Official Freewing B-2 Spirit Bomber 86" Twin 70mm EDF Jet

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osuzoo08
    Member
    • Apr 2022
    • 2
    • Send PM

    #541
    Originally posted by Radar-Guy
    I didn't like the fiddling with rulers while setting up the control surfaces, so two gauges were created and printed. +/- 25mm for the rudders, 8mm Up trim for the inboard control surfaces measured at wing bottom. In case someone is interested in the STL files, I'll put them on cults3d. Just let me know.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2022-04-14 123205.jpg
Views:	1605
Size:	80.7 KB
ID:	342949Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5245.JPG
Views:	1628
Size:	35.0 KB
ID:	342948Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5247.JPG
Views:	1587
Size:	32.0 KB
ID:	342950
    I would love if you posted those

    Comment

    • xviper
      Hobby Squawk Regular

      • Jan 2014
      • 8761
      • Calgary, Canada
      • Send PM

      #542
      Originally posted by ridgerunner
      A picture tells a thousand words... (e.g. this one from the manual of the very similar HobbyEagle A3S3 Gyro is very clear)

      Click image for larger version

Name:	GyroWiringDiagram.gif
Views:	806
Size:	75.9 KB
ID:	342967
      I thought about that diagram myself but there's one potential anomaly ..................................... Notice how the gain (G) pin on the gyro is fed by the black (dark) wire of the 3 wire lead? Then it goes (single wire) to the "master gain" port at the RX. (The HE and E-52 gyro uses a 3-wire lead than ends in 3 separate single wires with their own plugs. A private individual would use a standard 3-wire to 3-wire female/female extension.) Those who have "polarity" on the brain will then plug that end with the single black wire to "ground", in which case, it WON'T work. That black lead must go to the "signal" pin on the RX port. Plus, on the B-2, if a person used a 3-wire lead, it may be necessary to either pull out the other two ends in the plug or clip the other two wires to prevent any signal interference because the RX will send power through the middle wire and the remaining wire is grounded.

      Comment

      • kallend
        -----

        • Nov 2016
        • 1870
        • Send PM

        #543
        Originally posted by xviper
        I thought about that diagram myself but there's one potential anomaly ..................................... Notice how the gain (G) pin on the gyro is fed by the black (dark) wire of the 3 wire lead? Then it goes (single wire) to the "master gain" port at the RX. (The HE and E-52 gyro uses a 3-wire lead than ends in 3 separate single wires with their own plugs. A private individual would use a standard 3-wire to 3-wire female/female extension.) .
        I'm a "private individual" and I had no problem connecting it up correctly, based on the diagram.

        Comment

        • Hugh Wiedman
          Demolition Pilot

          • Jan 2018
          • 2693
          • Miami
          • Send PM

          #544
          Originally posted by Radar-Guy

          I used a well maintained battery, IR values in the 4,x range.
          For some reason, those IR values seem high to me. I assume you're talking about individual cell IR's in mohms, no? As some of you know, I've been way too deep in testing different batteries for the last few years and using the Progressive IR meter, I've gotten the following results on various 6S batteries:
          SMC 8100: 1.8-1.6, SMC 6200: 1.37-1.14, SMC 5300: 1.61-1.42, HRB 6000: 1.97-1.79, Roaring Top 6250: 3.21-2.96, Admiral 6000: Pro 3.27-2.96 Admiral 5000: 4.01-3.64.

          As far as power draws, your numbers look OK, but I've found that the difference between an Admiral 5000 at the high end of the IR curve and say the SMC 5300 results in at least 8-10 Ah more and about about 250-300 Watts more. Out of curiosity, what pack are you using?
          Hugh "Wildman" Wiedman
          Hangar: EDF's: Mig 29 TV "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, SU-27 90mm 8S:F22 Red Lion/EuroFighterBronzeTiger/F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet/F16/F4 Jolly Rodgers & Blue Angel, 80&90 TV Avanti, Viper, Stinger 90. Props: 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, B-24, 1700 P-51, 60" Beast & P2 Bipe, Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 62" Extra 300, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, 62" Edge

          Comment

          • kallend
            -----

            • Nov 2016
            • 1870
            • Send PM

            #545
            Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman

            For some reason, those IR values seem high to me. I assume you're talking about individual cell IR's in mohms, no? As some of you know, I've been way too deep in testing different batteries for the last few years and using the Progressive IR meter, I've gotten the following results on various 6S batteries:
            SMC 8100: 1.8-1.6, SMC 6200: 1.37-1.14, SMC 5300: 1.61-1.42, HRB 6000: 1.97-1.79, Roaring Top 6250: 3.21-2.96, Admiral 6000: Pro 3.27-2.96 Admiral 5000: 4.01-3.64.

