Originally posted by ColtPilot
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Freewing MiG-29 Fulcrum Twin 80mm Thread
Collapse
X
-
GliderGuy Thanks for posting your maiden report! I'm glad you agree with what we've shown and others who've flown it have shared, this bird is a big sweetheart!
t33jetman Unfortunately at this rate it would take me another ~120 more hours of nonstop calls to call everyone personally, not including the 25 hours I've called over the past 28. But not to worry, you and each and every of our customers are on my nice list! I wish I had the time to talk to all of you directly to share the information we've posted here and take a few minutes to catch up and see what else you all are building around the world these days. Many of you have been very busy bees!
Live Q&A every Tuesday and Friday at 9pm EST on my Twitch Livestream
Live chat with me and other RC Nuts on my Discord
Camp my Instagram @Alpha.Makes
- Likes 3
Comment
-
When I saw mine was not shipped and the website now said October, I cancelled my order. No big rush as I have plenty of other planes to take its place in the pipeline, plus the beta-testers, er, pre-order customers will help iron out any remaining kinks.Originally posted by Rc4me21976 View Post
Yup same thing here I ordered towards the end of August and was told that this afternoon as well. Well actually early October.
Comment
-
"aged" years" "days" "time" "sleep" What are these terms of which you speak?Originally posted by paulrkytek View Posti suspect Alpha has aged 10 years in the last 2 days, time to sleep if you canLive Q&A every Tuesday and Friday at 9pm EST on my Twitch Livestream
Live chat with me and other RC Nuts on my Discord
Camp my Instagram @Alpha.Makes
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I use flight mode for the flap to elevator trim mix. No percentages to deal with. Fly, set the elevator trim at each flap setting and you're done. That goes for gear down also.Originally posted by Josh911 View PostI’d like to know what everyone used for flaps/elevator ratios in the transmitter setup and well as expo settings.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I would have to disagree with that. Trying to fly a nose heavy model slowly is some of the more awkward and hazardous thing you can do - normally.Originally posted by JLambCWU View PostIf you’re going to slow flight the jet, your probably better off with the CG a bit further forward until you’re comfortable with how the jet enters and recovers from it.
Obviously have no experience with this particular model yet, but if comparing to the SU-35, it will act pretty damn nasty of forced to high alpha with a poor cg.
To look at it from a different angle: Wait with very slow flight/high alpha until you have worked your way into a proper CG.
Freewing A-10 turbine conversion: http://fb.me/FreewingA10TurbineConversion
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Well, balancing in terms of mass is just not very important at all - it does help mitigate the onset of flutter at high speeds, but even for that, tight linkages and tight servos (no free play) is far, far more important.Originally posted by Lcacing View PostIf anyone is interested, it took 4 $.25 and 1 $.01 to statically balance the horizontal stab.
In terms of servo loads, mass balancing matters next to nothing.Freewing A-10 turbine conversion: http://fb.me/FreewingA10TurbineConversion
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I didn’t realize you had flown the model, and or slow flight’d it yet!Originally posted by janmb View Post
I would have to disagree with that. Trying to fly a nose heavy model slowly is some of the more awkward and hazardous thing you can do - normally.
Obviously have no experience with this particular model yet, but if comparing to the SU-35, it will act pretty damn nasty of forced to high alpha with a poor cg.
To look at it from a different angle: Wait with very slow flight/high alpha until you have worked your way into a proper CG.
Comment
-
I did on my Freewing F-15. It just made me feel better. My 2 cents on the Mig problem ,they way Motion is handleing this is just another reason why I will continue to support them with my cash.Originally posted by Elbee View PostJust my $00.02, has anyone considered actually static balancing the elevators LE/TE using the pivot point as center. Thinking about doing that on my F-18. Just seemed logical what with a full flying elevator of considerable size. Best, LB
Well Done.
Mike
\"When Inverted Down Is Up And Up Is Expensive\"
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I suggest you try to actually read the post you are responding to next time.Originally posted by JLambCWU View Post
I didn’t realize you had flown the model, and or slow flight’d it yet!
As I clearly state, I comment based on general knowledge and engineering skills, not experience on this particular model.
No model responds well to being forced into high alpha against its will - and it doesn't take experience to know this also being the case with the mig.
If you encounter a red hot oven - of a make and model you have never seen before - do you have to put it to the test in order to know you will get burnt if placing your hand on it?
Freewing A-10 turbine conversion: http://fb.me/FreewingA10TurbineConversion
- Likes 2
Comment
-
It is perfectly possible to analyze basic problems based on skills and relevant experience from similar models without requiring hands on experience on a particular model. The mig answers to the same rules of physics as any other aircraft does. And likewise, it is perfectly possible to have hands on experience without necessarily learning a lot from it ;)Originally posted by Pogo View PostKnowing everything precludes the need for actual experience, lol
Freewing A-10 turbine conversion: http://fb.me/FreewingA10TurbineConversion
- Likes 2
Comment
-
JM, Thank you. I understand the flutter dampening. Mass-balancing then is not as important; is that because the weight of the elevators is negligible compared to the forces being applied? I am not a model aircraft aerodynamicist, only an inquisitive amatuer. Best, LBOriginally posted by janmb View PostWell, balancing in terms of mass is just not very important at all - it does help mitigate the onset of flutter at high speeds, but even for that, tight linkages and tight servos (no free play) is far, far more important. In terms of servo loads, mass balancing matters next to nothing.I solemnly swear to "over-celebrate" the smallest of victories.~Lucky B*st*rd~
I don't do this because it is easy; I do this because I thought it would be easy.~LB~
AMA#116446
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Spot on.Originally posted by Elbee View PostMass-balancing then is not as important; is that because the weight of the elevators is negligible compared to the forces being applied?
It certainly doesn't hurt, but it doesn't solve the servo load issues we've seen on the model this far either.
Freewing A-10 turbine conversion: http://fb.me/FreewingA10TurbineConversion
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I’ll play your game, ensuring surfaces are going to correct way is far , far more important than tight linkages and tight servos.Originally posted by janmb View Post
Well, balancing in terms of mass is just not very important at all - it does help mitigate the onset of flutter at high speeds, but even for that, tight linkages and tight servos (no free play) is far, far more important.
In terms of servo loads, mass balancing matters next to nothing.
We can do this all day, bottom line, balancing the stabs does help.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
LC,Originally posted by Lcacing View PostI’ll play your game, ensuring surfaces are going the correct way is far, far more important
Acknowledged and Agreed. Thanks, I needed that. Best, LB
I solemnly swear to "over-celebrate" the smallest of victories.~Lucky B*st*rd~
I don't do this because it is easy; I do this because I thought it would be easy.~LB~
AMA#116446
Comment








Comment