Official Freewing Twin 80mm/90mm A-10 Thunderbolt II Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • crxmanpat
    replied
    Originally posted by RAFALR30

    Hello

    I did not find in the manual information about getting the elevator 5 mm up.
    Maybe you mean information like in the manual: "Flap-elevator mix parameter.
    When deploying the flaps, the jet will tend to fly tail heavy. In order to correct this, we recommend a 'Flap/Elevator' mix
    within your radio. In this case, when you deploy the flaps, the airplane will maintain level flight.
    Setting range is as following:
    Deploy flaps to 50mm, pre-set the elevator 3mm down.
    Deploy flaps to 32mm, pre-set elevator 2mm down. Fine tune
    these settings according to your individual taste." ?
    It's actually the information directly above that:

    1. Correct elevator center position

    After assembly, adjust the elevator to
    its center position, please refer to the photo.
    After adjusting, the surface should look as if it has a little up
    elevator.

    The instructions don't say 5mm, but that is what it measures out to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • RAFALR30
    replied
    Originally posted by crxmanpat
    Welcome to Hobby Squawk!

    1. Yes. These mounts are universal for all Freewing planes that use them.
    2. If flying from grass, use the first link. If flying from a hard surface, use the second link.

    Also take note that in the stock form, the nose gear is the same as the second link you have. It's best to have the nose gear match up with the mains.

    CG is better at 86-90mm instead of the 78mm called for in the manual. And don't forget to set the elevators up 5mm for their neutral position (this is described in the manual).
    Hello

    I did not find in the manual information about getting the elevator 5 mm up.
    Maybe you mean information like in the manual: "Flap-elevator mix parameter.
    When deploying the flaps, the jet will tend to fly tail heavy. In order to correct this, we recommend a 'Flap/Elevator' mix
    within your radio. In this case, when you deploy the flaps, the airplane will maintain level flight.
    Setting range is as following:
    Deploy flaps to 50mm, pre-set the elevator 3mm down.
    Deploy flaps to 32mm, pre-set elevator 2mm down. Fine tune
    these settings according to your individual taste." ?

    Leave a comment:


  • RAFALR30
    replied
    Originally posted by crxmanpat
    Welcome to Hobby Squawk!

    1. Yes. These mounts are universal for all Freewing planes that use them.
    2. If flying from grass, use the first link. If flying from a hard surface, use the second link.

    Also take note that in the stock form, the nose gear is the same as the second link you have. It's best to have the nose gear match up with the mains.

    CG is better at 86-90mm instead of the 78mm called for in the manual. And don't forget to set the elevators up 5mm for their neutral position (this is described in the manual).
    crxmanpat thank you very much for Your answer and important information about CG and the elevator.

    Leave a comment:


  • crxmanpat
    replied
    Originally posted by RAFALR30
    Hello modellers.
    I bought a used A-10 from a friend.
    The model requires a few repairs.
    I have a questions:
    1. Does the set (handle) from F16 (EDF 90mm) fit the A-10? Are the dimensions of the pylon handles the same in both models?
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...re-fj306110916
    2. Which main landing gear is better for the A-10?
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...eft-fj31111085
    or
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...ft-fj311110812
    Welcome to Hobby Squawk!

    1. Yes. These mounts are universal for all Freewing planes that use them.
    2. If flying from grass, use the first link. If flying from a hard surface, use the second link.

    Also take note that in the stock form, the nose gear is the same as the second link you have. It's best to have the nose gear match up with the mains.

    CG is better at 86-90mm instead of the 78mm called for in the manual. And don't forget to set the elevators up 5mm for their neutral position (this is described in the manual).