            As far as power draws, your numbers look OK, but I've found that the difference between an Admiral 5000 at the high end of the IR curve and say the SMC 5300 results in at least 8-10 Ah more and about about 250-300 Watts more. Out of curiosity, what pack are you using?
            Also worth bearing in mind is that a 10 degree C (18F) temperature drop can lead to a doubling of IR values. Cold packs don't perform well.

            Comment

            • Hugh Wiedman
              Demolition Pilot

              • Jan 2018
              • 2693
              • Miami
              • Send PM

              #546
              Originally posted by Radar-Guy

              Onboard telemetry (real time display on TX) showed peak value of slightly above 100 A.The Amp draw stabilised at around 90 A, no unusual sag of Voltage. That‘s close to 500W
              On second thought, that doesn't seem right, or it's very low. Watts=Amps X Volts. So 2,520 Watts (that's both fans together, not each fan) = 100 Amps X 25.2 Volts (a single 6S Cell). 2,520 watts for 2 70mm fans is anemic. The 70mm FMS Fans I put in an SU-30 draw (together) 150.9 Ah and 3,750 watts using an SMC 6200. Using and Admiral or other battery more like 135 Ah and 3400 watts. At 90Ah, you're down to 2250 watts (for both fans together). I have rubber bands that work better!
              Hugh "Wildman" Wiedman
              Hangar: EDF's: Mig 29 TV "Cobra", A-10 Arctic, SU-27 90mm 8S:F22 Red Lion/EuroFighterBronzeTiger/F18 Canadian & Tiger Meet/F16/F4 Jolly Rodgers & Blue Angel, 80&90 TV Avanti, Viper, Stinger 90. Props: 1600 Corsair & Spitfire, B-24, 1700 P-51, 60" Beast & P2 Bipe, Extreme Flight-FW-190 Red Tulip, Slick 60, 62" Extra 300, 62" MXS Heavy Metal, 62" Edge

              Comment

              • xviper
                Hobby Squawk Regular

                • Jan 2014
                • 8761
                • Calgary, Canada
                • Send PM

                #547
                Originally posted by kallend

                I'm a "private individual" and I had no problem connecting it up correctly, based on the diagram.
                I supposed I should have used a different term, perhaps "average" or "inexperienced in gyro set up". We've already seen this on RC Guppy where a couple of people have hooked up the master gain and it didn't work and they spoke of "standard polarity".




                The next thing coming down the pike is the use of the HE programmer on this E-52. Several have indicated that it did not work, however, one person made it work by unplugging the power and plugging the battery back in again. Now I'm beginning to wonder if updating the HE programmer would make it work every time. It would seem that the HE programmer needs an update to work well with the new A3S4.

                Comment

                • kallend
                  -----

                  • Nov 2016
                  • 1870
                  • Send PM

                  #548
                  Originally posted by xviper
                  I supposed I should have used a different term, perhaps "average" or "inexperienced in gyro set up". We've already seen this on RC Guppy where a couple of people have hooked up the master gain and it didn't work and they spoke of "standard polarity".




                  The next thing coming down the pike is the use of the HE programmer on this E-52. Several have indicated that it did not work, however, one person made it work by unplugging the power and plugging the battery back in again. Now I'm beginning to wonder if updating the HE programmer would make it work every time. It would seem that the HE programmer needs an update to work well with the new A3S4.
                  You only need to change one bit in a device ID to make them incompatible. So even if functionally equivalent the E52 may have been deliberately made incompatible. I don't know anything about the effect of power cycling.

                  For first flights I would not recommend messing with the gyro anyway.

