The end is Hubert Hargetts motor is more power dense and 3% more efficient which lead to 1.2 to 2xs the throughput power.
The end is and idiot! who fudges a plot but forgets to track the operational temperature for the validity of pulling the load he pushed in it to arrive at the results he wanted.
Does any hobbyist believe this engine can survive 1827 degrees F.
OOPS!
has the epithet of nasty thread you created years ago changed how motor and drives work or the fact that im more efficient than you and know a sinus from a BLDC waveform.
You wrote all that about me and i still have all the winding contracts and success anyway. If a person was that intelligent they would also know that it woulld not matter the calculator they used because the better recoreded constants follow each motor in the calculators. If Ralph wanted to fuge his number he could come up with better results the same way and still be higher that you. No one will gain efficiecy just based on the cal they used. So that in itself is an absolutely ignorant ideaa.
but the plot is bs anyway. the magnets failed 800C ago.
I aslo dont know what you think happens with an already better motor in the same gearbox...
It was a nice dream nearly 2000 degrees F anyway
what a total moron the aluminum and copper would melt at the suggested operational temperatures in the plot . Certainly thats valid clown!!!
The end is and idiot! who fudges a plot but forgets to track the operational temperature for the validity of pulling the load he pushed in it to arrive at the results he wanted.
Does any hobbyist believe this engine can survive 1827 degrees F.
OOPS!
has the epithet of nasty thread you created years ago changed how motor and drives work or the fact that im more efficient than you and know a sinus from a BLDC waveform.
You wrote all that about me and i still have all the winding contracts and success anyway. If a person was that intelligent they would also know that it woulld not matter the calculator they used because the better recoreded constants follow each motor in the calculators. If Ralph wanted to fuge his number he could come up with better results the same way and still be higher that you. No one will gain efficiecy just based on the cal they used. So that in itself is an absolutely ignorant ideaa.
but the plot is bs anyway. the magnets failed 800C ago.
I aslo dont know what you think happens with an already better motor in the same gearbox...
It was a nice dream nearly 2000 degrees F anyway
what a total moron the aluminum and copper would melt at the suggested operational temperatures in the plot . Certainly thats valid clown!!!










Comment