    Leave a comment:


  • RAFALR30
    replied
    Hello modellers.
    I bought a used A-10 from a friend.
    The model requires a few repairs.
    I have a questions:
    1. Does the set (handle) from F16 (EDF 90mm) fit the A-10? Are the dimensions of the pylon handles the same in both models?
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...re-fj306110916
    2. Which main landing gear is better for the A-10?
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...eft-fj31111085
    or
    https://www.motionrc.eu/products/fre...ft-fj311110812

    Leave a comment:


  • Mud Duck
    replied
    Originally posted by crxmanpat
    Did you buy the door parts from Motion? If so, you should have gotten a white plastic spacer, a spring, and a screw. This is what it should look like with everything.
    Thanks! I did buy the gear doors from Motion R/C. That’s exactly what I needed to see. 👍

    Leave a comment:


  • crxmanpat
    replied
    Originally posted by Mud Duck
    A favor, please. 🙏 I’m trying to remount the nose wheel gear doors on my A-10 (when I bought it used, it didn’t have any) and I’m unsure about how the rearward door mounts to the strut. I think I’m missing pieces, but if someone could kindly post a photo of that gear door, I would greatly appreciate it. TIA. 🙂
    Did you buy the door parts from Motion? If so, you should have gotten a white plastic spacer, a spring, and a screw. This is what it should look like with everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mud Duck
    replied
    A favor, please. 🙏 I’m trying to remount the nose wheel gear doors on my A-10 (when I bought it used, it didn’t have any) and I’m unsure about how the rearward door mounts to the strut. I think I’m missing pieces, but if someone could kindly post a photo of that gear door, I would greatly appreciate it. TIA. 🙂
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • gooniac33
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman
    Got out Wednesday with a few and got 4 flights in on my A-10 for the first time in a while. With our typical Spring winds being so strong for the last couple months, I had an opportunity to change my Mig-29 fans to the FMS 12 blade 3280-2100Kv inrunners (not that it need it with the TV nozzles) which added about 25% more thrust (have yet to get that up yet). I took the Mig fans (9-blade 3658-1920 Kv inrunners) and put them in my A-10 replacing the old outrunners (not that it needed it), which increased the thrust 15-20%. Talk about "Killing Two Birds With One Stone". WOW, really made a difference on getting off of grass and it's speed and vertical is outstanding. I've never flown it without all the ordinance, even on the maiden, so that's a testimony to it's incredible flight characteristics.

    I had painted those swirly white things on the fan hub and the first time out RudyD54 asked why it sounded like an "angry mosquito" as in the Mig they sounded great. He checked it and told me the fans were out of balance, probably due to the painted hubs. It was vibrating so much my JHH pilot came down with his eyes crossed and missed the post flight briefing due to a massive migraine. Well I guess you really can "teach old dogs new tricks" so thanks to gooniac33 and his outstanding fan balancing videos, it's now "quiet as a church mouse" except for the "whoose". Now if I can just figure out what all the hoopla is about over this thing called CG, I might be getting somewhere.

    Anyway, I do have to say the A-10 is the best and easiest flying EDF I have. I'd almost recommend it as an EDF trainer and with it's large size, orientation is never an issue. Easy to see why it's been around for so long and continues to sell well while never having to be upgraded; what can you do to something that's close to perfect except mess it up. I had zero complaints with the stock outrunner fans, but the Mig fans are spectacular in it. On 2 SMC 6200's I have my timer set at 5:30 and come down with 38-40% in the tank, flying it much faster than scale. If I spend the flight more scale like, I can get over 7 minutes before my flight pack voltage telemetry indicates low voltage. Thanks to FW/MRC for keeping this one on the Flight Line. If this was a HH product, it would have been gone long ago (and the overall quality would not have been as good, IMO).
    really glad to hear the videos helped!! And yes those SMC packs are pretty dang awesome!! I need to try some...

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    commented on 's reply
    Plan to when the flying season ends, just gotta fly it grey stock for now just because it has been so damn long since I've had a hog in the air.