                  Comment

                  • Radar-Guy
                    AirBorn Jetworkx

                    • Apr 2016
                    • 364
                    • Send PM

                    #549
                    Thanks guys! The IR values were measured with a Junsi 4010 charger and my Lipos with such or lower value are powering my planes just fine. The outside temperature was considered as well, we had 20 deg C.
                    About the voltage: Who is using onboard telemetry or logging? You will NEVER get 4,2 V/cell under "standard EDF loads". It also of not much value to marvel at peak power, which was available for a few seconds. Have a look at performance charts published by serious EDF manufacturers like Wemotec or Ejets/Jetfan, where "stabilised" voltages during their testing was around 3,7V/cell. This is also the reason for the fantastic thrust values for fans from China. Power a fan unit with a steady 25,2V power supply and WOW!!!

                    I didn't fit a logger yesterday, just a real-time module. I will add one next time. Here is an example of a logged flight. Single FMS 70mm EDF, 6s, 3060-1900 kV, RT Lipo.
                    Red graph shows current, blue one Voltage

                    @ Hugh: Since you were involved in battery testing, could you show me one of your in-flight recordings? I'd love to replace my rubber bands!

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Log Example 6s.jpg Views:	0 Size:	123.9 KB ID:	342978

                    Comment

                    • xviper
                      Hobby Squawk Regular

                      • Jan 2014
                      • 8761
                      • Calgary, Canada
                      • Send PM

                      #550
                      Originally posted by kallend

                      You only need to change one bit in a device ID to make them incompatible. So even if functionally equivalent the E52 may have been deliberately made incompatible. I don't know anything about the effect of power cycling.

                      For first flights I would not recommend messing with the gyro anyway.
                      That is true and indisputable.
                      See my post #574 for updated and corrected information.
                      I agree that the first flights should be with gyro as is, however, doesn't hurt to hook up the master gain and leave it at 100% to allow the set gains to do their thing. At least that way, if oscillation occurs, it can be reduced or turned off. I see no sense in increasing travel on the rotary to above 100% until the set gains can be altered.

                      Comment

                      • Radar-Guy
                        AirBorn Jetworkx

                        • Apr 2016
                        • 364
                        • Send PM

                        #551
                        Originally posted by osuzoo08

                        I would love if you posted those
                        Files are available here:
                        https://cults3d.com/de/modell-3d/ver...ce-setup-tools

                        Note: the rudder setup tool is currently symmetrical in regard to up/down deflection. 22,5 mm per direction. During my setup, the "closed' position - the "TE" of both rudder surfaces - was 2-3 mm below the wing tip's TE. I've corrected this by adjusting both rudder surfaces by equal amounts to get both TEs level.

                        Comment

                        • Radar-Guy
                          AirBorn Jetworkx

                          • Apr 2016
                          • 364
                          • Send PM

                          #552
                          Single wheel main gear conversion finished, the nose gear wheels were also exchanged (50mm). Reverting to stock main struts can be done in less than 10 minutes, no foam had to be cut at this point. Positive AoA is retained.

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5266.JPG Views:	0 Size:	186.4 KB ID:	342991

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5267.JPG Views:	0 Size:	221.4 KB ID:	342992

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	2D8350C1-96C0-496D-A328-F4D5FACA3467.JPG Views:	0 Size:	113.5 KB ID:	342994

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2022-04-14 185045.jpg Views:	0 Size:	19.5 KB ID:	342993


                          Comment

                          • crxmanpat
                            Certified Foam Abuser

                            • Oct 2014
                            • 2464
                            • Crawfordville, FL
                            • Send PM

                            #553
                            "Spirit of the Weeds"

                            Pat

                            Comment

                            • jasmith41
                              EDF-obsessed
                              • Sep 2021
                              • 316
                              • AZ and NE Ohio
                              • Send PM

                              #554
                              Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman

                              Yah, I think this one is a complete disaster and would be more than happy to relieve you of it for say a 50% discount, which is obviously well more than it is worth. Seriously, you haven't even unboxed it and you're listening to a few crazies instead of the designers and those that have been flying it for over a year and are raving about it? Finish it out, set it up as the those real experts tell you to and just have a blast with it and stop whining!
                              🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😎 "and stop whining..."

