Originally posted by HaroldAnderson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Freewing JAS 39 Gripen 80mm EDF Jet
Collapse
X
-
it took me a couple hard landings to realize I need really fly the Gripen onto the runway. It doesn’t float in like the MiGOriginally posted by radfordc View PostFlying the Gripen and the Mig 29 back to back is quite a contrast. The Mig is like a big stately sedan and the Gripen akin to a Ferrari.
Comment
-
I'm relatively new canards and mixing. Getting ready for a maiden tomorrow and as I play with the gyros trying to stabilize the canards as well as elevons, the canards like to deflect down or up and stay there. Weirdest thing.
I ended up going with a separate gyro on the canards as it's the only way I've found to get stabilization to them.
I'm able to trim the canards with subtrim or offset in the mix itself, but it's a strange phenomena to me why they would deflect differently just changing from direct receiver input to input from the gyro then into the receiever.
Comment
-
Are you changing modes in the gyro? For example, the receiver is feeding conventional ailerons and elevators, and the gyro is interpreting them into elevons.Originally posted by Mizer67 View PostI'm able to trim the canards with subtrim or offset in the mix itself, but it's a strange phenomena to me why they would deflect differently just changing from direct receiver input to input from the gyro then into the receiever.
Comment
-
That's really weird. As you can see in that video I posted up, using a single gyro RX, it all works. No mixing involved. Not that it matters but your view of the signal path is backwards. The signal goes from the RX to the gyro, then out to the servos in the case where you have separate units. In either case, the TX must be set to "normal wing/tail". It's the gyro that gets set to "elevon" or "delta".Originally posted by Mizer67 View PostI'm relatively new canards and mixing. Getting ready for a maiden tomorrow and as I play with the gyros trying to stabilize the canards as well as elevons, the canards like to deflect down or up and stay there. Weirdest thing.
I ended up going with a separate gyro on the canards as it's the only way I've found to get stabilization to them.
I'm able to trim the canards with subtrim or offset in the mix itself, but it's a strange phenomena to me why they would deflect differently just changing from direct receiver input to input from the gyro then into the receiever.
Comment
-
I have mine printed and it really looks nice. The material removed was 15 grams and the heavy nozzle was 62 grams. Now I just need to figure out how much lead to add and glue it on.Originally posted by kallend View Post
Finally got around to maidening mine. Flew very nicely with 133mm CG. 5000mAh HRB pack with my "heavy nozzle" worked out well.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Yes, I have the gyros set on delta/elevon, both for the elevons and the canards.Originally posted by xviper View PostThat's really weird. As you can see in that video I posted up, using a single gyro RX, it all works. No mixing involved. Not that it matters but your view of the signal path is backwards. The signal goes from the RX to the gyro, then out to the servos in the case where you have separate units. In either case, the TX must be set to "normal wing/tail". It's the gyro that gets set to "elevon" or "delta".
The radio is on "normal".
Still get weird stuff going on, but now that I've got it working, I'm just going to roll with it. All the directions of the stabilization is correct. All of the control surfaces working correctly. I just have to trim out with sub trim strange canard at-rest positions.
Comment
-
What kind of gyro? If possible, use the rotary knob for master gain and start with very low gain. Or at least have the ability to turn both OFF at will.Originally posted by Mizer67 View Post
Yes, I have the gyros set on delta/elevon, both for the elevons and the canards.
The radio is on "normal".
Still get weird stuff going on, but now that I've got it working, I'm just going to roll with it. All the directions of the stabilization is correct. All of the control surfaces working correctly. I just have to trim out with sub trim strange canard at-rest positions.
Comment
-
I got my Gripen but its not getting unboxed till Christmas (don't ask) anyway plenty of time to produce a "heavy nozzle" but I know nothing about #D printing and don't have access to a printer. So if I copy the file on thingverse to a USB stick could I take it somewhere to be printed? Or can someone suggest the best and least expensive way to have one made? Thanks
Comment
-
1. Because that's how the real plane does it.Originally posted by Husafreak View PostUnrelated topic so... If anyone can compare this jet with full function (roll and pitch) canards versus pitch only that would be interesting. I was planning to do full function but there are a few folks here that did pitch only. I wondered why limit them?
2. The canards are close to the centerline so any rolling moment they can produce is small compared with the elevons for the same amount of drag produced.
3. The downwash from the canards will cause an opposite rolling moment on the wing, again reducing their effectiveness for roll input.
4. Asymmetric wake shedding will mess with airflow over the main wing. One of the reasons for having canards in the first place is flow control.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Aura 8 setup
FYI I posted this over in groups
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...postcount=1276
You will also find the config file.
The canards act in pitch only and are stabilized along with the Elevons and nose gear steering.
Config file:
Comment
-
If the elevons are set to max throw the plane rolls so fast that I can't keep up! I don't see how making it roll faster by use of the canards is a good thing....but that's just me. I reduced the elevon throws to 75% and it still does a full roll in half a second. Different horses for different courses.Originally posted by Husafreak View PostUnrelated topic so... If anyone can compare this jet with full function (roll and pitch) canards versus pitch only that would be interesting. I was planning to do full function but there are a few folks here that did pitch only. I wondered why limit them?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Check with the members in your club. Surely someone there local has a 3D printer. The guys that fly FPV or quads are very likely to be able to 3D print for you. It isn't a small print job though. It took my printer 13.5 hours but it is an awesome option. Fit and finish is great! I'm hoping I can reuse it with the VT option, when available. Thanks again Kallend.Originally posted by Husafreak View PostI got my Gripen but its not getting unboxed till Christmas (don't ask) anyway plenty of time to produce a "heavy nozzle" but I know nothing about #D printing and don't have access to a printer. So if I copy the file on thingverse to a USB stick could I take it somewhere to be printed? Or can someone suggest the best and least expensive way to have one made? Thanks
My Kallend Heavy Nozzle ended up at 104 grams. Nozzle with 42 grams of lead shot added to balance my RT 5800s 35C (771 grams) at 10-15 MM behind factory CG. The plane also has an afterburner installed which helps a little.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Haha. I must be too used to the roll rate on the mirage cause with my control throw maxed out on the elevons, im still not feeling like the gripen is spinning that fast. Im not complaining though. I think its a nice balanced plan. Although, i would much rather have the gripen over the mirage if i had to choose. The gripen is just so much smoother than the mirage. I never felt like i was chasing after the plane like the mirage. Like it feels more locked in and not as "loose" as the mirage. High alpha was amazing and landing with about third throttle and pitching up was so stinkin predictable and smooth. Im flying at stock cg though. I was thinking of swapping my aluminum shroud edf from my avanti to get that back end a little heavier. Also, remove magnets and aluminum bits from the front nose.
The mirage deffinetly has it beat in balistic speed and power to weight ratio, but i feel like i can do everything else just as good or even better than the mirage.
Comment
-
Having them handle roll and pitch, I noticed some yaw when trying to do a axial roll. I was able to use some differential to get better axial roll, but decided to go pitch only and not have to program any differential. Having it only in pitch also helped with the roll stability in high alphas and landing. The small adjustments to aileron in these situations seemed to make the nose drop and the plane to roll a little making it feel "loose." Other than that, i cant say it made a big enough positive difference for me to have it on roll and pitch. The rudder though. Wow! it has alot of authority in rolling the plane. Want to add a mix to tame it down a little.Originally posted by Husafreak View PostUnrelated topic so... If anyone can compare this jet with full function (roll and pitch) canards versus pitch only that would be interesting.
Comment









Comment