  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by OV10
    Hello Hugh Wiedman ,

    Your the best, I have printed out your most excellent setup details to add to the manual I D/L'd from the Motion website. Your effort/time is greatly appreciated

    Your comment "I know you'll end up loving this aircraft." had me saying "ya think!! " Just because it took me sooooo long to replace didn't mean I lost the fever for it.
    I was the first to fly one @ Muncie ( maiden) the day before Pilot Ryan and Cap'n Mike and Steve - RCjetdude arrived for NEFI 2017.
    Here's two pics that Alpha posted #4379 from that event.

    Mines the blue Artic Thunder


    While rummaging through the thread looking for the pictoral evidence, I was reminded of how far off we all had the CG back then.
    The book called 78 while most were doing mid 80's and as evidenced by your flight/landing that it really belonged in the 90's.
    Boy were we flying some nose heavy hogs back then which explained why my memory of landings was much faster than what your vid showed.
    The CF rods have been already installed by the previous owner so the only thing I have to do is move that circuit card and batt trays aft.
    A big THANX again Hugh for all the valuable info.
    OMG, I really like the Blue Arctic Thunder! Are you resurrecting that one?

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Hello Hugh Wiedman ,

    Your the best, I have printed out your most excellent setup details to add to the manual I D/L'd from the Motion website. Your effort/time is greatly appreciated

    Your comment "I know you'll end up loving this aircraft." had me saying "ya think!! " Just because it took me sooooo long to replace didn't mean I lost the fever for it.
    I was the first to fly one @ Muncie ( maiden) the day before Pilot Ryan and Cap'n Mike and Steve - RCjetdude arrived for NEFI 2017.
    Here's two pics that Alpha posted #4379 from that event.

    Mines the blue Artic Thunder


    While rummaging through the thread looking for the pictoral evidence, I was reminded of how far off we all had the CG back then.
    The book called 78 while most were doing mid 80's and as evidenced by your flight/landing that it really belonged in the 90's.
    Boy were we flying some nose heavy hogs back then which explained why my memory of landings was much faster than what your vid showed.
    The CF rods have been already installed by the previous owner so the only thing I have to do is move that circuit card and batt trays aft.
    A big THANX again Hugh for all the valuable info.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Originally posted by OV10
    Hugh Wiedman Hello Hugh,

    It's been 5 years since I mid aired my Hog with TI's (George Baker) Corsair down at fall Triple Tree (the year before it became Fall Nall)
    I just recently replaced it with a gently used one for less than half the cost of new. I also got a BNIP set of the oleo mains and an AR8010T still in the fuse for that frugal sale price.

    Anyways, the reason I write is because my old manual with all my setup notes is long lost. After watching your video, I knew that I could get some solid info from you.

    Where is your CG set? What IS the hoopla you are referring to about the CG?
    If I remember correctly, there was a 4mm up ELE trim setup to compensate for the inability to get the book CG appropriate due to the limited aft movement of batteries

    Since you are using 6200 SMC's, I'm thinking I should not have any issue getting the 5300 SMC's I have to balance.
    Anxiously await your input
    It remains to be seen whether you get any "solid info from me", but here goes. The recommended CG balance point per the manual is 78mm. It seems that for many, including me, that balance point is way too nose heavy, which in some cases may lead to a landing orientation that is level or worse, with the nose gear touching first, which results in an uncontrollable bucking bronco which always seems to end badly (or so I'm told). I can't say for certain that's what caused others to bounce the landing (never flown mine at 78mm) or if the pilots just landed too fast and failed to get it into a nose up landing position. Either way, for me at least, I found that I really like the way it flies at 92mm-95mm. I've never flown it without all the ordinance, but you'll find that she slows down very nicely (slower than you can possibly image) with full flaps/gear down without stalling and is very responsive to flaring just before touch down. I'm not the best pilot out there and landings are easily the hardest part for me to get exactly right, but with the A-10 and maybe 100 flights, I've never had a bad landing (and that's either a miracle or a testament to the incredible stable flight of this model). You may even be able to go further back, but I kind of settled at 92mm and it stuck. I would recommend that you start at maybe 88mm and work your way back (I can't tell you how it flies without the ordinance, so if you fly it without, it may just be a little bit different, but probably not enough to worry about).