                              Save the whining for the maiden if you don't set it up right...

                              Comment

                              • jasmith41
                                EDF-obsessed
                                • Sep 2021
                                • 316
                                • AZ and NE Ohio
                                • Send PM

                                #555
                                I swear to God, if you guys keep posting all this sh*t about how great that plane is, I'll f*ck up again and go buy one without prior approval from the war department (wife)...😂😂😂

                                Just keep it up...

                                Comment

                                • jasmith41
                                  EDF-obsessed
                                  • Sep 2021
                                  • 316
                                  • AZ and NE Ohio
                                  • Send PM

                                  #556
                                  Originally posted by xviper
                                  I thought about that diagram myself but there's one potential anomaly ..................................... Notice how the gain (G) pin on the gyro is fed by the black (dark) wire of the 3 wire lead? Then it goes (single wire) to the "master gain" port at the RX. (The HE and E-52 gyro uses a 3-wire lead than ends in 3 separate single wires with their own plugs. A private individual would use a standard 3-wire to 3-wire female/female extension.) Those who have "polarity" on the brain will then plug that end with the single black wire to "ground", in which case, it WON'T work. That black lead must go to the "signal" pin on the RX port. Plus, on the B-2, if a person used a 3-wire lead, it may be necessary to either pull out the other two ends in the plug or clip the other two wires to prevent any signal interference because the RX will send power through the middle wire and the remaining wire is grounded.
                                  They said there'd be no math...

                                  Comment

                                  • jasmith41
                                    EDF-obsessed
                                    • Sep 2021
                                    • 316
                                    • AZ and NE Ohio
                                    • Send PM

                                    #557
                                    Originally posted by Hugh Wiedman

                                    On second thought, that doesn't seem right, or it's very low. Watts=Amps X Volts. So 2,520 Watts (that's both fans together, not each fan) = 100 Amps X 25.2 Volts (a single 6S Cell). 2,520 watts for 2 70mm fans is anemic. The 70mm FMS Fans I put in an SU-30 draw (together) 150.9 Ah and 3,750 watts using an SMC 6200. Using and Admiral or other battery more like 135 Ah and 3400 watts. At 90Ah, you're down to 2250 watts (for both fans together). I have rubber bands that work better!
                                    Too much math...😆😎

                                    Comment

                                    • MeyerVW
                                      crash test pilot

                                      • May 2020
                                      • 288
                                      • Dude who likes flying.
                                      • Send PM

                                      #558
                                      Ready to fly. I think the only thing that could have been done or upgraded is the rudder rods. I had some issues and it took me a a while to set it up correctly. To solve this I would replace the rods with tie rod style rods and end. Just one end has to be reverse threaded and one end is reverse thread. Simply twist and off you go. The factory way is not bad but it gave of us some problems. Tested it on the road and it goes nice and straight during testing. Fast and slow. Looks like Sunday will be my day to test it.

                                      Comment

                                      • xviper
                                        Hobby Squawk Regular

                                        • Jan 2014
                                        • 8761
                                        • Calgary, Canada
                                        • Send PM

                                        #559
                                        Originally posted by MeyerVW
                                        Ready to fly. I think the only thing that could have been done or upgraded is the rudder rods. I had some issues and it took me a a while to set it up correctly. To solve this I would replace the rods with tie rod style rods and end. Just one end has to be reverse threaded and one end is reverse thread. Simply twist and off you go. The factory way is not bad but it gave of us some problems. Tested it on the road and it goes nice and straight during testing. Fast and slow. Looks like Sunday will be my day to test it.
                                        I see what you're getting at ........................... "Turnbuckle" style. Good idea.

                                        Comment

                                        • Gilatrout
                                          RC Pilot Addict

                                          • Dec 2016
                                          • 806
                                          • Albuquerque NM
                                          • Send PM

                                          #560
                                          Photo op at the field today. Click image for larger version

Name:	PXL_20220414_180456019.jpg
Views:	779
Size:	215.0 KB
ID:	343030
                                          Attached Files

                                          Comment

                                          Working...