one year of work, here is my version of the mig

    Wow!!
    Masterful work!
    enjoy flying her.

    Thanks for sharing

    Leave a comment:


  • heisteff
    replied
    Originally posted by xviper
    Your airbrake set up is very intricate. I don't have the talent to do it. I was hoping that Motion was going to bring out the airbrake kit when they brought out the vector thrust nozzles.
    Do you know if the airbrakes actually help reduce the ground roll after landing? Being such a heavy plane, my MiG rolls "forever". Airbrakes or reverse would really be of help.
    Hi I don't really know yet if they do slow down the plane, but I would think down to a certain speed they would. She hasn't flown yet, that day was for pics and runway tests. My intensions are more for inflight use of the brakes (we'll see). It has nothing to do with talent it is just about patients making mods like that (about two weeks from the idea to finish, same with the cockpit ore the elevators)

    stefan

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    At least yours can be jogged. Mine is often times in a state of permanent hibernation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Memory jogged…

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    I don’t remember FW or Motion saying an airbrakes was in the works.

    the issue with rudder airbrakes is channel count as you need two additional channels just for that, steering and each rudder needs its own channel. Add the additional channels that TV requires and it adds up.
    Not based on anything "in the works". It's based purely on what Alpha, C. MoMo and wolpertinger posted over 2 years ago.
    Originally posted by Alpha
    If enough people order the MiG-29 PNP and ARF and we think the model has legs to support more aftermarket upgrades, we might consider producing other things such as an upgrade air brake set, also Sold Separately, shown below. But candidly, we're waiting to see how to model itself takes off before over-committing to more upgrades. We've seen it in the past where most pilots end up flying/loving the stock PNP model (which is great!) and the upgrade market fizzles.

    We'll see what the community does.

    Click image for larger version Name:	Prototype Air Brake 3DPUP Upgrade Option (not in the PNP).jpg Views:	0 Size:	112.4 KB ID:	267157

    Originally posted by Captain MoMo
    Amazing model. Look forward to my maiden! Would love to get the upgrades for TV and air brakes. Please let us know when and where to order.
    Originally posted by wolpertinger
    I read earlier that air brakes could be an option upgrade. Is this still being considered?

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    I don’t remember FW or Motion saying an airbrakes was in the works.

    the issue with rudder airbrakes is channel count as you need two additional channels just for that, steering and each rudder needs its own channel. Add the additional channels that TV requires and it adds up.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Originally posted by Evan D
    Motion doesn't "bring out" things. Free Wing does.

    I'm 100% sure it helps as when I use crow and rudder air brakes on landing it very much shortens out my roll out.
    You're correct, but the point still remains. That airbrake "kit" was supposed to come about the same time as the VT nozzles. I wonder what happened to the airbrakes.
    I may have to do the rudder brakes in lieu of those airbrakes. I use rudder brakes on my Flex Pirana and they work extremely well but that's on a belly lander, so speed decreases long before touchdown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evan D
    replied
    Motion doesn't "bring out" things. Free Wing does.

    I'm 100% sure it helps as when I use crow and rudder air brakes on landing it very much shortens out my roll out.

    Leave a comment:


  • xviper
    replied
    Your airbrake set up is very intricate. I don't have the talent to do it. I was hoping that Motion was going to bring out the airbrake kit when they brought out the vector thrust nozzles.
    Do you know if the airbrakes actually help reduce the ground roll after landing? Being such a heavy plane, my MiG rolls "forever". Airbrakes or reverse would really be of help.

    Leave a comment:

Working...