    Also, I fly off of grass and for maybe 60 flights I used the trailing link nose gear (as many recommended for grass). Last 40 flights switched back to the stock and actually like it better on grass as occasionally the trailing link gear door would get stuck against the wheel when fully compressed causing it to completely stop turning. It was like slamming on the brakes (even happened a couple of times on take-off when I hit some bumpy parts, compressed the nose gear and it put the brakes on).

    You should be able to get just about any balance point you want using the SMC 5300's. Great batteries and they weigh 130 gr less each than the 6200's I'm using. For those, I had to remove the circuit board in the back and mount it on the fuselage wall so I could shove the batteries as far back as possible. I also had to extend the floor of the front battery tray as the fuselage has a step down in the front and the location of the front battery for me had it hanging over that step. You shouldn't have any issues positioning yours. I'm getting a minimum of 5 minutes flight time, but also using the AR6360T with gyro and in-flight battery voltage telemetry, which your RX also has, and I rarely even get to the point of a low battery warning. I'm usually at the pits with 40% left. Suggest you start at 4:00 and work your way into a final timer setting.

    On the elevator trim for flaps, mine required absolutely no extra trim for either flap settings (maybe the only aircraft I have that didn't require any compensation). The neutral elevator position per the manual had the elevator lined up with the bottom of rear light and another round "thingy" (see photo below). Not sure, but I think I ended up with slightly less than that, most likely due to the more rearward balance point. Regarding rates, I pretty much use manual rates and use a 3 position switch so I also have mid rates (but fly it on high rates). I do use about 2mm more on the high rates for both elevator and aileron, and rudder high rates around 30mm instead of 26mm in an effort to make knife edge a little better. On the flaps, I am using more than the manual, with take-off flaps at 30mm (same as manual) but landing flaps at 50mm instead of 40mm per the manual. Of course, all this is personal preference, so the book rates are a good place to start.

    The only modifications I did, other than cosmetic of course, was moving the board to allow the batteries to go further back as I mentioned above and I also added a 5mm square carbon fiber tube with length of about 24" glued into the existing channel on each side of the front half of the fuselage. Not sure it's necessary, but someone recommended it and the empty channel just looked like a good place to stiffen the fuselage considering the weight of 2 batteries. I also recently swapped out the stock 80mm outrunner fans with the 3658-1920 Kv 9 blade inrunner fans from my Mig (which I upgraded to FMS fans with 25% more thrust). It honestly didn't need it, took off fine on grass, climbed with ease and had plenty of power, but I didn't want those Mig fans to go to waste and they did give me about 15% more thrust, more efficiency on battery use, takes off from all kinds of heavy grass much better, and climbs like a rocket!

    Hope some of this helps, if you have any other questions, just ask. I know you'll end up loving this aircraft. IMO, it is definitely the easiest EDF to fly and land and when it's with me, it's always the first up because it really relaxes me to fly it and I get a load of confidence before moving on to something else.

    The photos below show the location of my batteries (that was using 2 Roaring Top 6250's, which weigh about the same as the SMC 6200's I'm now using) and also the carbon fiber tube. Third photo is the rates and elevator neutral position from the manual.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20210328_184930.jpg
Views:	1104
Size:	98.2 KB
ID:	345273Click image for larger version

Name:	20210328_184428.jpg
Views:	944
Size:	122.4 KB
ID:	345274Click image for larger version

Name:	20220508_193006.jpg
Views:	931
Size:	173.9 KB
ID:	345275

    Leave a comment:


  • OV10
    replied
    Hugh Wiedman Hello Hugh,

    It's been 5 years since I mid aired my Hog with TI's (George Baker) Corsair down at fall Triple Tree (the year before it became Fall Nall)
    I just recently replaced it with a gently used one for less than half the cost of new. I also got a BNIP set of the oleo mains and an AR8010T still in the fuse for that frugal sale price.

    Anyways, the reason I write is because my old manual with all my setup notes is long lost. After watching your video, I knew that I could get some solid info from you.

    Where is your CG set? What IS the hoopla you are referring to about the CG?
    If I remember correctly, there was a 4mm up ELE trim setup to compensate for the inability to get the book CG appropriate due to the limited aft movement of batteries

    Since you are using 6200 SMC's, I'm thinking I should not have any issue getting the 5300 SMC's I have to balance.
    Anxiously await your input

    Leave a comment:


  • jasmith41
    replied
    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman
    Sweet! Love that bird. My first edf was the eflite a10 and while i'm on my second one (first one got handed down to my buddy who's just starting out as well), it's the one i look forward to flying the most, other than the FW F8 crusader (really small, but fun fun).
    Great piloting Hugh - love the livery too - i may do an arctic camo on my FW A10 if i ever get it out of the box...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hugh Wiedman
    replied
    Got out Wednesday with a few and got 4 flights in on my A-10 for the first time in a while. With our typical Spring winds being so strong for the last couple months, I had an opportunity to change my Mig-29 fans to the FMS 12 blade 3280-2100Kv inrunners (not that it need it with the TV nozzles) which added about 25% more thrust (have yet to get that up yet). I took the Mig fans (9-blade 3658-1920 Kv inrunners) and put them in my A-10 replacing the old outrunners (not that it needed it), which increased the thrust 15-20%. Talk about "Killing Two Birds With One Stone". WOW, really made a difference on getting off of grass and it's speed and vertical is outstanding. I've never flown it without all the ordinance, even on the maiden, so that's a testimony to it's incredible flight characteristics.

    I had painted those swirly white things on the fan hub and the first time out RudyD54 asked why it sounded like an "angry mosquito" as in the Mig they sounded great. He checked it and told me the fans were out of balance, probably due to the painted hubs. It was vibrating so much my JHH pilot came down with his eyes crossed and missed the post flight briefing due to a massive migraine. Well I guess you really can "teach old dogs new tricks" so thanks to gooniac33 and his outstanding fan balancing videos, it's now "quiet as a church mouse" except for the "whoose". Now if I can just figure out what all the hoopla is about over this thing called CG, I might be getting somewhere.

    Anyway, I do have to say the A-10 is the best and easiest flying EDF I have. I'd almost recommend it as an EDF trainer and with it's large size, orientation is never an issue. Easy to see why it's been around for so long and continues to sell well while never having to be upgraded; what can you do to something that's close to perfect except mess it up. I had zero complaints with the stock outrunner fans, but the Mig fans are spectacular in it. On 2 SMC 6200's I have my timer set at 5:30 and come down with 38-40% in the tank, flying it much faster than scale. If I spend the flight more scale like, I can get over 7 minutes before my flight pack voltage telemetry indicates low voltage. Thanks to FW/MRC for keeping this one on the Flight Line. If this was a HH product, it would have been gone long ago (and the overall quality would not have been as good, IMO).

    Leave a comment:


  • cdbody@msn.com
    replied
    That's what was so puzzling

    Leave a comment:


  • kallend
    replied
    All worked properly when first set up.
    Originally posted by cdbody@msn.com
    The crew at Motion RC solved my problem. It was simply a change to the wing configuration in the Transmitter program. One aileron and one flap, I had it setup as two for each. Once they guided me through the problem (about 4 minutes of their time I was up and running. test flight coming soon.
    Funny that it worked properly at first, and then didn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • cdbody@msn.com
    replied
    The crew at Motion RC solved my problem. It was simply a change to the wing configuration in the Transmitter program. One aileron and one flap, I had it setup as two for each. Once they guided me through the problem (about 4 minutes of their time I was up and running. test flight coming soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • SanExup
    replied
    Is your bind plug still in?

    Leave a comment:

Working...